FastMath dist3

Percentage Accurate: 97.8% → 100.0%

Time: 3.1s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.9×

• 21.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (* d1 d2) (* (+ d3 5.0) d1)) (* d1 32.0)))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    code = ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0d0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0);
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	return ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0)

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(d1 * d2) + Float64(Float64(d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + Float64(d1 * 32.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0);
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := N[(N[(N[(d1 * d2), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(d3 + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * d1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(d1 * 32.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (* d1 d2) (* (+ d3 5.0) d1)) (* d1 32.0)))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    code = ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0d0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0);
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	return ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0)

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(d1 * d2) + Float64(Float64(d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + Float64(d1 * 32.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0);
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := N[(N[(N[(d1 * d2), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(d3 + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * d1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(d1 * 32.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3) :precision binary64 (* d1 (+ d2 (+ d3 37.0))))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return d1 * (d2 + (d3 + 37.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    code = d1 * (d2 + (d3 + 37.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return d1 * (d2 + (d3 + 37.0));
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	return d1 * (d2 + (d3 + 37.0))

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	return Float64(d1 * Float64(d2 + Float64(d3 + 37.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = d1 * (d2 + (d3 + 37.0));
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := N[(d1 * N[(d2 + N[(d3 + 37.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

   2. distribute-lft-out 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

   3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

   4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

   5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 52.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d2 \leq -2000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;d2 \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;d2 \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{-244} \lor \neg \left(d2 \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{-280}\right) \land d2 \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-274}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot 37\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= d2 -2000000000.0)
   (* d1 d2)
   (if (<= d2 -6.2e-33)
     (* d1 d3)
     (if (or (<= d2 -8.5e-244) (and (not (<= d2 -3.4e-280)) (<= d2 2.9e-274)))
       (* d1 37.0)
       (* d1 d3)))))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d2 <= -2000000000.0) {
		tmp = d1 * d2;
	} else if (d2 <= -6.2e-33) {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	} else if ((d2 <= -8.5e-244) || (!(d2 <= -3.4e-280) && (d2 <= 2.9e-274))) {
		tmp = d1 * 37.0;
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (d2 <= (-2000000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = d1 * d2
    else if (d2 <= (-6.2d-33)) then
        tmp = d1 * d3
    else if ((d2 <= (-8.5d-244)) .or. (.not. (d2 <= (-3.4d-280))) .and. (d2 <= 2.9d-274)) then
        tmp = d1 * 37.0d0
    else
        tmp = d1 * d3
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d2 <= -2000000000.0) {
		tmp = d1 * d2;
	} else if (d2 <= -6.2e-33) {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	} else if ((d2 <= -8.5e-244) || (!(d2 <= -3.4e-280) && (d2 <= 2.9e-274))) {
		tmp = d1 * 37.0;
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	tmp = 0
	if d2 <= -2000000000.0:
		tmp = d1 * d2
	elif d2 <= -6.2e-33:
		tmp = d1 * d3
	elif (d2 <= -8.5e-244) or (not (d2 <= -3.4e-280) and (d2 <= 2.9e-274)):
		tmp = d1 * 37.0
	else:
		tmp = d1 * d3
	return tmp

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (d2 <= -2000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(d1 * d2);
	elseif (d2 <= -6.2e-33)
		tmp = Float64(d1 * d3);
	elseif ((d2 <= -8.5e-244) || (!(d2 <= -3.4e-280) && (d2 <= 2.9e-274)))
		tmp = Float64(d1 * 37.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(d1 * d3);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (d2 <= -2000000000.0)
		tmp = d1 * d2;
	elseif (d2 <= -6.2e-33)
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	elseif ((d2 <= -8.5e-244) || (~((d2 <= -3.4e-280)) && (d2 <= 2.9e-274)))
		tmp = d1 * 37.0;
	else
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := If[LessEqual[d2, -2000000000.0], N[(d1 * d2), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[d2, -6.2e-33], N[(d1 * d3), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[d2, -8.5e-244], And[N[Not[LessEqual[d2, -3.4e-280]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[d2, 2.9e-274]]], N[(d1 * 37.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(d1 * d3), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if d2 < -2e9

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d2 around inf 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d2 \cdot d1} \]

   if -2e9 < d2 < -6.19999999999999994e-33 or -8.4999999999999999e-244 < d2 < -3.3999999999999998e-280 or 2.89999999999999976e-274 < d2

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d3 around inf 47.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot d3} \]

   if -6.19999999999999994e-33 < d2 < -8.4999999999999999e-244 or -3.3999999999999998e-280 < d2 < 2.89999999999999976e-274

