Examples.Basics.ProofTests:f4 from sbv-4.4

Percentage Accurate: 94.2% → 99.0%

Time: 3.0s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.9×

• 43.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x x) (* (* x 2.0) y)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0d0) * y)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * x) + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) * y)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 94.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x x) (* (* x 2.0) y)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0d0) * y)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * x) + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) * y)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (* x x) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * x) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (x * x) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * x) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (x * x) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (x * x) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.4%

   \[\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} + y \cdot y \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unpow2 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]

4. Simplified 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]

5. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x + y \cdot y \]

Alternative 2: 69.8% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 3.8e-43) (* x (+ x (+ y y))) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.8e-43) {
		tmp = x * (x + (y + y));
	} else {
		tmp = y * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 3.8d-43) then
        tmp = x * (x + (y + y))
    else
        tmp = y * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.8e-43) {
		tmp = x * (x + (y + y));
	} else {
		tmp = y * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 3.8e-43:
		tmp = x * (x + (y + y))
	else:
		tmp = y * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 3.8e-43)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(x + Float64(y + y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 3.8e-43)
		tmp = x * (x + (y + y));
	else
		tmp = y * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, 3.8e-43], N[(x * N[(x + N[(y + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.7999999999999997e-43

   1. Initial program 94.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x + \left(\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y + y \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. fma-def 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y + y \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x \cdot 2 + y\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, y \cdot \left(x \cdot 2 + y\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x + y \cdot \left(x \cdot 2 + y\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 94.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y + y \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y} \]

      4. +-commutative 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y + \left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right)} \]

      5. associate-*l* 94.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot y + \left(x \cdot x + \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      6. distribute-lft-out 97.3%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot y + \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x + 2 \cdot y\right)} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y + x \cdot \left(x + 2 \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 61.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y \cdot x\right) + {x}^{2}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 61.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(y \cdot x\right) + \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

      2. associate-*r* 61.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot x \]

      3. count-2 61.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + y\right)} \cdot x + x \cdot x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 65.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(y + y\right) + x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 65.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 65.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.7999999999999997e-43 < y

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 82.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} \]

   4. Simplified 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 69.5% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 7.5e-41) (* x x) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.5e-41) {
		tmp = x * x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 7.5d-41) then
        tmp = x * x
    else
        tmp = y * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.5e-41) {
		tmp = x * x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 7.5e-41:
		tmp = x * x
	else:
		tmp = y * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 7.5e-41)
		tmp = Float64(x * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 7.5e-41)
		tmp = x * x;
	else
		tmp = y * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, 7.5e-41], N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 7.50000000000000049e-41

   1. Initial program 94.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} + y \cdot y \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]

   4. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 66.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 66.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   7. Simplified 66.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   if 7.50000000000000049e-41 < y

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 82.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} \]

   4. Simplified 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 57.4% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * x

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.4%

   \[\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} + y \cdot y \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unpow2 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]

4. Simplified 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 56.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unpow2 56.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

7. Simplified 56.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

8. Final simplification 56.6%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x \]

Developer target: 94.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot y + \left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (* x x) (+ (* y y) (* (* x y) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * x) + ((y * y) + ((x * y) * 2.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (x * x) + ((y * y) + ((x * y) * 2.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * x) + ((y * y) + ((x * y) * 2.0));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (x * x) + ((y * y) + ((x * y) * 2.0))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) + Float64(Float64(y * y) + Float64(Float64(x * y) * 2.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (x * x) + ((y * y) + ((x * y) * 2.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023185 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Examples.Basics.ProofTests:f4 from sbv-4.4"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ (* x x) (+ (* y y) (* (* x y) 2.0)))

  (+ (+ (* x x) (* (* x 2.0) y)) (* y y)))