Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, A

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 3.9s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{3}{8} \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- x (* (/ 3.0 8.0) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x - ((3.0 / 8.0) * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x - ((3.0d0 / 8.0d0) * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x - ((3.0 / 8.0) * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x - ((3.0 / 8.0) * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(3.0 / 8.0) * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x - ((3.0 / 8.0) * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x - N[(N[(3.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{3}{8} \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- x (* (/ 3.0 8.0) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x - ((3.0 / 8.0) * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x - ((3.0d0 / 8.0d0) * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x - ((3.0 / 8.0) * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x - ((3.0 / 8.0) * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(3.0 / 8.0) * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x - ((3.0 / 8.0) * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x - N[(N[(3.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, -0.375, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (fma y -0.375 x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return fma(y, -0.375, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return fma(y, -0.375, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(y * -0.375 + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x - \frac{3}{8} \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{3}{8} \cdot y\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{3}{8} \cdot y\right) + x} \]

   3. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{3}{8}}\right) + x \]

   4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{3}{8}\right)} + x \]

   5. fma-def 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, -\frac{3}{8}, x\right)} \]

   6. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, -\color{blue}{0.375}, x\right) \]

   7. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-0.375}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, -0.375, x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, -0.375, x\right) \]

Alternative 2: 73.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot -0.375\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot -0.375\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.3e+51) (* y -0.375) (if (<= y 1.8e+57) x (* y -0.375))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.3e+51) {
		tmp = y * -0.375;
	} else if (y <= 1.8e+57) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * -0.375;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.3d+51)) then
        tmp = y * (-0.375d0)
    else if (y <= 1.8d+57) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y * (-0.375d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.3e+51) {
		tmp = y * -0.375;
	} else if (y <= 1.8e+57) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * -0.375;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.3e+51:
		tmp = y * -0.375
	elif y <= 1.8e+57:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y * -0.375
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.3e+51)
		tmp = Float64(y * -0.375);
	elseif (y <= 1.8e+57)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * -0.375);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.3e+51)
		tmp = y * -0.375;
	elseif (y <= 1.8e+57)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y * -0.375;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.3e+51], N[(y * -0.375), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.8e+57], x, N[(y * -0.375), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.3000000000000001e51 or 1.8000000000000001e57 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x - \frac{3}{8} \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{3}{8} \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{3}{8}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{3}{8}\right)} \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{0.375}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{-0.375} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot -0.375} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.375 \cdot y} \]

   if -1.3000000000000001e51 < y < 1.8000000000000001e57

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x - \frac{3}{8} \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{3}{8} \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{3}{8}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{3}{8}\right)} \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{0.375}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{-0.375} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot -0.375} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot -0.375\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot -0.375\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 99.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot -0.375 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y -0.375)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x + (y * -0.375);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x + (y * (-0.375d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x + (y * -0.375);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x + (y * -0.375)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * -0.375))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x + (y * -0.375);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x + N[(y * -0.375), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x - \frac{3}{8} \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{3}{8} \cdot y\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{3}{8}}\right) \]

   3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{3}{8}\right)} \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{0.375}\right) \]

   5. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{-0.375} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot -0.375} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot -0.375 \]

Alternative 4: 50.1% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x - \frac{3}{8} \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{3}{8} \cdot y\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{3}{8}}\right) \]

   3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{3}{8}\right)} \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{0.375}\right) \]

   5. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{-0.375} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot -0.375} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 51.8%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023196 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, A"
  :precision binary64
  (- x (* (/ 3.0 8.0) y)))