Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.9%

Time: 11.0s

Alternatives: 20

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (+ x y) z) (* z (log t))) (* (- a 0.5) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * Math.log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * math.log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + z) - Float64(z * log(t))) + Float64(Float64(a - 0.5) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (+ x y) z) (* z (log t))) (* (- a 0.5) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * Math.log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * math.log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + z) - Float64(z * log(t))) + Float64(Float64(a - 0.5) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (fma z (- 1.0 (log t)) (fma (+ a -0.5) b y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x + fma(z, (1.0 - log(t)), fma((a + -0.5), b, y));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(x + fma(z, Float64(1.0 - log(t)), fma(Float64(a + -0.5), b, y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x + N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

   4. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

   8. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   11. *-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   12. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

   13. +-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

   14. unsub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

   15. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

   16. sub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   17. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 91.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+92}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_1 \leq 10^{+94}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x + z\right) + t_1\right) - z \cdot \log t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (<= t_1 -1e+92)
     (+ (+ y (+ x z)) t_1)
     (if (<= t_1 1e+94)
       (+ (+ x y) (* z (- 1.0 (log t))))
       (- (+ (+ x z) t_1) (* z (log t)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -1e+92) {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1;
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+94) {
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x + z) + t_1) - (z * log(t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if (t_1 <= (-1d+92)) then
        tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1
    else if (t_1 <= 1d+94) then
        tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0d0 - log(t)))
    else
        tmp = ((x + z) + t_1) - (z * log(t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -1e+92) {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1;
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+94) {
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - Math.log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x + z) + t_1) - (z * Math.log(t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -1e+92:
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1
	elif t_1 <= 1e+94:
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - math.log(t)))
	else:
		tmp = ((x + z) + t_1) - (z * math.log(t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -1e+92)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) + t_1);
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+94)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - log(t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + z) + t_1) - Float64(z * log(t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -1e+92)
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1;
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+94)
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	else
		tmp = ((x + z) + t_1) - (z * log(t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -1e+92], N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+94], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -1e92

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 41.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow2 41.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 41.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   if -1e92 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 1e94

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right) + \left(y + x\right)} \]

   if 1e94 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z + x\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+92}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 10^{+94}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x + z\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 90.4% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+92} \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+39}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -1e+92) (not (<= t_1 2e+39)))
     (+ (+ y (+ x z)) t_1)
     (+ (+ x y) (* z (- 1.0 (log t)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+92) || !(t_1 <= 2e+39)) {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if ((t_1 <= (-1d+92)) .or. (.not. (t_1 <= 2d+39))) then
        tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1
    else
        tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0d0 - log(t)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+92) || !(t_1 <= 2e+39)) {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - Math.log(t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -1e+92) or not (t_1 <= 2e+39):
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - math.log(t)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+92) || !(t_1 <= 2e+39))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - log(t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+92) || ~((t_1 <= 2e+39)))
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -1e+92], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+39]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -1e92 or 1.99999999999999988e39 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow2 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 48.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   if -1e92 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 1.99999999999999988e39

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right) + \left(y + x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+92} \lor \neg \left(b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+39}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* a b) (+ (* -0.5 b) (+ y (+ x z)))) (* z (log t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((a * b) + ((-0.5 * b) + (y + (x + z)))) - (z * log(t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((a * b) + (((-0.5d0) * b) + (y + (x + z)))) - (z * log(t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((a * b) + ((-0.5 * b) + (y + (x + z)))) - (z * Math.log(t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((a * b) + ((-0.5 * b) + (y + (x + z)))) - (z * math.log(t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(-0.5 * b) + Float64(y + Float64(x + z)))) - Float64(z * log(t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((a * b) + ((-0.5 * b) + (y + (x + z)))) - (z * log(t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t \]

Alternative 5: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x y) (- z (* z (log t)))) (* (+ a -0.5) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + y) + (z - (z * log(t)))) + ((a + -0.5) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + y) + (z - (z * log(t)))) + ((a + (-0.5d0)) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + y) + (z - (z * Math.log(t)))) + ((a + -0.5) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + y) + (z - (z * math.log(t)))) + ((a + -0.5) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(z - Float64(z * log(t)))) + Float64(Float64(a + -0.5) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + y) + (z - (z * log(t)))) + ((a + -0.5) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot b \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot b \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b \]

Alternative 6: 85.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+206} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{+165}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -6.5e+206) (not (<= z 2.55e+165)))
   (+ x (* z (- 1.0 (log t))))
   (+ (+ y (+ x z)) (* b (- a 0.5)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.5e+206) || !(z <= 2.55e+165)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-6.5d+206)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.55d+165))) then
        tmp = x + (z * (1.0d0 - log(t)))
    else
        tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.5e+206) || !(z <= 2.55e+165)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - Math.log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -6.5e+206) or not (z <= 2.55e+165):
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - math.log(t)))
	else:
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -6.5e+206) || !(z <= 2.55e+165))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - log(t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) + Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -6.5e+206) || ~((z <= 2.55e+165)))
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	else
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -6.5e+206], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.55e+165]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.4999999999999995e206 or 2.5500000000000002e165 < z

