Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 3.7s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, z\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x 3.0 (fma y 2.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, 3.0, fma(y, 2.0, z));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, 3.0, fma(y, 2.0, z))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * 3.0 + N[(y * 2.0 + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   5. count-2 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + \left(y + y\right)\right) + z\right) \]

   6. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x + \left(\left(y + y\right) + z\right)\right)} \]

   7. associate-+r+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 2 \cdot x\right) + \left(\left(y + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   8. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot x} + \left(\left(y + y\right) + z\right) \]

   9. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)} + \left(\left(y + y\right) + z\right) \]

   10. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 + 1, \left(y + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   11. metadata-eval 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, \left(y + y\right) + z\right) \]

   12. count-2 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2} + z\right) \]

   14. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, z\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, z\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, z\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 52.8% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1000000:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.08 \cdot 10^{-44}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+53}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1000000.0)
   z
   (if (<= z 1.08e-44) (* y 2.0) (if (<= z 7e+53) (* x 3.0) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1000000.0) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 1.08e-44) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 7e+53) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (z <= 1.08d-44) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (z <= 7d+53) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1000000.0) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 1.08e-44) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 7e+53) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1000000.0:
		tmp = z
	elif z <= 1.08e-44:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif z <= 7e+53:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1000000.0)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 1.08e-44)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (z <= 7e+53)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1000000.0)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 1.08e-44)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (z <= 7e+53)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1000000.0], z, If[LessEqual[z, 1.08e-44], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 7e+53], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], z]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1e6 or 7.00000000000000038e53 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -1e6 < z < 1.07999999999999994e-44

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 55.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if 1.07999999999999994e-44 < z < 7.00000000000000038e53

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1000000:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.08 \cdot 10^{-44}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+53}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 85.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1100000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 155000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1100000000.0) (not (<= y 155000.0)))
   (+ z (* y 2.0))
   (+ z (* x 3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1100000000.0) || !(y <= 155000.0)) {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1100000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 155000.0d0))) then
        tmp = z + (y * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1100000000.0) || !(y <= 155000.0)) {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1100000000.0) or not (y <= 155000.0):
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1100000000.0) || !(y <= 155000.0))
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1100000000.0) || ~((y <= 155000.0)))
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1100000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 155000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.1e9 or 155000 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y + z} \]

   if -1.1e9 < y < 155000

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + \left(2 \cdot y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + \left(z + x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. count-2 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + x\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right) + \left(x + x\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} + \left(x + x\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 90.7%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      7. count-2 90.7%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + x\right) \]

      8. distribute-lft1-in 90.7%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      9. metadata-eval 90.7%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{3} \cdot x \]

   7. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1100000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 155000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 79.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+56}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -5.5e+139)
   (* y 2.0)
   (if (<= y 1.05e+56) (+ z (* x 3.0)) (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.5e+139) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (y <= 1.05e+56) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-5.5d+139)) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (y <= 1.05d+56) then
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    else
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.5e+139) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (y <= 1.05e+56) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -5.5e+139:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif y <= 1.05e+56:
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	else:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5.5e+139)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (y <= 1.05e+56)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -5.5e+139)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (y <= 1.05e+56)
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -5.5e+139], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.05e+56], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.4999999999999996e139 or 1.05000000000000009e56 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -5.4999999999999996e139 < y < 1.05000000000000009e56

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + \left(2 \cdot y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + \left(z + x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. count-2 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + x\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right) + \left(x + x\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} + \left(x + x\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 85.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      7. count-2 85.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + x\right) \]

      8. distribute-lft1-in 85.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      9. metadata-eval 85.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{3} \cdot x \]

   7. Simplified 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+56}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(z + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (+ z (* 2.0 (+ x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (z + (2.0d0 * (x + y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(z + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(z + N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. count-2 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(z + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right) \]

Alternative 6: 52.6% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -850000000:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -850000000.0) z (if (<= z 1.95e+31) (* y 2.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -850000000.0) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 1.95e+31) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-850000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (z <= 1.95d+31) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -850000000.0) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 1.95e+31) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -850000000.0:
		tmp = z
	elif z <= 1.95e+31:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -850000000.0)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 1.95e+31)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -850000000.0)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 1.95e+31)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -850000000.0], z, If[LessEqual[z, 1.95e+31], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], z]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8.5e8 or 1.95e31 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -8.5e8 < z < 1.95e31

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 52.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -850000000:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 34.5% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. count-2 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 35.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

5. Final simplification 35.7%

   \[\leadsto z \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023199 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))