VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (20)

Percentage Accurate: 6.7% → 96.9%
Time: 26.9s
Alternatives: 5
Speedup: 3.3×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\ t_1 := e^{t_0}\\ t_2 := e^{-t_0}\\ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t_1 + t_2}{t_1 - t_2}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (t_1 (exp t_0)) (t_2 (exp (- t_0))))
   (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ t_1 t_2) (- t_1 t_2)))))))
double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (((double) M_PI) / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (Math.PI / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = Math.exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = Math.exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (Math.PI / 4.0)) * Math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}
def code(f):
	t_0 = (math.pi / 4.0) * f
	t_1 = math.exp(t_0)
	t_2 = math.exp(-t_0)
	return -((1.0 / (math.pi / 4.0)) * math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))))
function code(f)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f)
	t_1 = exp(t_0)
	t_2 = exp(Float64(-t_0))
	return Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(pi / 4.0)) * log(Float64(Float64(t_1 + t_2) / Float64(t_1 - t_2)))))
end
function tmp = code(f)
	t_0 = (pi / 4.0) * f;
	t_1 = exp(t_0);
	t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	tmp = -((1.0 / (pi / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
end
code[f_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[Exp[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[Exp[(-t$95$0)], $MachinePrecision]}, (-N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(N[(t$95$1 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\
t_1 := e^{t_0}\\
t_2 := e^{-t_0}\\
-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t_1 + t_2}{t_1 - t_2}\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 5 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 6.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\ t_1 := e^{t_0}\\ t_2 := e^{-t_0}\\ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t_1 + t_2}{t_1 - t_2}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (t_1 (exp t_0)) (t_2 (exp (- t_0))))
   (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ t_1 t_2) (- t_1 t_2)))))))
double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (((double) M_PI) / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (Math.PI / 4.0) * f;
	double t_1 = Math.exp(t_0);
	double t_2 = Math.exp(-t_0);
	return -((1.0 / (Math.PI / 4.0)) * Math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
}
def code(f):
	t_0 = (math.pi / 4.0) * f
	t_1 = math.exp(t_0)
	t_2 = math.exp(-t_0)
	return -((1.0 / (math.pi / 4.0)) * math.log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))))
function code(f)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f)
	t_1 = exp(t_0)
	t_2 = exp(Float64(-t_0))
	return Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(pi / 4.0)) * log(Float64(Float64(t_1 + t_2) / Float64(t_1 - t_2)))))
end
function tmp = code(f)
	t_0 = (pi / 4.0) * f;
	t_1 = exp(t_0);
	t_2 = exp(-t_0);
	tmp = -((1.0 / (pi / 4.0)) * log(((t_1 + t_2) / (t_1 - t_2))));
end
code[f_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[Exp[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[Exp[(-t$95$0)], $MachinePrecision]}, (-N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(N[(t$95$1 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\
t_1 := e^{t_0}\\
t_2 := e^{-t_0}\\
-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{t_1 + t_2}{t_1 - t_2}\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 96.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{-\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25\right) \cdot f\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left({\pi}^{3}, 0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi, f \cdot 0.5, {\pi}^{5} \cdot \left(1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5} \cdot {f}^{5}\right)\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (-
   (log
    (/
     (* 2.0 (cosh (* (* PI 0.25) f)))
     (fma
      (pow PI 3.0)
      (* 0.005208333333333333 (pow f 3.0))
      (fma
       PI
       (* f 0.5)
       (* (pow PI 5.0) (* 1.6276041666666666e-5 (pow f 5.0))))))))
  (* PI 0.25)))
double code(double f) {
	return -log(((2.0 * cosh(((((double) M_PI) * 0.25) * f))) / fma(pow(((double) M_PI), 3.0), (0.005208333333333333 * pow(f, 3.0)), fma(((double) M_PI), (f * 0.5), (pow(((double) M_PI), 5.0) * (1.6276041666666666e-5 * pow(f, 5.0))))))) / (((double) M_PI) * 0.25);
}
function code(f)
	return Float64(Float64(-log(Float64(Float64(2.0 * cosh(Float64(Float64(pi * 0.25) * f))) / fma((pi ^ 3.0), Float64(0.005208333333333333 * (f ^ 3.0)), fma(pi, Float64(f * 0.5), Float64((pi ^ 5.0) * Float64(1.6276041666666666e-5 * (f ^ 5.0)))))))) / Float64(pi * 0.25))
end
code[f_] := N[((-N[Log[N[(N[(2.0 * N[Cosh[N[(N[(Pi * 0.25), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Power[Pi, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(0.005208333333333333 * N[Power[f, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(Pi * N[(f * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Power[Pi, 5.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.6276041666666666e-5 * N[Power[f, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]) / N[(Pi * 0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{-\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25\right) \cdot f\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left({\pi}^{3}, 0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi, f \cdot 0.5, {\pi}^{5} \cdot \left(1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5} \cdot {f}^{5}\right)\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 7.5%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in f around 0 96.9%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{{f}^{5} \cdot \left(8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5} - -8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5}\right) + \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f + {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)\right)}}\right) \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-+r+96.9%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\left({f}^{5} \cdot \left(8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5} - -8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5}\right) + \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right) + {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)}}\right) \]
    2. +-commutative96.9%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{{f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) + \left({f}^{5} \cdot \left(8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5} - -8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5}\right) + \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right)}}\right) \]
    3. *-commutative96.9%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) \cdot {f}^{3}} + \left({f}^{5} \cdot \left(8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5} - -8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5}\right) + \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right)}\right) \]
    4. distribute-rgt-out--96.9%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\left({\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 - -0.0026041666666666665\right)\right)} \cdot {f}^{3} + \left({f}^{5} \cdot \left(8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5} - -8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5}\right) + \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right)}\right) \]
    5. associate-*l*96.9%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{{\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(\left(0.0026041666666666665 - -0.0026041666666666665\right) \cdot {f}^{3}\right)} + \left({f}^{5} \cdot \left(8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5} - -8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5}\right) + \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right)}\right) \]
    6. fma-def96.9%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({\pi}^{3}, \left(0.0026041666666666665 - -0.0026041666666666665\right) \cdot {f}^{3}, {f}^{5} \cdot \left(8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5} - -8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5}\right) + \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right)}}\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval96.9%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left({\pi}^{3}, \color{blue}{0.005208333333333333} \cdot {f}^{3}, {f}^{5} \cdot \left(8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5} - -8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5}\right) + \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f\right)}\right) \]
  4. Simplified96.9%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({\pi}^{3}, 0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi, f \cdot 0.5, {\pi}^{5} \cdot \left(1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5} \cdot {f}^{5}\right)\right)\right)}}\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*l/97.0%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left({\pi}^{3}, 0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi, f \cdot 0.5, {\pi}^{5} \cdot \left(1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5} \cdot {f}^{5}\right)\right)\right)}\right)}{\frac{\pi}{4}}} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr97.0%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25\right) \cdot f\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left({\pi}^{3}, 0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi, f \cdot 0.5, {\pi}^{5} \cdot \left(1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5} \cdot {f}^{5}\right)\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25}} \]
  7. Final simplification97.0%