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 76.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \log t\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -6.4999999999999995e206 < z < 2.5500000000000002e165

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 47.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow2 47.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 47.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+206} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{+165}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 85.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+184}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + y\right) - z \cdot \log t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 10^{+164}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -4.5e+184)
   (- (+ z y) (* z (log t)))
   (if (<= z 1e+164)
     (+ (+ y (+ x z)) (* b (- a 0.5)))
     (+ x (* z (- 1.0 (log t)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4.5e+184) {
		tmp = (z + y) - (z * log(t));
	} else if (z <= 1e+164) {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-4.5d+184)) then
        tmp = (z + y) - (z * log(t))
    else if (z <= 1d+164) then
        tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5d0))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (1.0d0 - log(t)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -4.5e+184) {
		tmp = (z + y) - (z * Math.log(t));
	} else if (z <= 1e+164) {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - Math.log(t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -4.5e+184:
		tmp = (z + y) - (z * math.log(t))
	elif z <= 1e+164:
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - math.log(t)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -4.5e+184)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z + y) - Float64(z * log(t)));
	elseif (z <= 1e+164)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) + Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - log(t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -4.5e+184)
		tmp = (z + y) - (z * log(t));
	elseif (z <= 1e+164)
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -4.5e+184], N[(N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1e+164], N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -4.50000000000000036e184

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   if -4.50000000000000036e184 < z < 1e164

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow2 47.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 47.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   if 1e164 < z

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \log t\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+184}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + y\right) - z \cdot \log t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 10^{+164}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 84.7% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{+210} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+209}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.02e+210) (not (<= z 5.4e+209)))
   (* z (- 1.0 (log t)))
   (+ (+ y (+ x z)) (* b (- a 0.5)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.02e+210) || !(z <= 5.4e+209)) {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - log(t));
	} else {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.02d+210)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.4d+209))) then
        tmp = z * (1.0d0 - log(t))
    else
        tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.02e+210) || !(z <= 5.4e+209)) {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - Math.log(t));
	} else {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.02e+210) or not (z <= 5.4e+209):
		tmp = z * (1.0 - math.log(t))
	else:
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.02e+210) || !(z <= 5.4e+209))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - log(t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) + Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.02e+210) || ~((z <= 5.4e+209)))
		tmp = z * (1.0 - log(t));
	else
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.02e+210], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.4e+209]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.02000000000000005e210 or 5.4e209 < z

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - \log t\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -1.02000000000000005e210 < z < 5.4e209

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 46.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow2 46.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 46.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{+210} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+209}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 69.5% accurate, 6.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+117} \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 10^{+94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -2e+117) (not (<= t_1 1e+94))) (+ x t_1) (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -2e+117) || !(t_1 <= 1e+94)) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if ((t_1 <= (-2d+117)) .or. (.not. (t_1 <= 1d+94))) then
        tmp = x + t_1
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -2e+117) || !(t_1 <= 1e+94)) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -2e+117) or not (t_1 <= 1e+94):
		tmp = x + t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -2e+117) || !(t_1 <= 1e+94))
		tmp = Float64(x + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -2e+117) || ~((t_1 <= 1e+94)))
		tmp = x + t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -2e+117], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+94]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -2.0000000000000001e117 or 1e94 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 83.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -2.0000000000000001e117 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 1e94

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 61.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+117} \lor \neg \left(b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 10^{+94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 71.8% accurate, 6.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+184} \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 10^{+94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b + \left(x + y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -5e+184) (not (<= t_1 1e+94)))
     (+ x t_1)
     (+ (* -0.5 b) (+ x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+184) || !(t_1 <= 1e+94)) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + (x + y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if ((t_1 <= (-5d+184)) .or. (.not. (t_1 <= 1d+94))) then
        tmp = x + t_1
    else
        tmp = ((-0.5d0) * b) + (x + y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+184) || !(t_1 <= 1e+94)) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + (x + y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -5e+184) or not (t_1 <= 1e+94):
		tmp = x + t_1
	else:
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + (x + y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+184) || !(t_1 <= 1e+94))
		tmp = Float64(x + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-0.5 * b) + Float64(x + y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+184) || ~((t_1 <= 1e+94)))
		tmp = x + t_1;
	else
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + (x + y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -5e+184], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+94]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -4.9999999999999999e184 or 1e94 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 84.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -4.9999999999999999e184 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 1e94

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot b \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) + \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot b} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 65.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot -0.5} \]

