math.abs on complex (squared)

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%
Time: 1.6s
Alternatives: 5
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ re \cdot re + im \cdot im \end{array} \]
(FPCore modulus_sqr (re im) :precision binary64 (+ (* re re) (* im im)))
double modulus_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return (re * re) + (im * im);
}
real(8) function modulus_sqr(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    modulus_sqr = (re * re) + (im * im)
end function
public static double modulus_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return (re * re) + (im * im);
}
def modulus_sqr(re, im):
	return (re * re) + (im * im)
function modulus_sqr(re, im)
	return Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))
end
function tmp = modulus_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = (re * re) + (im * im);
end
modulus$95$sqr[re_, im_] := N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
re \cdot re + im \cdot im
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 5 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ re \cdot re + im \cdot im \end{array} \]
(FPCore modulus_sqr (re im) :precision binary64 (+ (* re re) (* im im)))
double modulus_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return (re * re) + (im * im);
}
real(8) function modulus_sqr(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    modulus_sqr = (re * re) + (im * im)
end function
public static double modulus_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return (re * re) + (im * im);
}
def modulus_sqr(re, im):
	return (re * re) + (im * im)
function modulus_sqr(re, im)
	return Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))
end
function tmp = modulus_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = (re * re) + (im * im);
end
modulus$95$sqr[re_, im_] := N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
re \cdot re + im \cdot im
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [re, im] = \mathsf{sort}([re, im])\\ \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(re, re, im \cdot im\right) \end{array} \]
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore modulus_sqr (re im) :precision binary64 (fma re re (* im im)))
assert(re < im);
double modulus_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return fma(re, re, (im * im));
}
re, im = sort([re, im])
function modulus_sqr(re, im)
	return fma(re, re, Float64(im * im))
end
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
modulus$95$sqr[re_, im_] := N[(re * re + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
[re, im] = \mathsf{sort}([re, im])\\
\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(re, re, im \cdot im\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[re \cdot re + im \cdot im \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-def100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(re, re, im \cdot im\right)} \]
  3. Simplified100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(re, re, im \cdot im\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification100.0%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(re, re, im \cdot im\right) \]

Alternative 2: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [re, im] = \mathsf{sort}([re, im])\\ \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, re \cdot re\right) \end{array} \]
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore modulus_sqr (re im) :precision binary64 (fma im im (* re re)))
assert(re < im);
double modulus_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return fma(im, im, (re * re));
}
re, im = sort([re, im])
function modulus_sqr(re, im)
	return fma(im, im, Float64(re * re))
end
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
modulus$95$sqr[re_, im_] := N[(im * im + N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
[re, im] = \mathsf{sort}([re, im])\\
\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, re \cdot re\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[re \cdot re + im \cdot im \]
  2. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{re}^{2} + {im}^{2}} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unpow2100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re \cdot re} + {im}^{2} \]
    2. unpow2100.0%

      \[\leadsto re \cdot re + \color{blue}{im \cdot im} \]
    3. +-commutative100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im \cdot im + re \cdot re} \]
    4. fma-def100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, re \cdot re\right)} \]
  4. Simplified100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, re \cdot re\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification100.0%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(im, im, re \cdot re\right) \]

Alternative 3: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [re, im] = \mathsf{sort}([re, im])\\ \\ im \cdot im + re \cdot re \end{array} \]
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore modulus_sqr (re im) :precision binary64 (+ (* im im) (* re re)))
assert(re < im);
double modulus_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return (im * im) + (re * re);
}
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function modulus_sqr(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    modulus_sqr = (im * im) + (re * re)
end function
assert re < im;
public static double modulus_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return (im * im) + (re * re);
}
[re, im] = sort([re, im])
def modulus_sqr(re, im):
	return (im * im) + (re * re)
re, im = sort([re, im])
function modulus_sqr(re, im)
	return Float64(Float64(im * im) + Float64(re * re))
end
re, im = num2cell(sort([re, im])){:}
function tmp = modulus_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = (im * im) + (re * re);
end
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
modulus$95$sqr[re_, im_] := N[(N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision] + N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
[re, im] = \mathsf{sort}([re, im])\\
\\
im \cdot im + re \cdot re
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[re \cdot re + im \cdot im \]
  2. Final simplification100.0%

    \[\leadsto im \cdot im + re \cdot re \]

Alternative 4: 88.3% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [re, im] = \mathsf{sort}([re, im])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-100}:\\ \;\;\;\;re \cdot re\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;im \cdot im\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore modulus_sqr (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= im 1.25e-100) (* re re) (* im im)))
assert(re < im);
double modulus_sqr(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 1.25e-100) {
		tmp = re * re;
	} else {
		tmp = im * im;
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function modulus_sqr(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (im <= 1.25d-100) then
        tmp = re * re
    else
        tmp = im * im
    end if
    modulus_sqr = tmp
end function
assert re < im;
public static double modulus_sqr(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 1.25e-100) {
		tmp = re * re;
	} else {
		tmp = im * im;
	}
	return tmp;
}
[re, im] = sort([re, im])
def modulus_sqr(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if im <= 1.25e-100:
		tmp = re * re
	else:
		tmp = im * im
	return tmp
re, im = sort([re, im])
function modulus_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (im <= 1.25e-100)
		tmp = Float64(re * re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(im * im);
	end
	return tmp
end
re, im = num2cell(sort([re, im])){:}
function tmp_2 = modulus_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (im <= 1.25e-100)
		tmp = re * re;
	else
		tmp = im * im;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
modulus$95$sqr[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[im, 1.25e-100], N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision], N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[re, im] = \mathsf{sort}([re, im])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-100}:\\
\;\;\;\;re \cdot re\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;im \cdot im\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if im < 1.25e-100

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[re \cdot re + im \cdot im \]
    2. Taylor expanded in re around inf 67.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{re}^{2}} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow267.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re \cdot re} \]
    4. Simplified67.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re \cdot re} \]

    if 1.25e-100 < im

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[re \cdot re + im \cdot im \]
    2. Taylor expanded in re around 0 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{im}^{2}} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow275.1%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im \cdot im} \]
    4. Simplified75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im \cdot im} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification69.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-100}:\\ \;\;\;\;re \cdot re\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;im \cdot im\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 56.8% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [re, im] = \mathsf{sort}([re, im])\\ \\ im \cdot im \end{array} \]
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore modulus_sqr (re im) :precision binary64 (* im im))
assert(re < im);
double modulus_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return im * im;
}
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function modulus_sqr(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    modulus_sqr = im * im
end function
assert re < im;
public static double modulus_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return im * im;
}
[re, im] = sort([re, im])
def modulus_sqr(re, im):
	return im * im
re, im = sort([re, im])
function modulus_sqr(re, im)
	return Float64(im * im)
end
re, im = num2cell(sort([re, im])){:}
function tmp = modulus_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = im * im;
end
NOTE: re and im should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
modulus$95$sqr[re_, im_] := N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
[re, im] = \mathsf{sort}([re, im])\\
\\
im \cdot im
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[re \cdot re + im \cdot im \]
  2. Taylor expanded in re around 0 55.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{im}^{2}} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unpow255.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im \cdot im} \]
  4. Simplified55.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im \cdot im} \]
  5. Final simplification55.3%

    \[\leadsto im \cdot im \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023189 
(FPCore modulus_sqr (re im)
  :name "math.abs on complex (squared)"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* re re) (* im im)))