Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5

Percentage Accurate: 71.2% → 95.2%

Time: 12.0s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 71.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 95.2% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -72000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-189}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-302}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (*
          2.0
          (pow (exp (* 0.25 (- (log (- (- y) z)) (log (/ -1.0 x))))) 2.0))))
   (if (<= y -72000000000000.0)
     t_0
     (if (<= y -5.8e-189)
       (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
       (if (<= y 3.7e-302) t_0 (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt y))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = 2.0 * pow(exp((0.25 * (log((-y - z)) - log((-1.0 / x))))), 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -72000000000000.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -5.8e-189) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else if (y <= 3.7e-302) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = 2.0d0 * (exp((0.25d0 * (log((-y - z)) - log(((-1.0d0) / x))))) ** 2.0d0)
    if (y <= (-72000000000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= (-5.8d-189)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else if (y <= 3.7d-302) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = 2.0 * Math.pow(Math.exp((0.25 * (Math.log((-y - z)) - Math.log((-1.0 / x))))), 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -72000000000000.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -5.8e-189) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else if (y <= 3.7e-302) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(z) * Math.sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = 2.0 * math.pow(math.exp((0.25 * (math.log((-y - z)) - math.log((-1.0 / x))))), 2.0)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -72000000000000.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= -5.8e-189:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	elif y <= 3.7e-302:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(z) * math.sqrt(y))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(2.0 * (exp(Float64(0.25 * Float64(log(Float64(Float64(-y) - z)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / x))))) ^ 2.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -72000000000000.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -5.8e-189)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	elseif (y <= 3.7e-302)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = 2.0 * (exp((0.25 * (log((-y - z)) - log((-1.0 / x))))) ^ 2.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -72000000000000.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -5.8e-189)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	elseif (y <= 3.7e-302)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[Exp[N[(0.25 * N[(N[Log[N[((-y) - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -72000000000000.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, -5.8e-189], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 3.7e-302], t$95$0, N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -7.2e13 or -5.8e-189 < y < 3.7e-302

   1. Initial program 62.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 63.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 62.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}}\right)} \]

      2. pow2 62.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}}\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. pow1/2 62.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z\right)}^{0.5}}}\right)}^{2} \]

      4. sqrt-pow1 62.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]

      5. distribute-lft-in 62.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} + y \cdot z\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

      6. associate-+l+ 62.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)\right)}}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

      7. fma-def 62.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)\right)}}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

      8. distribute-rgt-in 62.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

      9. metadata-eval 62.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{\color{blue}{0.25}}\right)}^{2} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 62.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 51.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right) + \log \left(-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot y\right)\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]

   if -7.2e13 < y < -5.8e-189

   1. Initial program 88.7%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 88.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 63.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x}} \]

   if 3.7e-302 < y

   1. Initial program 69.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 69.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 26.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 26.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]

      2. sqrt-prod 35.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 35.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 44.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -72000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-189}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-302}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 93.1% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+19}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right) \cdot -2\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right) + y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -2.5e+19)
   (*
    2.0
    (pow (exp 0.25) (+ (* 2.0 (log (- (- y) z))) (* (log (/ -1.0 x)) -2.0))))
   (if (<= y 2.1e+40)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* z (+ y x)) (* y x))))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt y))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.5e+19) {
		tmp = 2.0 * pow(exp(0.25), ((2.0 * log((-y - z))) + (log((-1.0 / x)) * -2.0)));
	} else if (y <= 2.1e+40) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((z * (y + x)) + (y * x)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-2.5d+19)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (exp(0.25d0) ** ((2.0d0 * log((-y - z))) + (log(((-1.0d0) / x)) * (-2.0d0))))
    else if (y <= 2.1d+40) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((z * (y + x)) + (y * x)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.5e+19) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.pow(Math.exp(0.25), ((2.0 * Math.log((-y - z))) + (Math.log((-1.0 / x)) * -2.0)));
	} else if (y <= 2.1e+40) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((z * (y + x)) + (y * x)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(z) * Math.sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -2.5e+19:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.pow(math.exp(0.25), ((2.0 * math.log((-y - z))) + (math.log((-1.0 / x)) * -2.0)))
	elif y <= 2.1e+40:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt(((z * (y + x)) + (y * x)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(z) * math.sqrt(y))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.5e+19)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * (exp(0.25) ^ Float64(Float64(2.0 * log(Float64(Float64(-y) - z))) + Float64(log(Float64(-1.0 / x)) * -2.0))));
	elseif (y <= 2.1e+40)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(z * Float64(y + x)) + Float64(y * x))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -2.5e+19)
		tmp = 2.0 * (exp(0.25) ^ ((2.0 * log((-y - z))) + (log((-1.0 / x)) * -2.0)));
	elseif (y <= 2.1e+40)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((z * (y + x)) + (y * x)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -2.5e+19], N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[Exp[0.25], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 * N[Log[N[((-y) - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.1e+40], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -2.5e19

