Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 6.0s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 29.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right), y, t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma (fma x y z) y t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(fma(x, y, z), y, t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(fma(x, y, z), y, t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y + z), $MachinePrecision] * y + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot y + z, y, t\right)} \]

   2. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right)}, y, t\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right), y, t\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right), y, t\right) \]

Alternative 2: 88.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+66} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -8.2e+66) (not (<= y 4.4e+28)))
   (* y (+ z (* x y)))
   (+ t (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.2e+66) || !(y <= 4.4e+28)) {
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-8.2d+66)) .or. (.not. (y <= 4.4d+28))) then
        tmp = y * (z + (x * y))
    else
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.2e+66) || !(y <= 4.4e+28)) {
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -8.2e+66) or not (y <= 4.4e+28):
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y))
	else:
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -8.2e+66) || !(y <= 4.4e+28))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(x * y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -8.2e+66) || ~((y <= 4.4e+28)))
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y));
	else
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -8.2e+66], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4.4e+28]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.19999999999999989e66 or 4.39999999999999973e28 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + z\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -8.19999999999999989e66 < y < 4.39999999999999973e28

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+66} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 66.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+66} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -8.2e+66) (not (<= y 4.4e+28))) (* y (* x y)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.2e+66) || !(y <= 4.4e+28)) {
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-8.2d+66)) .or. (.not. (y <= 4.4d+28))) then
        tmp = y * (x * y)
    else
        tmp = t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.2e+66) || !(y <= 4.4e+28)) {
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -8.2e+66) or not (y <= 4.4e+28):
		tmp = y * (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -8.2e+66) || !(y <= 4.4e+28))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -8.2e+66) || ~((y <= 4.4e+28)))
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -8.2e+66], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4.4e+28]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.19999999999999989e66 or 4.39999999999999973e28 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + z\right) \cdot y} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot y \]

   if -8.19999999999999989e66 < y < 4.39999999999999973e28

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 60.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+66} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 80.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+67} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.35e+67) (not (<= y 1.1e+38))) (* y (* x y)) (+ t (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.35e+67) || !(y <= 1.1e+38)) {
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.35d+67)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.1d+38))) then
        tmp = y * (x * y)
    else
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.35e+67) || !(y <= 1.1e+38)) {
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.35e+67) or not (y <= 1.1e+38):
		tmp = y * (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.35e+67) || !(y <= 1.1e+38))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.35e+67) || ~((y <= 1.1e+38)))
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	else
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.35e+67], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.1e+38]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.35e67 or 1.10000000000000003e38 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + z\right) \cdot y} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot y \]

   if -1.35e67 < y < 1.10000000000000003e38

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+67} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (* y (+ z (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + (y * (z + (x * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t + (y * (z + (x * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + (y * (z + (x * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t + (y * (z + (x * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(x * y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t + (y * (z + (x * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(y * N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto t + y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right) \]

Alternative 6: 51.8% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.8e+73) (* y z) (if (<= z 1e+118) t (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.8e+73) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 1e+118) {
		tmp = t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.8d+73)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (z <= 1d+118) then
        tmp = t
    else
        tmp = y * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.8e+73) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 1e+118) {
		tmp = t;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.8e+73:
		tmp = y * z
	elif z <= 1e+118:
		tmp = t
	else:
		tmp = y * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.8e+73)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (z <= 1e+118)
		tmp = t;
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.8e+73)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (z <= 1e+118)
		tmp = t;
	else
		tmp = y * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.8e+73], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1e+118], t, N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.7999999999999999e73 or 9.99999999999999967e117 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 80.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + z\right) \cdot y} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y \]

   if -1.7999999999999999e73 < z < 9.99999999999999967e117

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 46.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 38.7% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]

2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 37.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

3. Final simplification 37.4%

   \[\leadsto t \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023185 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))