SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.8s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (- z x) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, (z - x), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(z - x), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right) + x} \]

   2. fma-def 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right) \]

Alternative 2: 87.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{-72} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-86}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.9e-72) (not (<= z 5.2e-86))) (+ x (* y z)) (* x (- 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.9e-72) || !(z <= 5.2e-86)) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.9d-72)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.2d-86))) then
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.9e-72) || !(z <= 5.2e-86)) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.9e-72) or not (z <= 5.2e-86):
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.9e-72) || !(z <= 5.2e-86))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.9e-72) || ~((z <= 5.2e-86)))
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.9e-72], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.2e-86]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.89999999999999998e-72 or 5.2000000000000002e-86 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 89.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -2.89999999999999998e-72 < z < 5.2000000000000002e-86

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 90.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 90.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. cancel-sign-sub-inv 90.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - y \cdot x} \]

   4. Simplified 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - y \cdot x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{-72} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-86}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 61.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -840000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -840000.0) (not (<= y 1.0))) (* y (- x)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -840000.0) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * -x;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-840000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * -x
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -840000.0) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * -x;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -840000.0) or not (y <= 1.0):
		tmp = y * -x
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -840000.0) || !(y <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-x));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -840000.0) || ~((y <= 1.0)))
		tmp = y * -x;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -840000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * (-x)), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.4e5 or 1 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 50.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. cancel-sign-sub-inv 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - y \cdot x} \]

   4. Simplified 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - y \cdot x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot x\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 50.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot x} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 50.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -8.4e5 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 66.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -840000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

2. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

Alternative 5: 62.5% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * (1.0 - y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * (1.0d0 - y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * (1.0 - y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * (1.0 - y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 59.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 59.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

   2. distribute-rgt1-in 59.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

   3. mul-1-neg 59.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot x \]

   4. cancel-sign-sub-inv 59.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - y \cdot x} \]

4. Simplified 59.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - y \cdot x} \]

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 59.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x} \]

6. Final simplification 59.1%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]

Alternative 6: 37.1% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 34.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

3. Final simplification 34.6%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023196 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (- z x))))