   1. Initial program 52.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 52.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 52.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 52.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      4. fma-def 52.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, x + y, x \cdot y\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, x + y, x \cdot y\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 52.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 52.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right) + x \cdot y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1/2 52.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right) + x \cdot y\right)}^{0.5}} \]

      2. +-commutative 52.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}}^{0.5} \]

      3. fma-udef 52.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}}^{0.5} \]

      4. metadata-eval 52.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot 0.25\right)}} \]

      5. pow-sqr 52.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25} \cdot {\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)} \]

      6. pow-prod-down 30.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25}} \]

      7. pow2 30.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{2}\right)}}^{0.25} \]

      8. fma-udef 30.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \]

      9. +-commutative 30.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right) + x \cdot y\right)}}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \]

      10. fma-def 30.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, x + y, x \cdot y\right)\right)}}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 30.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, x + y, x \cdot y\right)\right)}^{2}\right)}^{0.25}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 30.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right) + x \cdot y\right)}}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \]

      2. +-commutative 30.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + x \cdot y\right)}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \]

      3. *-commutative 30.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) \cdot z} + x \cdot y\right)}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \]

      4. fma-def 30.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y + x, z, x \cdot y\right)\right)}}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \]

      5. *-commutative 30.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y + x, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right)}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \]

   9. Simplified 30.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y + x, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)}^{2}\right)}^{0.25}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 20.9%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left({\left(-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot y\right)}^{2}\right) + -2 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. exp-prod 20.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(\log \left({\left(-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot y\right)}^{2}\right) + -2 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}} \]

       2. log-pow 48.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \log \left(-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot y\right)} + -2 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \]

       3. mul-1-neg 48.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \log \left(-1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) + -2 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \]

       4. unsub-neg 48.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z - y\right)} + -2 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \]

       5. neg-mul-1 48.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y\right) + -2 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \]

       6. *-commutative 48.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \log \left(\left(-z\right) - y\right) + \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right) \cdot -2}\right)} \]

   12. Simplified 48.7%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \log \left(\left(-z\right) - y\right) + \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right) \cdot -2\right)}} \]

   if -2.5e19 < y < 2.1000000000000001e40

   1. Initial program 86.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      4. fma-def 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, x + y, x \cdot y\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 86.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, x + y, x \cdot y\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 86.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 86.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

   if 2.1000000000000001e40 < y

   1. Initial program 51.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 51.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 51.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 34.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 34.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]

      2. sqrt-prod 53.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 53.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+19}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right) \cdot -2\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right) + y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 84.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y + x, y \cdot x\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.1e+40)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma z (+ y x) (* y x))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt y)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.1e+40) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(z, (y + x), (y * x)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.1e+40)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(z, Float64(y + x), Float64(y * x))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.1e+40], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.1000000000000001e40

   1. Initial program 76.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 76.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 76.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 76.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      4. fma-def 76.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, x + y, x \cdot y\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, x + y, x \cdot y\right)}} \]

   if 2.1000000000000001e40 < y

   1. Initial program 51.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 51.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 51.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 34.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 34.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]