   7. Simplified 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot -0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+184} \lor \neg \left(b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 10^{+94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b + \left(x + y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 65.5% accurate, 6.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+184} \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+105}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -2e+184) (not (<= t_1 2e+105))) t_1 (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -2e+184) || !(t_1 <= 2e+105)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if ((t_1 <= (-2d+184)) .or. (.not. (t_1 <= 2d+105))) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -2e+184) || !(t_1 <= 2e+105)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -2e+184) or not (t_1 <= 2e+105):
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -2e+184) || !(t_1 <= 2e+105))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -2e+184) || ~((t_1 <= 2e+105)))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -2e+184], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+105]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$1, N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -2.00000000000000003e184 or 1.9999999999999999e105 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf 82.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -2.00000000000000003e184 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 1.9999999999999999e105

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 61.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+184} \lor \neg \left(b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+105}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 47.9% accurate, 8.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+107}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+146}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+183} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+239}\right) \land b \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+298}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b -8.2e+107)
   (* -0.5 b)
   (if (<= b 1.15e+146)
     (+ x y)
     (if (or (<= b 1.55e+183) (and (not (<= b 7.8e+239)) (<= b 2.6e+298)))
       (* a b)
       (* -0.5 b)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -8.2e+107) {
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	} else if (b <= 1.15e+146) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if ((b <= 1.55e+183) || (!(b <= 7.8e+239) && (b <= 2.6e+298))) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (b <= (-8.2d+107)) then
        tmp = (-0.5d0) * b
    else if (b <= 1.15d+146) then
        tmp = x + y
    else if ((b <= 1.55d+183) .or. (.not. (b <= 7.8d+239)) .and. (b <= 2.6d+298)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = (-0.5d0) * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -8.2e+107) {
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	} else if (b <= 1.15e+146) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if ((b <= 1.55e+183) || (!(b <= 7.8e+239) && (b <= 2.6e+298))) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if b <= -8.2e+107:
		tmp = -0.5 * b
	elif b <= 1.15e+146:
		tmp = x + y
	elif (b <= 1.55e+183) or (not (b <= 7.8e+239) and (b <= 2.6e+298)):
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = -0.5 * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -8.2e+107)
		tmp = Float64(-0.5 * b);
	elseif (b <= 1.15e+146)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	elseif ((b <= 1.55e+183) || (!(b <= 7.8e+239) && (b <= 2.6e+298)))
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-0.5 * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (b <= -8.2e+107)
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	elseif (b <= 1.15e+146)
		tmp = x + y;
	elseif ((b <= 1.55e+183) || (~((b <= 7.8e+239)) && (b <= 2.6e+298)))
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, -8.2e+107], N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[b, 1.15e+146], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[b, 1.55e+183], And[N[Not[LessEqual[b, 7.8e+239]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[b, 2.6e+298]]], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if b < -8.1999999999999998e107 or 1.5499999999999999e183 < b < 7.7999999999999996e239 or 2.6e298 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 54.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot b} \]

   if -8.1999999999999998e107 < b < 1.15e146

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 57.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y} \]

   if 1.15e146 < b < 1.5499999999999999e183 or 7.7999999999999996e239 < b < 2.6e298

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]

   5. Simplified 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+107}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+146}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+183} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+239}\right) \land b \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+298}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 13: 57.7% accurate, 8.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-112}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(y + -0.5 \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ x y) -5e-112) (+ x (* b (- a 0.5))) (+ (* a b) (+ y (* -0.5 b)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -5e-112) {
		tmp = x + (b * (a - 0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (y + (-0.5 * b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x + y) <= (-5d-112)) then
        tmp = x + (b * (a - 0.5d0))
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (y + ((-0.5d0) * b))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -5e-112) {
		tmp = x + (b * (a - 0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (y + (-0.5 * b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (x + y) <= -5e-112:
		tmp = x + (b * (a - 0.5))
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (y + (-0.5 * b))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= -5e-112)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(y + Float64(-0.5 * b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + y) <= -5e-112)
		tmp = x + (b * (a - 0.5));
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (y + (-0.5 * b));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], -5e-112], N[(x + N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y + N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < -5.00000000000000044e-112

