math.sqrt on complex, imaginary part, im greater than 0 branch

Percentage Accurate: 41.3% → 90.0%

Time: 5.0s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 2.0×

Specification

\[im > 0\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) - re))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 41.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) - re))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re)));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 90.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(im \cdot \sqrt{2}\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right) \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re) 0.0)
   (* (* (* im (sqrt 2.0)) (sqrt 0.5)) (* 0.5 (sqrt (/ 1.0 re))))
   (sqrt (* 0.5 (- (hypot re im) re)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = ((im * sqrt(2.0)) * sqrt(0.5)) * (0.5 * sqrt((1.0 / re)));
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt((0.5 * (hypot(re, im) - re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = ((im * Math.sqrt(2.0)) * Math.sqrt(0.5)) * (0.5 * Math.sqrt((1.0 / re)));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sqrt((0.5 * (Math.hypot(re, im) - re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) <= 0.0:
		tmp = ((im * math.sqrt(2.0)) * math.sqrt(0.5)) * (0.5 * math.sqrt((1.0 / re)))
	else:
		tmp = math.sqrt((0.5 * (math.hypot(re, im) - re)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) - re) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(im * sqrt(2.0)) * sqrt(0.5)) * Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(1.0 / re))));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(Float64(0.5 * Float64(hypot(re, im) - re)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) <= 0.0)
		tmp = ((im * sqrt(2.0)) * sqrt(0.5)) * (0.5 * sqrt((1.0 / re)));
	else
		tmp = sqrt((0.5 * (hypot(re, im) - re)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(N[(N[(im * N[Sqrt[2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[0.5], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(1.0 / re), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 * N[(N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 9.5%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in im around 0 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{0.5} \cdot im\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{0.5} \cdot im\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right) \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. associate-*l* 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{0.5} \cdot im\right)\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{re}} \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right)}\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{re}} \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      4. associate-*r* 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot im\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right)} \cdot \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{re}} \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   4. Simplified 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot im\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{re}} \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   if 0.0 < (-.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re)

   1. Initial program 45.2%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right) \cdot 2}} \]

      2. hypot-udef 89.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} - re\right) \cdot 2} \]

      3. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

      4. add-sqr-sqrt 88.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}}} \]

      5. sqrt-unprod 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right) \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right)}} \]

      6. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right)} \]

      7. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot 0.5\right)}} \]

      8. swap-sqr 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right) \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot 0.5\right)}} \]

      9. add-sqr-sqrt 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right)} \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      10. metadata-eval 89.4%

          \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.25}} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right) \cdot 0.25}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{0.25 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right)}} \]

      2. associate-*r* 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

      3. metadata-eval 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(im \cdot \sqrt{2}\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right) \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 90.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{re}} \cdot \left(im \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re) 0.0)
   (* 0.5 (* (sqrt 2.0) (* (sqrt (/ 1.0 re)) (* im (sqrt 0.5)))))
   (sqrt (* 0.5 (- (hypot re im) re)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (sqrt(2.0) * (sqrt((1.0 / re)) * (im * sqrt(0.5))));
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt((0.5 * (hypot(re, im) - re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (Math.sqrt(2.0) * (Math.sqrt((1.0 / re)) * (im * Math.sqrt(0.5))));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sqrt((0.5 * (Math.hypot(re, im) - re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) <= 0.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * (math.sqrt(2.0) * (math.sqrt((1.0 / re)) * (im * math.sqrt(0.5))))
	else:
		tmp = math.sqrt((0.5 * (math.hypot(re, im) - re)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) - re) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(sqrt(2.0) * Float64(sqrt(Float64(1.0 / re)) * Float64(im * sqrt(0.5)))));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(Float64(0.5 * Float64(hypot(re, im) - re)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) <= 0.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * (sqrt(2.0) * (sqrt((1.0 / re)) * (im * sqrt(0.5))));
	else
		tmp = sqrt((0.5 * (hypot(re, im) - re)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(0.5 * N[(N[Sqrt[2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(1.0 / re), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(im * N[Sqrt[0.5], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 * N[(N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 9.5%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in im around 0 91.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{0.5} \cdot im\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 91.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \left(\left(\sqrt{0.5} \cdot im\right) \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 91.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(im \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)\right) \]

   4. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \left(\left(im \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right) \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)\right)} \]

   if 0.0 < (-.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re)

   1. Initial program 45.2%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right) \cdot 2}} \]

      2. hypot-udef 89.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} - re\right) \cdot 2} \]

      3. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

      4. add-sqr-sqrt 88.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}}} \]

      5. sqrt-unprod 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right) \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right)}} \]

      6. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right)} \]

      7. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot 0.5\right)}} \]

      8. swap-sqr 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right) \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot 0.5\right)}} \]

      9. add-sqr-sqrt 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right)} \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      10. metadata-eval 89.4%

          \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.25}} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right) \cdot 0.25}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{0.25 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right)}} \]