      2. sqrt-prod 53.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 53.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y + x, y \cdot x\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 84.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.1e+40)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt y)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.1e+40) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.1d+40) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.1e+40) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(z) * Math.sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.1e+40:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(z) * math.sqrt(y))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.1e+40)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(y * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.1e+40)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.1e+40], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.1000000000000001e40

   1. Initial program 76.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 76.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

   if 2.1000000000000001e40 < y

   1. Initial program 51.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 51.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 51.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 34.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 34.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]

      2. sqrt-prod 53.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 53.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 71.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 69.9%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-out 70.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

3. Simplified 70.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

4. Final simplification 70.0%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z} \]

Alternative 6: 71.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right) + y \cdot x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* z (+ y x)) (* y x)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt(((z * (y + x)) + (y * x)));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((z * (y + x)) + (y * x)))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((z * (y + x)) + (y * x)));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt(((z * (y + x)) + (y * x)))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(z * Float64(y + x)) + Float64(y * x))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((z * (y + x)) + (y * x)));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 69.9%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 69.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   2. +-commutative 69.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

   3. distribute-rgt-out 69.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

   4. fma-def 70.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, x + y, x \cdot y\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 70.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, x + y, x \cdot y\right)}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-udef 69.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 69.9%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

6. Final simplification 69.9%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right) + y \cdot x} \]

Alternative 7: 70.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -5.1e-278) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* z (+ y x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.1e-278) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-5.1d-278)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.1e-278) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -5.1e-278:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((z * (y + x)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5.1e-278)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(z * Float64(y + x))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -5.1e-278)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -5.1e-278], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.10000000000000011e-278

   1. Initial program 69.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 69.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 27.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

   if -5.10000000000000011e-278 < y

   1. Initial program 70.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 70.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 47.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 71.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{-286}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.9e-286)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* z (+ y x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.9e-286) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-3.9d-286)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.9e-286) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.9e-286:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((z * (y + x)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.9e-286)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(z * Float64(y + x))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.9e-286)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.9e-286], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.89999999999999995e-286

   1. Initial program 70.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 70.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 53.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x}} \]

   if -3.89999999999999995e-286 < y

   1. Initial program 69.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 69.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 46.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{-286}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 69.0% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-286}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.6e-286) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.6e-286) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-3.6d-286)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.6e-286) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.6e-286:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.6e-286)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.6e-286)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.6e-286], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.60000000000000013e-286

   1. Initial program 70.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 70.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 26.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

   if -3.60000000000000013e-286 < y

   1. Initial program 69.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 69.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

   3. Simplified 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 25.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 26.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-286}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 35.7% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 69.9%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-out 70.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

3. Simplified 70.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 25.9%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

5. Final simplification 25.9%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \]

Developer target: 83.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.25 \cdot \left(\left({y}^{-0.75} \cdot \left({z}^{-0.75} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + {z}^{0.25} \cdot {y}^{0.25}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < 7.636950090573675 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t_0 \cdot t_0\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (+
          (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z)))
          (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))))
   (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y))))
     (* (* t_0 t_0) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((pow(y, -0.75) * (pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (pow(z, 0.25) * pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (0.25d0 * (((y ** (-0.75d0)) * ((z ** (-0.75d0)) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ** 0.25d0) * (y ** 0.25d0))
    if (z < 7.636950090573675d+176) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((Math.pow(y, -0.75) * (Math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (Math.pow(z, 0.25) * Math.pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (0.25 * ((math.pow(y, -0.75) * (math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (math.pow(z, 0.25) * math.pow(y, 0.25))
	tmp = 0
	if z < 7.636950090573675e+176:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(0.25 * Float64(Float64((y ^ -0.75) * Float64((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * Float64(y + z))) + Float64((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) * z) + Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (0.25 * (((y ^ -0.75) * ((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(0.25 * N[(N[(N[Power[y, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[z, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Power[z, 0.25], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[y, 0.25], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, 7.636950090573675e+176], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023196 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176) (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y)))) (* (* (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25))) (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))) 2.0))

  (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))