System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 8.5s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (+ 1.0 (- (log z) z)) y (* x 0.5)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((1.0 + (log(z) - z)), y, (x * 0.5));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(1.0 + Float64(log(z) - z)), y, Float64(x * 0.5))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 + N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * y + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \cdot y} + x \cdot 0.5 \]

   3. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   4. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   5. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   7. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

Alternative 2: 75.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ t_1 := x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-198}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-146}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-123}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-70}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (+ 1.0 (log z)))) (t_1 (- (* x 0.5) (* z y))))
   (if (<= z 2.9e-198)
     t_1
     (if (<= z 3.8e-146)
       t_0
       (if (<= z 3.4e-123)
         t_1
         (if (<= z 5e-70) t_0 (fma (- z) y (* x 0.5))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	double t_1 = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.9e-198) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 3.8e-146) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 3.4e-123) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 5e-70) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(-z, y, (x * 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + log(z)))
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(z * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 2.9e-198)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 3.8e-146)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 3.4e-123)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 5e-70)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(-z), y, Float64(x * 0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, 2.9e-198], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 3.8e-146], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 3.4e-123], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 5e-70], t$95$0, N[((-z) * y + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < 2.90000000000000001e-198 or 3.79999999999999994e-146 < z < 3.4000000000000001e-123

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 65.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 65.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 65.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 65.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   if 2.90000000000000001e-198 < z < 3.79999999999999994e-146 or 3.4000000000000001e-123 < z < 4.9999999999999998e-70

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 75.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]

      3. sub-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. mul-1-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\log z - z\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      7. distribute-neg-in 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) + \left(-\log z\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. remove-double-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(\color{blue}{z} + \left(-\log z\right)\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      9. sub-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(z - \log z\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 75.1%

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(z - \log z\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \]

      11. +-commutative 75.1%

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 + \left(z - \log z\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + \left(z - \log z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \log z\right) \cdot y} \]

   if 4.9999999999999998e-70 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \cdot y} + x \cdot 0.5 \]

      3. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-z}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   6. Simplified 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-z}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-198}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-146}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-123}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-70}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 75.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{-198} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.4 \cdot 10^{-147} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-124}\right) \land z \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z 2.95e-198)
         (not
          (or (<= z 9.4e-147) (and (not (<= z 3.3e-124)) (<= z 1.95e-66)))))
   (- (* x 0.5) (* z y))
   (* y (+ 1.0 (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= 2.95e-198) || !((z <= 9.4e-147) || (!(z <= 3.3e-124) && (z <= 1.95e-66)))) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= 2.95d-198) .or. (.not. (z <= 9.4d-147) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.3d-124)) .and. (z <= 1.95d-66))) then
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (z * y)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 + log(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= 2.95e-198) || !((z <= 9.4e-147) || (!(z <= 3.3e-124) && (z <= 1.95e-66)))) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + Math.log(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= 2.95e-198) or not ((z <= 9.4e-147) or (not (z <= 3.3e-124) and (z <= 1.95e-66))):
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 + math.log(z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= 2.95e-198) || !((z <= 9.4e-147) || (!(z <= 3.3e-124) && (z <= 1.95e-66))))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(z * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + log(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= 2.95e-198) || ~(((z <= 9.4e-147) || (~((z <= 3.3e-124)) && (z <= 1.95e-66)))))
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, 2.95e-198], N[Not[Or[LessEqual[z, 9.4e-147], And[N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.3e-124]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[z, 1.95e-66]]]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 2.94999999999999987e-198 or 9.39999999999999978e-147 < z < 3.29999999999999984e-124 or 1.94999999999999991e-66 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 84.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 84.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 84.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 84.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   if 2.94999999999999987e-198 < z < 9.39999999999999978e-147 or 3.29999999999999984e-124 < z < 1.94999999999999991e-66

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 75.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]

      3. sub-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. mul-1-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\log z - z\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      7. distribute-neg-in 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) + \left(-\log z\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. remove-double-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(\color{blue}{z} + \left(-\log z\right)\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      9. sub-neg 75.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(z - \log z\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 75.1%

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(z - \log z\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \]