    \[\leadsto \frac{-\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25\right) \cdot f\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left({\pi}^{3}, 0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi, f \cdot 0.5, {\pi}^{5} \cdot \left(1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5} \cdot {f}^{5}\right)\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25} \]

Alternative 2: 96.7% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25\right) \cdot f\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (/
   (log
    (/
     (* 2.0 (cosh (* (* PI 0.25) f)))
     (fma (* PI 0.5) f (* (pow PI 3.0) (* 0.005208333333333333 (pow f 3.0))))))
   (* PI 0.25))))
double code(double f) {
	return -(log(((2.0 * cosh(((((double) M_PI) * 0.25) * f))) / fma((((double) M_PI) * 0.5), f, (pow(((double) M_PI), 3.0) * (0.005208333333333333 * pow(f, 3.0)))))) / (((double) M_PI) * 0.25));
}
function code(f)
	return Float64(-Float64(log(Float64(Float64(2.0 * cosh(Float64(Float64(pi * 0.25) * f))) / fma(Float64(pi * 0.5), f, Float64((pi ^ 3.0) * Float64(0.005208333333333333 * (f ^ 3.0)))))) / Float64(pi * 0.25)))
end
code[f_] := (-N[(N[Log[N[(N[(2.0 * N[Cosh[N[(N[(Pi * 0.25), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(Pi * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * f + N[(N[Power[Pi, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(0.005208333333333333 * N[Power[f, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[(Pi * 0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25\right) \cdot f\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 7.5%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in f around 0 96.6%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f + {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)}}\right) \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-def96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi, f, {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)\right)}}\right) \]
    2. distribute-rgt-out--96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)}, f, {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. metadata-eval96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}, f, {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    4. *-commutative96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \color{blue}{\left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) \cdot {f}^{3}}\right)}\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out--96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \color{blue}{\left({\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 - -0.0026041666666666665\right)\right)} \cdot {f}^{3}\right)}\right) \]
    6. associate-*l*96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \color{blue}{{\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(\left(0.0026041666666666665 - -0.0026041666666666665\right) \cdot {f}^{3}\right)}\right)}\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{0.005208333333333333} \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right) \]
  4. Simplified96.6%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}}\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*l/96.7%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right)}{\frac{\pi}{4}}} \]
    2. *-un-lft-identity96.7%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right)}}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \]
    3. cosh-undef96.7%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{\log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right)}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \]
    4. div-inv96.7%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \frac{1}{4}\right)} \cdot f\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right)}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \]
    5. metadata-eval96.7%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{0.25}\right) \cdot f\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right)}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \]
    6. div-inv96.7%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25\right) \cdot f\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right)}{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{4}}} \]
    7. metadata-eval96.7%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25\right) \cdot f\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi \cdot \color{blue}{0.25}} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr96.7%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25\right) \cdot f\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25}} \]
  7. Final simplification96.7%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{\log \left(\frac{2 \cdot \cosh \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25\right) \cdot f\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25} \]

