Kahan p13 Example 2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 8.1s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.9×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ t_2 := t_1 \cdot t_1\\ \frac{1 + t_2}{2 + t_2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))) (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (+ 1.0 t_2) (+ 2.0 t_2))))

C

double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = (1.0d0 + t_2) / (2.0d0 + t_2)
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Python

def code(t):
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2)

Julia

function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + t_2) / Float64(2.0 + t_2))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ t_2 := t_1 \cdot t_1\\ \frac{1 + t_2}{2 + t_2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))) (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (+ 1.0 t_2) (+ 2.0 t_2))))

C

double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = (1.0d0 + t_2) / (2.0d0 + t_2)
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Python

def code(t):
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2)

Julia

function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + t_2) / Float64(2.0 + t_2))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ t_2 := t_1 \cdot t_1\\ \frac{1 + t_2}{2 + t_2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))) (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (+ 1.0 t_2) (+ 2.0 t_2))))

C

double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = (1.0d0 + t_2) / (2.0d0 + t_2)
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Python

def code(t):
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2)

Julia

function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + t_2) / Float64(2.0 + t_2))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

2. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

Alternative 2: 100.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{\frac{4}{1 + t} + -8}{1 + t}\\ \frac{5 + t_1}{t_1 + 6} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (+ (/ 4.0 (+ 1.0 t)) -8.0) (+ 1.0 t))))
   (/ (+ 5.0 t_1) (+ t_1 6.0))))

C

double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = ((4.0 / (1.0 + t)) + -8.0) / (1.0 + t);
	return (5.0 + t_1) / (t_1 + 6.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    t_1 = ((4.0d0 / (1.0d0 + t)) + (-8.0d0)) / (1.0d0 + t)
    code = (5.0d0 + t_1) / (t_1 + 6.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = ((4.0 / (1.0 + t)) + -8.0) / (1.0 + t);
	return (5.0 + t_1) / (t_1 + 6.0);
}

Python

def code(t):
	t_1 = ((4.0 / (1.0 + t)) + -8.0) / (1.0 + t)
	return (5.0 + t_1) / (t_1 + 6.0)

Julia

function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(4.0 / Float64(1.0 + t)) + -8.0) / Float64(1.0 + t))
	return Float64(Float64(5.0 + t_1) / Float64(t_1 + 6.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = ((4.0 / (1.0 + t)) + -8.0) / (1.0 + t);
	tmp = (5.0 + t_1) / (t_1 + 6.0);
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(4.0 / N[(1.0 + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -8.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(5.0 + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 + 6.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5 + \frac{\frac{4}{1 + t} + -8}{1 + t}}{6 + \frac{\frac{4}{1 + t} + -8}{1 + t}}} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{5 + \frac{\frac{4}{1 + t} + -8}{1 + t}}{\frac{\frac{4}{1 + t} + -8}{1 + t} + 6} \]

Alternative 3: 99.5% accurate, 3.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -0.82 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 0.33\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{0.037037037037037035}{t \cdot t} + \left(0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot t + 0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -0.82) (not (<= t 0.33)))
   (+
    (/ 0.037037037037037035 (* t t))
    (- 0.8333333333333334 (/ 0.2222222222222222 t)))
   (+ (* t t) 0.5)))

C

double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -0.82) || !(t <= 0.33)) {
		tmp = (0.037037037037037035 / (t * t)) + (0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t));
	} else {
		tmp = (t * t) + 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-0.82d0)) .or. (.not. (t <= 0.33d0))) then
        tmp = (0.037037037037037035d0 / (t * t)) + (0.8333333333333334d0 - (0.2222222222222222d0 / t))
    else
        tmp = (t * t) + 0.5d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -0.82) || !(t <= 0.33)) {
		tmp = (0.037037037037037035 / (t * t)) + (0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t));
	} else {
		tmp = (t * t) + 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -0.82) or not (t <= 0.33):
		tmp = (0.037037037037037035 / (t * t)) + (0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t))
	else:
		tmp = (t * t) + 0.5
	return tmp

Julia

function code(t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -0.82) || !(t <= 0.33))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(0.037037037037037035 / Float64(t * t)) + Float64(0.8333333333333334 - Float64(0.2222222222222222 / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t * t) + 0.5);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -0.82) || ~((t <= 0.33)))
		tmp = (0.037037037037037035 / (t * t)) + (0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t));
	else
		tmp = (t * t) + 0.5;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -0.82], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 0.33]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(0.037037037037037035 / N[(t * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.8333333333333334 - N[(0.2222222222222222 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t * t), $MachinePrecision] + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -0.819999999999999951 or 0.330000000000000016 < t

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.037037037037037035 \cdot \frac{1}{{t}^{2}} + 0.8333333333333334\right) - 0.2222222222222222 \cdot \frac{1}{t}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.037037037037037035 \cdot \frac{1}{{t}^{2}} + \left(0.8333333333333334 - 0.2222222222222222 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.037037037037037035 \cdot 1}{{t}^{2}}} + \left(0.8333333333333334 - 0.2222222222222222 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{0.037037037037037035}}{{t}^{2}} + \left(0.8333333333333334 - 0.2222222222222222 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right) \]

      4. unpow2 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{0.037037037037037035}{\color{blue}{t \cdot t}} + \left(0.8333333333333334 - 0.2222222222222222 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right) \]