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d2 around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(37 + d3\right) \cdot d1} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in d3 around 0 48.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{37 \cdot d1} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d2 \leq -2000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;d2 \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;d2 \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{-244} \lor \neg \left(d2 \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{-280}\right) \land d2 \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-274}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot 37\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 75.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d3 \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= d3 4.1e+39) (* d1 (+ d2 37.0)) (* d1 d3)))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d3 <= 4.1e+39) {
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0);
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (d3 <= 4.1d+39) then
        tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0d0)
    else
        tmp = d1 * d3
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d3 <= 4.1e+39) {
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0);
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	tmp = 0
	if d3 <= 4.1e+39:
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0)
	else:
		tmp = d1 * d3
	return tmp

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (d3 <= 4.1e+39)
		tmp = Float64(d1 * Float64(d2 + 37.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(d1 * d3);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (d3 <= 4.1e+39)
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0);
	else
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := If[LessEqual[d3, 4.1e+39], N[(d1 * N[(d2 + 37.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(d1 * d3), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if d3 < 4.10000000000000004e39

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d3 around 0 68.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)} \]

   if 4.10000000000000004e39 < d3

   1. Initial program 93.1%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 93.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d3 around inf 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot d3} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d3 \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 76.9% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d2 \leq -92000000:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 37\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= d2 -92000000.0) (* d1 (+ d2 37.0)) (* d1 (+ d3 37.0))))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d2 <= -92000000.0) {
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0);
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * (d3 + 37.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (d2 <= (-92000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0d0)
    else
        tmp = d1 * (d3 + 37.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d2 <= -92000000.0) {
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0);
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * (d3 + 37.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	tmp = 0
	if d2 <= -92000000.0:
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0)
	else:
		tmp = d1 * (d3 + 37.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (d2 <= -92000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(d1 * Float64(d2 + 37.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(d1 * Float64(d3 + 37.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (d2 <= -92000000.0)
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0);
	else
		tmp = d1 * (d3 + 37.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := If[LessEqual[d2, -92000000.0], N[(d1 * N[(d2 + 37.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(d1 * N[(d3 + 37.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if d2 < -9.2e7

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d3 around 0 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)} \]

   if -9.2e7 < d2

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d2 around 0 78.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(37 + d3\right) \cdot d1} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d2 \leq -92000000:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 37\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 44.5% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d3 \leq 37:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot 37\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3) :precision binary64 (if (<= d3 37.0) (* d1 37.0) (* d1 d3)))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d3 <= 37.0) {
		tmp = d1 * 37.0;
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (d3 <= 37.0d0) then
        tmp = d1 * 37.0d0
    else
        tmp = d1 * d3
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d3 <= 37.0) {
		tmp = d1 * 37.0;
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	tmp = 0
	if d3 <= 37.0:
		tmp = d1 * 37.0
	else:
		tmp = d1 * d3
	return tmp

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (d3 <= 37.0)
		tmp = Float64(d1 * 37.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(d1 * d3);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (d3 <= 37.0)
		tmp = d1 * 37.0;
	else
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := If[LessEqual[d3, 37.0], N[(d1 * 37.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(d1 * d3), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if d3 < 37

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d2 around 0 63.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(37 + d3\right) \cdot d1} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in d3 around 0 32.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{37 \cdot d1} \]

   if 37 < d3

   1. Initial program 93.6%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d3 around inf 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot d3} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d3 \leq 37:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot 37\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 26.4% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ d1 \cdot 37 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3) :precision binary64 (* d1 37.0))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return d1 * 37.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    code = d1 * 37.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return d1 * 37.0;
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	return d1 * 37.0

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	return Float64(d1 * 37.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = d1 * 37.0;
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := N[(d1 * 37.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

   2. distribute-lft-out 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

   3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

   4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

   5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in d2 around 0 66.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(37 + d3\right) \cdot d1} \]

5. Taylor expanded in d3 around 0 25.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{37 \cdot d1} \]

6. Final simplification 25.4%

   \[\leadsto d1 \cdot 37 \]

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ d1 \cdot \left(\left(37 + d3\right) + d2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3) :precision binary64 (* d1 (+ (+ 37.0 d3) d2)))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return d1 * ((37.0 + d3) + d2);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    code = d1 * ((37.0d0 + d3) + d2)
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return d1 * ((37.0 + d3) + d2);
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	return d1 * ((37.0 + d3) + d2)

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	return Float64(d1 * Float64(Float64(37.0 + d3) + d2))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = d1 * ((37.0 + d3) + d2);
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := N[(d1 * N[(N[(37.0 + d3), $MachinePrecision] + d2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023199 
(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
  :name "FastMath dist3"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (* d1 (+ (+ 37.0 d3) d2))

  (+ (+ (* d1 d2) (* (+ d3 5.0) d1)) (* d1 32.0)))