Alternative 3: 96.7% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{\pi \cdot f}\right)}{\pi}, \pi \cdot \left(\left(f \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.08333333333333333\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (fma
   4.0
   (/ (log (/ 4.0 (* PI f))) PI)
   (* PI (* (* f f) 0.08333333333333333)))))
double code(double f) {
	return -fma(4.0, (log((4.0 / (((double) M_PI) * f))) / ((double) M_PI)), (((double) M_PI) * ((f * f) * 0.08333333333333333)));
}
function code(f)
	return Float64(-fma(4.0, Float64(log(Float64(4.0 / Float64(pi * f))) / pi), Float64(pi * Float64(Float64(f * f) * 0.08333333333333333))))
end
code[f_] := (-N[(4.0 * N[(N[Log[N[(4.0 / N[(Pi * f), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision] + N[(Pi * N[(N[(f * f), $MachinePrecision] * 0.08333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{\pi \cdot f}\right)}{\pi}, \pi \cdot \left(\left(f \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.08333333333333333\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 7.5%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in f around 0 96.6%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f + {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)}}\right) \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-def96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi, f, {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)\right)}}\right) \]
    2. distribute-rgt-out--96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)}, f, {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. metadata-eval96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}, f, {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    4. *-commutative96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \color{blue}{\left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) \cdot {f}^{3}}\right)}\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out--96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \color{blue}{\left({\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 - -0.0026041666666666665\right)\right)} \cdot {f}^{3}\right)}\right) \]
    6. associate-*l*96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \color{blue}{{\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(\left(0.0026041666666666665 - -0.0026041666666666665\right) \cdot {f}^{3}\right)}\right)}\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{0.005208333333333333} \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right) \]
  4. Simplified96.6%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}}\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in f around 0 96.6%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left({f}^{2} \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot {\left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}^{2} + 0.5 \cdot \left(\left(0.125 \cdot \pi - 0.041666666666666664 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) + \left(0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(\log \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right) + -1 \cdot \log f\right)\right)\right)} \]
  6. Simplified96.5%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\frac{\frac{4}{f}}{\pi}\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \left(f \cdot f\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, {\pi}^{2} \cdot 0.08333333333333333, 0\right), f \cdot 0\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in f around 0 96.6%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333333 \cdot \left({f}^{2} \cdot \pi\right) + 4 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \log f + \log \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right)}{\pi}\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \log f + \log \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right)}{\pi} + 0.08333333333333333 \cdot \left({f}^{2} \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. fma-def96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-1 \cdot \log f + \log \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right)}{\pi}, 0.08333333333333333 \cdot \left({f}^{2} \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  9. Simplified96.7%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{f \cdot \pi}\right)}{\pi}, \pi \cdot \left(\left(f \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.08333333333333333\right)\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification96.7%