      11. +-commutative 75.1%

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 + \left(z - \log z\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + \left(z - \log z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \log z\right) \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{-198} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.4 \cdot 10^{-147} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-124}\right) \land z \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 85.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+16} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.28 \cdot 10^{+63}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\left(1 + \log z\right) - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -3.3e+16) (not (<= y 1.28e+63)))
   (* y (- (+ 1.0 (log z)) z))
   (fma (- z) y (* x 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.3e+16) || !(y <= 1.28e+63)) {
		tmp = y * ((1.0 + log(z)) - z);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(-z, y, (x * 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -3.3e+16) || !(y <= 1.28e+63))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 + log(z)) - z));
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(-z), y, Float64(x * 0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3.3e+16], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.28e+63]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[((-z) * y + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.3e16 or 1.27999999999999994e63 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \cdot y} + x \cdot 0.5 \]

      3. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 + \log z\right) - z\right)} \]

   if -3.3e16 < y < 1.27999999999999994e63

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \cdot y} + x \cdot 0.5 \]

      3. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-z}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   6. Simplified 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-z}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+16} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.28 \cdot 10^{+63}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\left(1 + \log z\right) - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 98.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.28:\\ \;\;\;\;\log z \cdot y + \left(y + x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 0.28) (+ (* (log z) y) (+ y (* x 0.5))) (fma (- z) y (* x 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.28) {
		tmp = (log(z) * y) + (y + (x * 0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(-z, y, (x * 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 0.28)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(log(z) * y) + Float64(y + Float64(x * 0.5)));
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(-z), y, Float64(x * 0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 0.28], N[(N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[((-z) * y + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 0.28000000000000003

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \log z + \left(0.5 \cdot x + y\right)} \]

   if 0.28000000000000003 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \cdot y} + x \cdot 0.5 \]

      3. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-z}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   6. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-z}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.28:\\ \;\;\;\;\log z \cdot y + \left(y + x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\log z + \left(1 - z\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (log z) (- 1.0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * (log(z) + (1.0 - z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * (log(z) + (1.0d0 - z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * (Math.log(z) + (1.0 - z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * (math.log(z) + (1.0 - z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(log(z) + Float64(1.0 - z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * (log(z) + (1.0 - z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\log z + \left(1 - z\right)\right) \]

Alternative 7: 74.9% accurate, 15.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x 0.5) (* z y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) - (z * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) - (z * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(z * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 73.4%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 73.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 73.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

4. Simplified 73.4%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 73.4%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y \]

Alternative 8: 59.3% accurate, 18.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+45}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 3.5e+45) (* x 0.5) (* z (- y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 3.5e+45) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 3.5d+45) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = z * -y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 3.5e+45) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 3.5e+45:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = z * -y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 3.5e+45)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 3.5e+45)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = z * -y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 3.5e+45], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 3.50000000000000023e45

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

   if 3.50000000000000023e45 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \cdot y} + x \cdot 0.5 \]

      3. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 77.1%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+45}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 40.1% accurate, 37.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x 0.5))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * 0.5

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * 0.5)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 39.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

3. Final simplification 39.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 \]

Alternative 10: 1.8% accurate, 111.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 y)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return y
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := y

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-lft-in 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

   4. *-rgt-identity 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

   5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

   6. fma-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

   8. unsub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 61.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 61.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 61.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]

   3. sub-neg 61.4%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]

   4. mul-1-neg 61.4%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\log z - z\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. sub-neg 61.4%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 61.4%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

   7. distribute-neg-in 61.4%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) + \left(-\log z\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

   8. remove-double-neg 61.4%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(\color{blue}{z} + \left(-\log z\right)\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

   9. sub-neg 61.4%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(z - \log z\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

   10. metadata-eval 61.4%

       \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(z - \log z\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \]

   11. +-commutative 61.4%

       \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 + \left(z - \log z\right)\right)}\right) \]

6. Simplified 61.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + \left(z - \log z\right)\right)\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-exp-log 58.9%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(z - \log z\right)}}\right)\right) \]

8. Applied egg-rr 58.9%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(z - \log z\right)}}\right)\right) \]

9. Taylor expanded in z around inf 35.2%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + \color{blue}{z}\right)\right) \]

10. Taylor expanded in z around 0 1.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]

11. Final simplification 1.8%

    \[\leadsto y \]

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(y + 0.5 \cdot x\right) - y \cdot \left(z - \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (y + (0.5d0 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * x)) - Float64(y * Float64(z - log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y + N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(z - N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023207 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z))))

  (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))