expq3 (problem 3.4.2)

Percentage Accurate: 6.5% → 94.7%

Time: 13.9s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 107.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = -2.00000000000000007e154
  2. b = 1.9999999999999999e-154
  3. eps = -1.9999999999999999e-77

Specification

\[-1 < \varepsilon \land \varepsilon < 1\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 6.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 94.7% accurate, 45.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (+ (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (1.0d0 / b) + (1.0d0 / a)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a)

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / b) + Float64(1.0 / a))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 4.2%

   \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 4.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 4.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

   3. expm1-def 5.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 5.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   5. expm1-def 16.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   6. *-commutative 16.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   7. expm1-def 41.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

   8. *-commutative 41.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

3. Simplified 41.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 77.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]

5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 97.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}} \]

6. Final simplification 97.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a} \]

Alternative 2: 57.1% accurate, 34.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-150} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{-18}\right) \land b \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= b 1.85e-150) (and (not (<= b 1.35e-18)) (<= b 8e-11)))
   (/ 1.0 b)
   (/ 1.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b <= 1.85e-150) || (!(b <= 1.35e-18) && (b <= 8e-11))) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((b <= 1.85d-150) .or. (.not. (b <= 1.35d-18)) .and. (b <= 8d-11)) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / b
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b <= 1.85e-150) || (!(b <= 1.35e-18) && (b <= 8e-11))) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if (b <= 1.85e-150) or (not (b <= 1.35e-18) and (b <= 8e-11)):
		tmp = 1.0 / b
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / a
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((b <= 1.85e-150) || (!(b <= 1.35e-18) && (b <= 8e-11)))
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / a);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((b <= 1.85e-150) || (~((b <= 1.35e-18)) && (b <= 8e-11)))
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := If[Or[LessEqual[b, 1.85e-150], And[N[Not[LessEqual[b, 1.35e-18]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[b, 8e-11]]], N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 1.85e-150 or 1.34999999999999994e-18 < b < 7.99999999999999952e-11

   1. Initial program 3.6%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 3.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 3.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

      3. expm1-def 5.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 5.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      5. expm1-def 12.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 12.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      7. expm1-def 38.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 38.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 38.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 55.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

   if 1.85e-150 < b < 1.34999999999999994e-18 or 7.99999999999999952e-11 < b

   1. Initial program 5.2%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 5.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 5.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

      3. expm1-def 6.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 6.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      5. expm1-def 23.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 23.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      7. expm1-def 47.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 47.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 47.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 65.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-150} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{-18}\right) \land b \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 49.0% accurate, 107.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 a))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return 1.0 / a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = 1.0d0 / a
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return 1.0 / a;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return 1.0 / a

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(1.0 / a)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 1.0 / a;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 4.2%

   \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 4.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 4.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

   3. expm1-def 5.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 5.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   5. expm1-def 16.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   6. *-commutative 16.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   7. expm1-def 41.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

   8. *-commutative 41.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

3. Simplified 41.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 51.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]

5. Final simplification 51.6%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{a} \]

Developer target: 78.3% accurate, 45.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a + b}{a \cdot b} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ (+ a b) (* a b)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (a + b) / (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (a + b) / (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (a + b) / (a * b);
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (a + b) / (a * b)

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(a + b) / Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (a + b) / (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023200 
(FPCore (a b eps)
  :name "expq3 (problem 3.4.2)"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (< -1.0 eps) (< eps 1.0))

  :herbie-target
  (/ (+ a b) (* a b))

  (/ (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0)) (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))