    \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{\pi \cdot f}\right)}{\pi}, \pi \cdot \left(\left(f \cdot f\right) \cdot 0.08333333333333333\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 96.2% accurate, 3.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log \left(\frac{\frac{4}{f}}{\pi}\right)}{\pi} \cdot \left(-4\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f) :precision binary64 (* (/ (log (/ (/ 4.0 f) PI)) PI) (- 4.0)))
double code(double f) {
	return (log(((4.0 / f) / ((double) M_PI))) / ((double) M_PI)) * -4.0;
}
public static double code(double f) {
	return (Math.log(((4.0 / f) / Math.PI)) / Math.PI) * -4.0;
}
def code(f):
	return (math.log(((4.0 / f) / math.pi)) / math.pi) * -4.0
function code(f)
	return Float64(Float64(log(Float64(Float64(4.0 / f) / pi)) / pi) * Float64(-4.0))
end
function tmp = code(f)
	tmp = (log(((4.0 / f) / pi)) / pi) * -4.0;
end
code[f_] := N[(N[(N[Log[N[(N[(4.0 / f), $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision] * (-4.0)), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\log \left(\frac{\frac{4}{f}}{\pi}\right)}{\pi} \cdot \left(-4\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 7.5%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in f around 0 95.9%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f}\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt-out--95.9%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)\right)} \cdot f}\right) \]
    2. metadata-eval95.9%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{2}{\left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right) \cdot f}\right) \]
  4. Simplified95.9%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2}{\left(\pi \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot f}\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in f around 0 96.0%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{4 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \log f + \log \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right)}{\pi}} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-196.0%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-\log f\right)} + \log \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right)}{\pi} \]
    2. log-rec96.0%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{f}\right)} + \log \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right)}{\pi} \]
    3. +-commutative96.0%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right) + \log \left(\frac{1}{f}\right)}}{\pi} \]
    4. log-rec96.0%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log f\right)}}{\pi} \]
    5. sub-neg96.0%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right) - \log f}}{\pi} \]
    6. log-div96.0%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\log 4 - \log \pi\right)} - \log f}{\pi} \]
    7. associate--l-95.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\log 4 - \left(\log \pi + \log f\right)}}{\pi} \]
    8. log-prod96.0%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log 4 - \color{blue}{\log \left(\pi \cdot f\right)}}{\pi} \]
    9. *-commutative96.0%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log 4 - \log \color{blue}{\left(f \cdot \pi\right)}}{\pi} \]
    10. log-div96.0%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{4}{f \cdot \pi}\right)}}{\pi} \]
    11. associate-/r*96.0%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\frac{4}{f}}{\pi}\right)}}{\pi} \]
  7. Simplified96.0%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{4 \cdot \frac{\log \left(\frac{\frac{4}{f}}{\pi}\right)}{\pi}} \]
  8. Final simplification96.0%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\frac{\frac{4}{f}}{\pi}\right)}{\pi} \cdot \left(-4\right) \]

Alternative 5: 4.2% accurate, 9.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.08333333333333333 \cdot \left(f \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-f\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f) :precision binary64 (* 0.08333333333333333 (* f (* PI (- f)))))
double code(double f) {
	return 0.08333333333333333 * (f * (((double) M_PI) * -f));
}
public static double code(double f) {
	return 0.08333333333333333 * (f * (Math.PI * -f));
}
def code(f):
	return 0.08333333333333333 * (f * (math.pi * -f))
function code(f)
	return Float64(0.08333333333333333 * Float64(f * Float64(pi * Float64(-f))))
end
function tmp = code(f)
	tmp = 0.08333333333333333 * (f * (pi * -f));
end
code[f_] := N[(0.08333333333333333 * N[(f * N[(Pi * (-f)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0.08333333333333333 \cdot \left(f \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-f\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 7.5%

    \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in f around 0 96.6%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f + {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)}}\right) \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-def96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi, f, {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)\right)}}\right) \]
    2. distribute-rgt-out--96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)}, f, {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. metadata-eval96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}, f, {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    4. *-commutative96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \color{blue}{\left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) \cdot {f}^{3}}\right)}\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out--96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \color{blue}{\left({\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 - -0.0026041666666666665\right)\right)} \cdot {f}^{3}\right)}\right) \]
    6. associate-*l*96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \color{blue}{{\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(\left(0.0026041666666666665 - -0.0026041666666666665\right) \cdot {f}^{3}\right)}\right)}\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval96.6%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{0.005208333333333333} \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}\right) \]
  4. Simplified96.6%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, {\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(0.005208333333333333 \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)}}\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in f around 0 96.6%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left({f}^{2} \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot {\left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}^{2} + 0.5 \cdot \left(\left(0.125 \cdot \pi - 0.041666666666666664 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) + \left(0.5 \cdot \left(f \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(\log \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right) + -1 \cdot \log f\right)\right)\right)} \]
  6. Simplified96.5%

    \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\frac{\frac{4}{f}}{\pi}\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \left(f \cdot f\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, {\pi}^{2} \cdot 0.08333333333333333, 0\right), f \cdot 0\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in f around inf 4.3%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{0.08333333333333333 \cdot \left({f}^{2} \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative4.3%

      \[\leadsto -0.08333333333333333 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot {f}^{2}\right)} \]
    2. unpow24.3%

      \[\leadsto -0.08333333333333333 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{\left(f \cdot f\right)}\right) \]
  9. Simplified4.3%

    \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{0.08333333333333333 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(f \cdot f\right)\right)} \]
  10. Taylor expanded in f around 0 4.3%

    \[\leadsto -0.08333333333333333 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({f}^{2} \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unpow24.3%

      \[\leadsto -0.08333333333333333 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(f \cdot f\right)} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    2. associate-*l*4.3%

      \[\leadsto -0.08333333333333333 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(f \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  12. Simplified4.3%

    \[\leadsto -0.08333333333333333 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(f \cdot \left(f \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  13. Final simplification4.3%

    \[\leadsto 0.08333333333333333 \cdot \left(f \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-f\right)\right)\right) \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023188 
(FPCore (f)
  :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (20)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (exp (- (* (/ PI 4.0) f)))) (- (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (exp (- (* (/ PI 4.0) f)))))))))