Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 3.9s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, z\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x 3.0 (fma y 2.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, 3.0, fma(y, 2.0, z));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, 3.0, fma(y, 2.0, z))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * 3.0 + N[(y * 2.0 + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   5. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + \left(y + y\right)\right) + z\right) \]

   6. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x + \left(\left(y + y\right) + z\right)\right)} \]

   7. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 2 \cdot x\right) + \left(\left(y + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   8. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot x} + \left(\left(y + y\right) + z\right) \]

   9. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)} + \left(\left(y + y\right) + z\right) \]

   10. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 + 1, \left(y + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   11. metadata-eval 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, \left(y + y\right) + z\right) \]

   12. count-2 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2} + z\right) \]

   14. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, z\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, z\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, z\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 52.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -4.8e+118)
   (* x 3.0)
   (if (<= x -2.05e-46)
     z
     (if (<= x 1.65e-24) (* y 2.0) (if (<= x 2.7e+67) z (* x 3.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.8e+118) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (x <= -2.05e-46) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= 1.65e-24) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (x <= 2.7e+67) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-4.8d+118)) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (x <= (-2.05d-46)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (x <= 1.65d-24) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (x <= 2.7d+67) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.8e+118) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (x <= -2.05e-46) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= 1.65e-24) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (x <= 2.7e+67) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -4.8e+118:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif x <= -2.05e-46:
		tmp = z
	elif x <= 1.65e-24:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif x <= 2.7e+67:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -4.8e+118)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (x <= -2.05e-46)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= 1.65e-24)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (x <= 2.7e+67)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -4.8e+118)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (x <= -2.05e-46)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= 1.65e-24)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (x <= 2.7e+67)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -4.8e+118], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -2.05e-46], z, If[LessEqual[x, 1.65e-24], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 2.7e+67], z, N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -4.8e118 or 2.6999999999999999e67 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]

   if -4.8e118 < x < -2.05e-46 or 1.64999999999999992e-24 < x < 2.6999999999999999e67

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -2.05e-46 < x < 1.64999999999999992e-24

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 58.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 84.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.75 \cdot 10^{+38} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+106}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.75e+38) (not (<= x 5.2e+106)))
   (+ z (* x 3.0))
   (+ z (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.75e+38) || !(x <= 5.2e+106)) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.75d+38)) .or. (.not. (x <= 5.2d+106))) then
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    else
        tmp = z + (y * 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.75e+38) || !(x <= 5.2e+106)) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.75e+38) or not (x <= 5.2e+106):
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	else:
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.75e+38) || !(x <= 5.2e+106))
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.75e+38) || ~((x <= 5.2e+106)))
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.75e+38], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5.2e+106]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.7500000000000002e38 or 5.20000000000000039e106 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + \left(z + x\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right) + 2 \cdot x} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 88.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(x + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 88.7%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. metadata-eval 88.7%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{3} \cdot x \]

   6. Simplified 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 3 \cdot x} \]

   if -2.7500000000000002e38 < x < 5.20000000000000039e106

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y + z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.75 \cdot 10^{+38} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+106}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 79.3% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -8.4e+108) (* y 2.0) (if (<= y 9.8e+67) (+ z (* x 3.0)) (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8.4e+108) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (y <= 9.8e+67) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-8.4d+108)) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (y <= 9.8d+67) then
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    else
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8.4e+108) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (y <= 9.8e+67) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -8.4e+108:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif y <= 9.8e+67:
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	else:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -8.4e+108)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (y <= 9.8e+67)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -8.4e+108)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (y <= 9.8e+67)
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -8.4e+108], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 9.8e+67], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.40000000000000039e108 or 9.7999999999999998e67 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -8.40000000000000039e108 < y < 9.7999999999999998e67

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + \left(z + x\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 84.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right) + 2 \cdot x} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 84.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(x + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 84.3%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. metadata-eval 84.3%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{3} \cdot x \]

   6. Simplified 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 84.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+107}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -2.2e+38)
   (+ x (+ z (* x 2.0)))
   (if (<= x 2e+107) (+ z (* y 2.0)) (+ z (* x 3.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.2e+38) {
		tmp = x + (z + (x * 2.0));
	} else if (x <= 2e+107) {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-2.2d+38)) then
        tmp = x + (z + (x * 2.0d0))
    else if (x <= 2d+107) then
        tmp = z + (y * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.2e+38) {
		tmp = x + (z + (x * 2.0));
	} else if (x <= 2e+107) {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.2e+38:
		tmp = x + (z + (x * 2.0))
	elif x <= 2e+107:
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.2e+38)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z + Float64(x * 2.0)));
	elseif (x <= 2e+107)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.2e+38)
		tmp = x + (z + (x * 2.0));
	elseif (x <= 2e+107)
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -2.2e+38], N[(x + N[(z + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 2e+107], N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -2.20000000000000006e38

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x + z\right)} \]

   if -2.20000000000000006e38 < x < 1.9999999999999999e107

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y + z} \]

   if 1.9999999999999999e107 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + \left(z + x\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right) + 2 \cdot x} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(x + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 91.1%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. metadata-eval 91.1%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{3} \cdot x \]

   6. Simplified 91.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z + x \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+107}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(z + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (+ z (* 2.0 (+ x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (z + (2.0d0 * (x + y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(z + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(z + N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(z + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right) \]

Alternative 7: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 3 + \left(z + y \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 3.0) (+ z (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 3.0) + (z + (y * 2.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 3.0d0) + (z + (y * 2.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 3.0) + (z + (y * 2.0));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 3.0) + (z + (y * 2.0))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) + Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 3.0) + (z + (y * 2.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x + \left(2 \cdot y + z\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 3 + \left(z + y \cdot 2\right) \]

Alternative 8: 53.0% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.8e+78) (* y 2.0) (if (<= y 7.5e+65) z (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.8e+78) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (y <= 7.5e+65) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-3.8d+78)) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (y <= 7.5d+65) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.8e+78) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (y <= 7.5e+65) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.8e+78:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif y <= 7.5e+65:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.8e+78)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (y <= 7.5e+65)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.8e+78)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (y <= 7.5e+65)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.8e+78], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 7.5e+65], z, N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.7999999999999999e78 or 7.50000000000000006e65 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 67.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -3.7999999999999999e78 < y < 7.50000000000000006e65

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 45.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 34.7% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 31.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

5. Final simplification 31.7%

   \[\leadsto z \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023192 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))