Numeric.SpecFunctions:log1p from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 3.5s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 1.0×

• 24.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * (1.0 - (x * y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * (1.0d0 - (x * y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * (1.0 - (x * y));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * (1.0 - (x * y))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - (x * y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * (1.0 - (x * y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * (1.0d0 - (x * y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * (1.0 - (x * y));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * (1.0 - (x * y))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - (x * y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * (1.0 - (x * y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * (1.0d0 - (x * y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * (1.0 - (x * y));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * (1.0 - (x * y))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - (x * y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot y\right) \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot y\right) \]

Alternative 2: 73.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.3 \cdot 10^{-59} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.3e-59) (not (<= x 3.5e-36))) (* x (* x (- y))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.3e-59) || !(x <= 3.5e-36)) {
		tmp = x * (x * -y);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4.3d-59)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.5d-36))) then
        tmp = x * (x * -y)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.3e-59) || !(x <= 3.5e-36)) {
		tmp = x * (x * -y);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.3e-59) or not (x <= 3.5e-36):
		tmp = x * (x * -y)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.3e-59) || !(x <= 3.5e-36))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(x * Float64(-y)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4.3e-59) || ~((x <= 3.5e-36)))
		tmp = x * (x * -y);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.3e-59], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.5e-36]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.3000000000000003e-59 or 3.5e-36 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot y\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot {x}^{2}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 72.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot {x}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 72.4%

         \[\leadsto -y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 72.4%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      4. associate-*r* 77.9%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 77.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-x \cdot y\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   if -4.3000000000000003e-59 < x < 3.5e-36

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot y\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.3 \cdot 10^{-59} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 51.4% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot y\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 51.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

3. Final simplification 51.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023200 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:log1p from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A"
  :precision binary64
  (* x (- 1.0 (* x y))))