      2. associate-*r* 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

      3. metadata-eval 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{re}} \cdot \left(im \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 90.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(im \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re) 0.0)
   (* 0.5 (* (* im (sqrt 0.5)) (* (sqrt 2.0) (sqrt (/ 1.0 re)))))
   (sqrt (* 0.5 (- (hypot re im) re)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((im * sqrt(0.5)) * (sqrt(2.0) * sqrt((1.0 / re))));
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt((0.5 * (hypot(re, im) - re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((im * Math.sqrt(0.5)) * (Math.sqrt(2.0) * Math.sqrt((1.0 / re))));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sqrt((0.5 * (Math.hypot(re, im) - re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) <= 0.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * ((im * math.sqrt(0.5)) * (math.sqrt(2.0) * math.sqrt((1.0 / re))))
	else:
		tmp = math.sqrt((0.5 * (math.hypot(re, im) - re)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) - re) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(Float64(im * sqrt(0.5)) * Float64(sqrt(2.0) * sqrt(Float64(1.0 / re)))));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(Float64(0.5 * Float64(hypot(re, im) - re)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) <= 0.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * ((im * sqrt(0.5)) * (sqrt(2.0) * sqrt((1.0 / re))));
	else
		tmp = sqrt((0.5 * (hypot(re, im) - re)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(0.5 * N[(N[(im * N[Sqrt[0.5], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Sqrt[2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[(1.0 / re), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 * N[(N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 9.5%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in im around 0 91.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt{0.5} \cdot im\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt{0.5} \cdot im\right) \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 91.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt{0.5} \cdot im\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 91.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(im \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right)} \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)\right) \]

   4. Simplified 91.2%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(im \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)\right)} \]

   if 0.0 < (-.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re)

   1. Initial program 45.2%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right) \cdot 2}} \]

      2. hypot-udef 89.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} - re\right) \cdot 2} \]

      3. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

      4. add-sqr-sqrt 88.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}}} \]

      5. sqrt-unprod 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right) \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right)}} \]

      6. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right)} \]

      7. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot 0.5\right)}} \]

      8. swap-sqr 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right) \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot 0.5\right)}} \]

      9. add-sqr-sqrt 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right)} \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      10. metadata-eval 89.4%

          \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.25}} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right) \cdot 0.25}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{0.25 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right)}} \]

      2. associate-*r* 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

      3. metadata-eval 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\left(im \cdot \sqrt{0.5}\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{re}}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 84.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{\left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right) \cdot 2} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{re}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (sqrt (* (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re) 2.0)) 0.0)
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (/ (* im im) re)))
   (sqrt (* 0.5 (- (hypot re im) re)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (sqrt(((sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) * 2.0)) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(((im * im) / re));
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt((0.5 * (hypot(re, im) - re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.sqrt(((Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) * 2.0)) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt(((im * im) / re));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sqrt((0.5 * (Math.hypot(re, im) - re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if math.sqrt(((math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) * 2.0)) <= 0.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt(((im * im) / re))
	else:
		tmp = math.sqrt((0.5 * (math.hypot(re, im) - re)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (sqrt(Float64(Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) - re) * 2.0)) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(im * im) / re)));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(Float64(0.5 * Float64(hypot(re, im) - re)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (sqrt(((sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) - re) * 2.0)) <= 0.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(((im * im) / re));
	else
		tmp = sqrt((0.5 * (hypot(re, im) - re)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision] / re), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 * N[(N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision] - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (sqrt.f64 (*.f64 2 (-.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re))) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 11.4%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 11.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} - re\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around inf 52.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 52.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}} \]

   6. Simplified 52.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{im \cdot im}{re}}} \]

   if 0.0 < (sqrt.f64 (*.f64 2 (-.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re)))

   1. Initial program 44.0%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 44.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right) \cdot 2}} \]

      2. hypot-udef 88.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} - re\right) \cdot 2} \]

      3. *-commutative 88.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

      4. add-sqr-sqrt 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}}} \]

      5. sqrt-unprod 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right) \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right)}} \]

      6. *-commutative 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right)} \]

      7. *-commutative 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot 0.5\right)}} \]

      8. swap-sqr 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\right) \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot 0.5\right)}} \]

      9. add-sqr-sqrt 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right)} \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      10. metadata-eval 88.4%

          \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.25}} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right) \cdot 0.25}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{0.25 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)\right)}} \]