      5. associate-*r/ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{0.037037037037037035}{t \cdot t} + \left(0.8333333333333334 - \color{blue}{\frac{0.2222222222222222 \cdot 1}{t}}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{0.037037037037037035}{t \cdot t} + \left(0.8333333333333334 - \frac{\color{blue}{0.2222222222222222}}{t}\right) \]

   4. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.037037037037037035}{t \cdot t} + \left(0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222}{t}\right)} \]

   if -0.819999999999999951 < t < 0.330000000000000016

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 + {t}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{t}^{2} + 0.5} \]

      2. unpow2 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot t} + 0.5 \]

   4. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot t + 0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -0.82 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 0.33\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{0.037037037037037035}{t \cdot t} + \left(0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot t + 0.5\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.3% accurate, 5.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -0.78 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 0.55\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot t + 0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -0.78) (not (<= t 0.55)))
   (- 0.8333333333333334 (/ 0.2222222222222222 t))
   (+ (* t t) 0.5)))

C

double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -0.78) || !(t <= 0.55)) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = (t * t) + 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-0.78d0)) .or. (.not. (t <= 0.55d0))) then
        tmp = 0.8333333333333334d0 - (0.2222222222222222d0 / t)
    else
        tmp = (t * t) + 0.5d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -0.78) || !(t <= 0.55)) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = (t * t) + 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -0.78) or not (t <= 0.55):
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t)
	else:
		tmp = (t * t) + 0.5
	return tmp

Julia

function code(t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -0.78) || !(t <= 0.55))
		tmp = Float64(0.8333333333333334 - Float64(0.2222222222222222 / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t * t) + 0.5);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -0.78) || ~((t <= 0.55)))
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t);
	else
		tmp = (t * t) + 0.5;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -0.78], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 0.55]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(0.8333333333333334 - N[(0.2222222222222222 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t * t), $MachinePrecision] + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -0.78000000000000003 or 0.55000000000000004 < t

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around inf 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8333333333333334 - 0.2222222222222222 \cdot \frac{1}{t}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.8333333333333334 - \color{blue}{\frac{0.2222222222222222 \cdot 1}{t}} \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.8333333333333334 - \frac{\color{blue}{0.2222222222222222}}{t} \]

   4. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222}{t}} \]

   if -0.78000000000000003 < t < 0.55000000000000004

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 + {t}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{t}^{2} + 0.5} \]

      2. unpow2 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot t} + 0.5 \]

   4. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot t + 0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -0.78 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 0.55\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot t + 0.5\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 98.8% accurate, 5.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -0.41:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 0.6:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot t + 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -0.41)
   0.8333333333333334
   (if (<= t 0.6) (+ (* t t) 0.5) 0.8333333333333334)))

C

double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -0.41) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	} else if (t <= 0.6) {
		tmp = (t * t) + 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-0.41d0)) then
        tmp = 0.8333333333333334d0
    else if (t <= 0.6d0) then
        tmp = (t * t) + 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = 0.8333333333333334d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -0.41) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	} else if (t <= 0.6) {
		tmp = (t * t) + 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -0.41:
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334
	elif t <= 0.6:
		tmp = (t * t) + 0.5
	else:
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334
	return tmp

Julia

function code(t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -0.41)
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	elseif (t <= 0.6)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t * t) + 0.5);
	else
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -0.41)
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	elseif (t <= 0.6)
		tmp = (t * t) + 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -0.41], 0.8333333333333334, If[LessEqual[t, 0.6], N[(N[(t * t), $MachinePrecision] + 0.5), $MachinePrecision], 0.8333333333333334]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -0.409999999999999976 or 0.599999999999999978 < t

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around inf 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8333333333333334} \]

   if -0.409999999999999976 < t < 0.599999999999999978

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 + {t}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{t}^{2} + 0.5} \]

      2. unpow2 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot t} + 0.5 \]

   4. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot t + 0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -0.41:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 0.6:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot t + 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 98.7% accurate, 10.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -0.33:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -0.33) 0.8333333333333334 (if (<= t 1.0) 0.5 0.8333333333333334)))

C

double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -0.33) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	} else if (t <= 1.0) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-0.33d0)) then
        tmp = 0.8333333333333334d0
    else if (t <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = 0.8333333333333334d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -0.33) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	} else if (t <= 1.0) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -0.33:
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334
	elif t <= 1.0:
		tmp = 0.5
	else:
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334
	return tmp

Julia

function code(t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -0.33)
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	elseif (t <= 1.0)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -0.33)
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	elseif (t <= 1.0)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -0.33], 0.8333333333333334, If[LessEqual[t, 1.0], 0.5, 0.8333333333333334]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -0.330000000000000016 or 1 < t

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around inf 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8333333333333334} \]

   if -0.330000000000000016 < t < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -0.33:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 59.6% accurate, 51.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t) :precision binary64 0.5)

C

double code(double t) {
	return 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	return 0.5;
}

Python

def code(t):
	return 0.5

Julia

function code(t)
	return 0.5
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	tmp = 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := 0.5

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]

2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 54.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]

3. Final simplification 54.3%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023192 
(FPCore (t)
  :name "Kahan p13 Example 2"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (+ 1.0 (* (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))) (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))))) (+ 2.0 (* (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))) (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))))))