math.log/2 on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 52.0% → 99.4%

Time: 20.2s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 2.0×

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{im}{re} \cdot 0}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im base)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (+ (* (log (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))) (log base)) (* (atan2 im re) 0.0))
  (+ (* (log base) (log base)) (* 0.0 0.0))))

C

double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	return ((log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * log(base)) + (atan2(im, re) * 0.0)) / ((log(base) * log(base)) + (0.0 * 0.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im, base)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8), intent (in) :: base
    code = ((log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * log(base)) + (atan2(im, re) * 0.0d0)) / ((log(base) * log(base)) + (0.0d0 * 0.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	return ((Math.log(Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * Math.log(base)) + (Math.atan2(im, re) * 0.0)) / ((Math.log(base) * Math.log(base)) + (0.0 * 0.0));
}

Python

def code(re, im, base):
	return ((math.log(math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * math.log(base)) + (math.atan2(im, re) * 0.0)) / ((math.log(base) * math.log(base)) + (0.0 * 0.0))

Julia

function code(re, im, base)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(log(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im)))) * log(base)) + Float64(atan(im, re) * 0.0)) / Float64(Float64(log(base) * log(base)) + Float64(0.0 * 0.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im, base)
	tmp = ((log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * log(base)) + (atan2(im, re) * 0.0)) / ((log(base) * log(base)) + (0.0 * 0.0));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_, base_] := N[(N[(N[(N[Log[N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[ArcTan[im / re], $MachinePrecision] * 0.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.0 * 0.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 52.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{im}{re} \cdot 0}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im base)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (+ (* (log (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))) (log base)) (* (atan2 im re) 0.0))
  (+ (* (log base) (log base)) (* 0.0 0.0))))

C

double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	return ((log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * log(base)) + (atan2(im, re) * 0.0)) / ((log(base) * log(base)) + (0.0 * 0.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im, base)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8), intent (in) :: base
    code = ((log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * log(base)) + (atan2(im, re) * 0.0d0)) / ((log(base) * log(base)) + (0.0d0 * 0.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	return ((Math.log(Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * Math.log(base)) + (Math.atan2(im, re) * 0.0)) / ((Math.log(base) * Math.log(base)) + (0.0 * 0.0));
}

Python

def code(re, im, base):
	return ((math.log(math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * math.log(base)) + (math.atan2(im, re) * 0.0)) / ((math.log(base) * math.log(base)) + (0.0 * 0.0))

Julia

function code(re, im, base)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(log(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im)))) * log(base)) + Float64(atan(im, re) * 0.0)) / Float64(Float64(log(base) * log(base)) + Float64(0.0 * 0.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im, base)
	tmp = ((log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * log(base)) + (atan2(im, re) * 0.0)) / ((log(base) * log(base)) + (0.0 * 0.0));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_, base_] := N[(N[(N[(N[Log[N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[ArcTan[im / re], $MachinePrecision] * 0.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.0 * 0.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log base} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im base) :precision binary64 (/ (log (hypot re im)) (log base)))

C

double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	return log(hypot(re, im)) / log(base);
}

Java

public static double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	return Math.log(Math.hypot(re, im)) / Math.log(base);
}

Python

def code(re, im, base):
	return math.log(math.hypot(re, im)) / math.log(base)

Julia

function code(re, im, base)
	return Float64(log(hypot(re, im)) / log(base))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im, base)
	tmp = log(hypot(re, im)) / log(base);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_, base_] := N[(N[Log[N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 45.9%

   \[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{im}{re} \cdot 0}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul0-rgt 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \color{blue}{0}}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]

   2. +-rgt-identity 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]

   3. metadata-eval 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}{\log base \cdot \log base + \color{blue}{0}} \]

   4. +-rgt-identity 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}{\color{blue}{\log base \cdot \log base}} \]

   5. times-frac 46.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base} \cdot \frac{\log base}{\log base}} \]

   6. *-inverses 46.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base} \cdot \color{blue}{1} \]

   7. *-rgt-identity 46.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base}} \]

   8. hypot-def 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}{\log base} \]

3. Simplified 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log base}} \]

4. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log base} \]

Alternative 2: 43.7% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -4.9 \cdot 10^{-45}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log \left(-re\right)}{\log base}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log im}{\log base}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im base)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -4.9e-45) (/ (log (- re)) (log base)) (/ (log im) (log base))))

C

double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -4.9e-45) {
		tmp = log(-re) / log(base);
	} else {
		tmp = log(im) / log(base);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im, base)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8), intent (in) :: base
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= (-4.9d-45)) then
        tmp = log(-re) / log(base)
    else
        tmp = log(im) / log(base)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -4.9e-45) {
		tmp = Math.log(-re) / Math.log(base);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(im) / Math.log(base);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im, base):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -4.9e-45:
		tmp = math.log(-re) / math.log(base)
	else:
		tmp = math.log(im) / math.log(base)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im, base)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -4.9e-45)
		tmp = Float64(log(Float64(-re)) / log(base));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(im) / log(base));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im, base)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -4.9e-45)
		tmp = log(-re) / log(base);
	else
		tmp = log(im) / log(base);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_, base_] := If[LessEqual[re, -4.9e-45], N[(N[Log[(-re)], $MachinePrecision] / N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[im], $MachinePrecision] / N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -4.8999999999999998e-45

