Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 99.0% → 99.0%
Time: 9.1s
Alternatives: 5
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 5 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
     -1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification99.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 11.7% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* PI (+ (* u 0.5) -0.25))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * ((u * 0.5f) + -0.25f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) + Float32(-0.25))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (single(pi) * ((u * single(0.5)) + single(-0.25)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+10.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--10.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative10.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval10.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval10.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative10.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  6. Simplified10.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u10.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi\right)\right)} \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr10.9%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi\right)\right)} \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  9. Taylor expanded in u around 0 10.9%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative10.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r*10.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \]
    3. *-commutative10.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \pi + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. distribute-rgt-out10.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  11. Simplified10.9%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  12. Final simplification10.9%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 25.2% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(\log s - u \cdot -2\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log s) (* u -2.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (logf(s) - (u * -2.0f));
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = s * (log(s) - (u * (-2.0e0)))
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(log(s) - Float32(u * Float32(-2.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (log(s) - (u * single(-2.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(\log s - u \cdot -2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. fma-def24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. associate--r+24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi}}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    4. cancel-sign-sub-inv24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi}}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out--24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(-0.25 - 0.25\right)} + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    6. *-commutative24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(-0.25 - 0.25\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{-0.5} + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot -0.5 + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    9. *-commutative24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot -0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot 0.25}}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified24.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot -0.5 + \pi \cdot 0.25}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 24.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(\log \left(4 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg24.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \left(\log \left(4 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative24.7%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(4 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right) \cdot s} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-neg-in24.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(4 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
  9. Simplified24.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\pi \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.5, u, 0.25\right) \cdot 4\right)\right) - \log s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
  10. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\log \pi + -2 \cdot u\right)} - \log s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative25.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\log \pi + \color{blue}{u \cdot -2}\right) - \log s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  12. Simplified25.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\log \pi + u \cdot -2\right)} - \log s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  13. Taylor expanded in u around inf 25.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{-2 \cdot u} - \log s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  14. Final simplification25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log s - u \cdot -2\right) \]

Alternative 4: 11.4% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 10.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg10.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified10.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Final simplification10.6%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Alternative 5: 8.9% accurate, 146.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 2.0 (* s u)))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 2.0f * (s * u);
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = 2.0e0 * (s * u)
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(s * u))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(2.0) * (s * u);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. fma-def24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. associate--r+24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi}}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    4. cancel-sign-sub-inv24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi}}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out--24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(-0.25 - 0.25\right)} + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    6. *-commutative24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(-0.25 - 0.25\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{-0.5} + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot -0.5 + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    9. *-commutative24.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot -0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot 0.25}}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified24.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot -0.5 + \pi \cdot 0.25}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 24.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(\log \left(4 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg24.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \left(\log \left(4 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative24.7%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(4 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right) \cdot s} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-neg-in24.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(4 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
  9. Simplified24.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\pi \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.5, u, 0.25\right) \cdot 4\right)\right) - \log s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
  10. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\log \pi + -2 \cdot u\right)} - \log s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative25.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\log \pi + \color{blue}{u \cdot -2}\right) - \log s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  12. Simplified25.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\log \pi + u \cdot -2\right)} - \log s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  13. Taylor expanded in u around inf 9.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)} \]
  14. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative9.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot s\right)} \]
  15. Simplified9.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right)} \]
  16. Final simplification9.3%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023194 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))