      2. associate-*r* 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

      3. metadata-eval 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{\left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right) \cdot 2} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{re}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 63.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{re \cdot -4}\\ \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+131}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(im - re\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-27}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* re -4.0)))))
   (if (<= re -3e+131)
     t_0
     (if (<= re -2.9e-13)
       (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (- im re))))
       (if (<= re -2.8e-27) t_0 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* im 2.0))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = 0.5 * sqrt((re * -4.0));
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -3e+131) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (re <= -2.9e-13) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (im - re)));
	} else if (re <= -2.8e-27) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((im * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = 0.5d0 * sqrt((re * (-4.0d0)))
    if (re <= (-3d+131)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (re <= (-2.9d-13)) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (im - re)))
    else if (re <= (-2.8d-27)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((im * 2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((re * -4.0));
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -3e+131) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (re <= -2.9e-13) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (im - re)));
	} else if (re <= -2.8e-27) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((im * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	t_0 = 0.5 * math.sqrt((re * -4.0))
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -3e+131:
		tmp = t_0
	elif re <= -2.9e-13:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (im - re)))
	elif re <= -2.8e-27:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((im * 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	t_0 = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(re * -4.0)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -3e+131)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (re <= -2.9e-13)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(im - re))));
	elseif (re <= -2.8e-27)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(im * 2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	t_0 = 0.5 * sqrt((re * -4.0));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -3e+131)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (re <= -2.9e-13)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (im - re)));
	elseif (re <= -2.8e-27)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((im * 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(re * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[re, -3e+131], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[re, -2.9e-13], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(im - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, -2.8e-27], t$95$0, N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(im * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if re < -3.0000000000000001e131 or -2.8999999999999998e-13 < re < -2.8e-27

   1. Initial program 24.2%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} - re\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around -inf 96.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{re \cdot -4}} \]

   6. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{re \cdot -4}} \]

   if -3.0000000000000001e131 < re < -2.8999999999999998e-13

   1. Initial program 64.1%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in re around 0 66.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{im} - re\right)} \]

   if -2.8e-27 < re

   1. Initial program 41.2%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 71.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} - re\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 62.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 62.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]

   6. Simplified 62.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+131}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{re \cdot -4}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(im - re\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-27}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{re \cdot -4}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 68.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{+132}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{re \cdot -4}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+56}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(im - re\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{re}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -1.12e+132)
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (* re -4.0)))
   (if (<= re 1.15e+56)
     (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (- im re))))
     (* 0.5 (sqrt (/ (* im im) re))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -1.12e+132) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((re * -4.0));
	} else if (re <= 1.15e+56) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (im - re)));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(((im * im) / re));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= (-1.12d+132)) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((re * (-4.0d0)))
    else if (re <= 1.15d+56) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (im - re)))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt(((im * im) / re))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -1.12e+132) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((re * -4.0));
	} else if (re <= 1.15e+56) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (im - re)));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt(((im * im) / re));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -1.12e+132:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((re * -4.0))
	elif re <= 1.15e+56:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (im - re)))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt(((im * im) / re))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -1.12e+132)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(re * -4.0)));
	elseif (re <= 1.15e+56)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(im - re))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(im * im) / re)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -1.12e+132)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((re * -4.0));
	elseif (re <= 1.15e+56)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (im - re)));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(((im * im) / re));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -1.12e+132], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(re * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 1.15e+56], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(im - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision] / re), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if re < -1.12e132

   1. Initial program 17.3%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} - re\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around -inf 95.6%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 95.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{re \cdot -4}} \]

   6. Simplified 95.6%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{re \cdot -4}} \]

   if -1.12e132 < re < 1.15000000000000007e56

   1. Initial program 56.2%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in re around 0 74.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{im} - re\right)} \]

   if 1.15000000000000007e56 < re

   1. Initial program 11.1%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 38.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} - re\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 38.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around inf 54.1%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 54.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}} \]

   6. Simplified 54.1%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{im \cdot im}{re}}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{+132}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{re \cdot -4}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+56}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(im - re\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{re}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 64.6% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{re \cdot -4}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -4.5e-28) (* 0.5 (sqrt (* re -4.0))) (* 0.5 (sqrt (* im 2.0)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -4.5e-28) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((re * -4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((im * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= (-4.5d-28)) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((re * (-4.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((im * 2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -4.5e-28) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((re * -4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((im * 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -4.5e-28:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((re * -4.0))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((im * 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -4.5e-28)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(re * -4.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(im * 2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -4.5e-28)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((re * -4.0));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((im * 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -4.5e-28], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(re * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(im * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -4.4999999999999998e-28

   1. Initial program 37.5%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} - re\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around -inf 79.2%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot re}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{re \cdot -4}} \]

   6. Simplified 79.2%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{re \cdot -4}} \]

   if -4.4999999999999998e-28 < re

   1. Initial program 41.2%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 71.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} - re\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 62.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 62.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]

   6. Simplified 62.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{re \cdot -4}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 52.3% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* im 2.0))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((im * 2.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((im * 2.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((im * 2.0));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((im * 2.0))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(im * 2.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((im * 2.0));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(im * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 40.2%

   \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 79.4%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)} - re\right)} \]

3. Simplified 79.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right) - re\right)}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 52.4%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im}} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 52.4%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]

6. Simplified 52.4%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]

7. Final simplification 52.4%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023201 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.sqrt on complex, imaginary part, im greater than 0 branch"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (> im 0.0)
  (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))