   1. Initial program 37.1%

      \[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{im}{re} \cdot 0}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul0-rgt 37.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \color{blue}{0}}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]

      2. +-rgt-identity 37.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]

      3. metadata-eval 37.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}{\log base \cdot \log base + \color{blue}{0}} \]

      4. +-rgt-identity 37.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}{\color{blue}{\log base \cdot \log base}} \]

      5. times-frac 37.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base} \cdot \frac{\log base}{\log base}} \]

      6. *-inverses 37.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base} \cdot \color{blue}{1} \]

      7. *-rgt-identity 37.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base}} \]

      8. hypot-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}{\log base} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log base}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\log base}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\log base}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\log base}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\log base}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. div-inv 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\log base \cdot \frac{1}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}} \]

      3. associate-/r* 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{\log base}}{\frac{1}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{\log base}}{\frac{1}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in re around -inf 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{\log base}}{\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{\log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)}}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 58.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\frac{1}{\log base}}{\frac{-1}{\log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)}}\right)\right)} \]

      2. expm1-udef 58.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\frac{1}{\log base}}{\frac{-1}{\log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)}}\right)} - 1} \]

      3. associate-/l/ 58.3%

         \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{-1}{\log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)} \cdot \log base}}\right)} - 1 \]

      4. associate-/r* 58.4%

         \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{\frac{-1}{\log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)}}}{\log base}}\right)} - 1 \]

      5. frac-2neg 58.4%

         \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{--1}{-\log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)}}}}{\log base}\right)} - 1 \]

      6. metadata-eval 58.4%

         \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\frac{1}{\frac{\color{blue}{1}}{-\log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)}}}{\log base}\right)} - 1 \]

      7. remove-double-div 58.4%

         \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{-\log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)}}{\log base}\right)} - 1 \]

      8. neg-log 58.4%

         \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{-1}{re}}\right)}}{\log base}\right)} - 1 \]

      9. clear-num 58.4%

         \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{re}{-1}\right)}}{\log base}\right)} - 1 \]

      10. div-inv 58.4%

          \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(re \cdot \frac{1}{-1}\right)}}{\log base}\right)} - 1 \]

      11. metadata-eval 58.4%

          \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\log \left(re \cdot \color{blue}{-1}\right)}{\log base}\right)} - 1 \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 58.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\log \left(re \cdot -1\right)}{\log base}\right)} - 1} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. expm1-def 58.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\log \left(re \cdot -1\right)}{\log base}\right)\right)} \]

       2. expm1-log1p 76.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(re \cdot -1\right)}{\log base}} \]

       3. *-commutative 76.6%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot re\right)}}{\log base} \]

       4. mul-1-neg 76.6%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(-re\right)}}{\log base} \]

   12. Simplified 76.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(-re\right)}{\log base}} \]

   if -4.8999999999999998e-45 < re

   1. Initial program 49.1%

      \[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{im}{re} \cdot 0}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul0-rgt 49.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \color{blue}{0}}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]

      2. +-rgt-identity 49.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]

      3. metadata-eval 49.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}{\log base \cdot \log base + \color{blue}{0}} \]

      4. +-rgt-identity 49.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}{\color{blue}{\log base \cdot \log base}} \]

      5. times-frac 49.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base} \cdot \frac{\log base}{\log base}} \]

      6. *-inverses 49.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base} \cdot \color{blue}{1} \]

      7. *-rgt-identity 49.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base}} \]

      8. hypot-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}{\log base} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log base}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 29.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log im}{\log base}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 41.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -4.9 \cdot 10^{-45}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log \left(-re\right)}{\log base}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log im}{\log base}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 27.4% accurate, 3.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log im}{\log base} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im base) :precision binary64 (/ (log im) (log base)))

C

double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	return log(im) / log(base);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im, base)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8), intent (in) :: base
    code = log(im) / log(base)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	return Math.log(im) / Math.log(base);
}

Python

def code(re, im, base):
	return math.log(im) / math.log(base)

Julia

function code(re, im, base)
	return Float64(log(im) / log(base))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im, base)
	tmp = log(im) / log(base);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_, base_] := N[(N[Log[im], $MachinePrecision] / N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 45.9%

   \[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{im}{re} \cdot 0}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul0-rgt 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \color{blue}{0}}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]

   2. +-rgt-identity 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]

   3. metadata-eval 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}{\log base \cdot \log base + \color{blue}{0}} \]

   4. +-rgt-identity 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}{\color{blue}{\log base \cdot \log base}} \]

   5. times-frac 46.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base} \cdot \frac{\log base}{\log base}} \]

   6. *-inverses 46.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base} \cdot \color{blue}{1} \]

   7. *-rgt-identity 46.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base}} \]

   8. hypot-def 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}{\log base} \]

3. Simplified 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log base}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 25.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log im}{\log base}} \]

5. Final simplification 25.6%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\log im}{\log base} \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023187 
(FPCore (re im base)
  :name "math.log/2 on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (+ (* (log (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))) (log base)) (* (atan2 im re) 0.0)) (+ (* (log base) (log base)) (* 0.0 0.0))))