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 49.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -5.00000000000000044e-112 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot b \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + -0.5 \cdot b\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 59.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 55.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-112}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(y + -0.5 \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 14: 28.1% accurate, 10.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-227}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-126}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 7e-227)
   x
   (if (<= y 1.05e-126)
     (* a b)
     (if (<= y 4.6e-14) (* -0.5 b) (if (<= y 4.5e+43) (* a b) y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7e-227) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 1.05e-126) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (y <= 4.6e-14) {
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	} else if (y <= 4.5e+43) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 7d-227) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 1.05d-126) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if (y <= 4.6d-14) then
        tmp = (-0.5d0) * b
    else if (y <= 4.5d+43) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7e-227) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 1.05e-126) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (y <= 4.6e-14) {
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	} else if (y <= 4.5e+43) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 7e-227:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 1.05e-126:
		tmp = a * b
	elif y <= 4.6e-14:
		tmp = -0.5 * b
	elif y <= 4.5e+43:
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 7e-227)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 1.05e-126)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (y <= 4.6e-14)
		tmp = Float64(-0.5 * b);
	elseif (y <= 4.5e+43)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 7e-227)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 1.05e-126)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif (y <= 4.6e-14)
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	elseif (y <= 4.5e+43)
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[y, 7e-227], x, If[LessEqual[y, 1.05e-126], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 4.6e-14], N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 4.5e+43], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], y]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if y < 7.0000000000000002e-227

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 24.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 7.0000000000000002e-227 < y < 1.0499999999999999e-126 or 4.59999999999999996e-14 < y < 4.5e43

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 39.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 39.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]

   5. Simplified 39.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]

   if 1.0499999999999999e-126 < y < 4.59999999999999996e-14

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf 44.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 31.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot b} \]

   if 4.5e43 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 51.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 32.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-227}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-126}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 15: 78.4% accurate, 10.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) + \left(a \cdot b + -0.5 \cdot b\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ x y) (+ (* a b) (* -0.5 b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (x + y) + ((a * b) + (-0.5 * b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (x + y) + ((a * b) + ((-0.5d0) * b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (x + y) + ((a * b) + (-0.5 * b));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (x + y) + ((a * b) + (-0.5 * b))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(-0.5 * b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (x + y) + ((a * b) + (-0.5 * b));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot b \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot b \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 78.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b \]

5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 78.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + -0.5 \cdot b\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 78.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + \left(a \cdot b + -0.5 \cdot b\right) \]

Alternative 16: 79.3% accurate, 10.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ y (+ x z)) (* b (- a 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) + Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 46.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. pow2 46.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

3. Applied egg-rr 46.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

5. Final simplification 79.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \]

Alternative 17: 78.4% accurate, 12.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ x y) (* (+ a -0.5) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (x + y) + ((a + -0.5) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (x + y) + ((a + (-0.5d0)) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (x + y) + ((a + -0.5) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (x + y) + ((a + -0.5) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(Float64(a + -0.5) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (x + y) + ((a + -0.5) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot b \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot b \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 78.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b \]

5. Final simplification 78.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b \]

Alternative 18: 26.9% accurate, 16.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-127}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.7e-127) x (if (<= y 3.3e+37) (* -0.5 b) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.7e-127) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.3e+37) {
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.7d-127) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 3.3d+37) then
        tmp = (-0.5d0) * b
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.7e-127) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.3e+37) {
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.7e-127:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 3.3e+37:
		tmp = -0.5 * b
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.7e-127)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.3e+37)
		tmp = Float64(-0.5 * b);
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.7e-127)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.3e+37)
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.7e-127], x, If[LessEqual[y, 3.3e+37], N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision], y]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 2.7e-127

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 24.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.7e-127 < y < 3.3000000000000001e37

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf 46.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 24.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot b} \]

   if 3.3000000000000001e37 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 30.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-127}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 19: 27.9% accurate, 37.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1.65e+37) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.65e+37) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.65d+37) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.65e+37) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.65e+37:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.65e+37)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.65e+37)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.65e+37], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.65e37

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 25.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.65e37 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 30.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 20: 21.8% accurate, 115.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

   4. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

   8. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   11. *-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   12. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

   13. +-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

   14. unsub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

   15. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

   16. sub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   17. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 21.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 21.8%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.5% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y\right) + \frac{\left(1 - {\log t}^{2}\right) \cdot z}{1 + \log t}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  (+ (+ x y) (/ (* (- 1.0 (pow (log t) 2.0)) z) (+ 1.0 (log t))))
  (* (- a 0.5) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + y) + (((1.0 - pow(log(t), 2.0)) * z) / (1.0 + log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + y) + (((1.0d0 - (log(t) ** 2.0d0)) * z) / (1.0d0 + log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + y) + (((1.0 - Math.pow(Math.log(t), 2.0)) * z) / (1.0 + Math.log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + y) + (((1.0 - math.pow(math.log(t), 2.0)) * z) / (1.0 + math.log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - (log(t) ^ 2.0)) * z) / Float64(1.0 + log(t)))) + Float64(Float64(a - 0.5) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + y) + (((1.0 - (log(t) ^ 2.0)) * z) / (1.0 + log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[(1.0 - N[Power[N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023200 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ (+ (+ x y) (/ (* (- 1.0 (pow (log t) 2.0)) z) (+ 1.0 (log t)))) (* (- a 0.5) b))

  (+ (- (+ (+ x y) z) (* z (log t))) (* (- a 0.5) b)))