Falkner and Boettcher, Equation (22+)

Percentage Accurate: 98.5% → 100.0%

Time: 3.4s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.1×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{4}{\left(\left(3 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (v)
 :precision binary64
 (/ 4.0 (* (* (* 3.0 PI) (- 1.0 (* v v))) (sqrt (- 2.0 (* 6.0 (* v v)))))))

C

double code(double v) {
	return 4.0 / (((3.0 * ((double) M_PI)) * (1.0 - (v * v))) * sqrt((2.0 - (6.0 * (v * v)))));
}

Java

public static double code(double v) {
	return 4.0 / (((3.0 * Math.PI) * (1.0 - (v * v))) * Math.sqrt((2.0 - (6.0 * (v * v)))));
}

Python

def code(v):
	return 4.0 / (((3.0 * math.pi) * (1.0 - (v * v))) * math.sqrt((2.0 - (6.0 * (v * v)))))

Julia

function code(v)
	return Float64(4.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(3.0 * pi) * Float64(1.0 - Float64(v * v))) * sqrt(Float64(2.0 - Float64(6.0 * Float64(v * v))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(v)
	tmp = 4.0 / (((3.0 * pi) * (1.0 - (v * v))) * sqrt((2.0 - (6.0 * (v * v)))));
end

Wolfram

code[v_] := N[(4.0 / N[(N[(N[(3.0 * Pi), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - N[(v * v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 - N[(6.0 * N[(v * v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{4}{\left(\left(3 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (v)
 :precision binary64
 (/ 4.0 (* (* (* 3.0 PI) (- 1.0 (* v v))) (sqrt (- 2.0 (* 6.0 (* v v)))))))

C

double code(double v) {
	return 4.0 / (((3.0 * ((double) M_PI)) * (1.0 - (v * v))) * sqrt((2.0 - (6.0 * (v * v)))));
}

Java

public static double code(double v) {
	return 4.0 / (((3.0 * Math.PI) * (1.0 - (v * v))) * Math.sqrt((2.0 - (6.0 * (v * v)))));
}

Python

def code(v):
	return 4.0 / (((3.0 * math.pi) * (1.0 - (v * v))) * math.sqrt((2.0 - (6.0 * (v * v)))))

Julia

function code(v)
	return Float64(4.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(3.0 * pi) * Float64(1.0 - Float64(v * v))) * sqrt(Float64(2.0 - Float64(6.0 * Float64(v * v))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(v)
	tmp = 4.0 / (((3.0 * pi) * (1.0 - (v * v))) * sqrt((2.0 - (6.0 * (v * v)))));
end

Wolfram

code[v_] := N[(4.0 / N[(N[(N[(3.0 * Pi), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - N[(v * v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 - N[(6.0 * N[(v * v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 + \left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot -6}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (v)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (/ 1.3333333333333333 (* PI (- 1.0 (* v v))))
  (sqrt (+ 2.0 (* (* v v) -6.0)))))

C

double code(double v) {
	return (1.3333333333333333 / (((double) M_PI) * (1.0 - (v * v)))) / sqrt((2.0 + ((v * v) * -6.0)));
}

Java

public static double code(double v) {
	return (1.3333333333333333 / (Math.PI * (1.0 - (v * v)))) / Math.sqrt((2.0 + ((v * v) * -6.0)));
}

Python

def code(v):
	return (1.3333333333333333 / (math.pi * (1.0 - (v * v)))) / math.sqrt((2.0 + ((v * v) * -6.0)))

Julia

function code(v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.3333333333333333 / Float64(pi * Float64(1.0 - Float64(v * v)))) / sqrt(Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(v * v) * -6.0))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(v)
	tmp = (1.3333333333333333 / (pi * (1.0 - (v * v)))) / sqrt((2.0 + ((v * v) * -6.0)));
end

Wolfram

code[v_] := N[(N[(1.3333333333333333 / N[(Pi * N[(1.0 - N[(v * v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 + N[(N[(v * v), $MachinePrecision] * -6.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.5%

   \[\frac{4}{\left(\left(3 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/r* 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{4}{\left(3 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}}} \]

   2. associate-*l* 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{4}{\color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)\right)}}}{\sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}} \]

   3. associate-/r* 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{4}{3}}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}}{\sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}} \]

   4. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{1.3333333333333333}}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}} \]

   5. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{\color{blue}{2 + \left(-6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)\right)}}} \]

   6. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot 6}\right)}} \]

   7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 + \color{blue}{\left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot \left(-6\right)}}} \]

   8. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 + \left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot \color{blue}{-6}}} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 + \left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot -6}}} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 + \left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot -6}} \]

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi}}{\sqrt{2 + \left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot -6}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (v)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (/ 1.3333333333333333 PI) (sqrt (+ 2.0 (* (* v v) -6.0)))))

C

double code(double v) {
	return (1.3333333333333333 / ((double) M_PI)) / sqrt((2.0 + ((v * v) * -6.0)));
}

Java

public static double code(double v) {
	return (1.3333333333333333 / Math.PI) / Math.sqrt((2.0 + ((v * v) * -6.0)));
}

Python

def code(v):
	return (1.3333333333333333 / math.pi) / math.sqrt((2.0 + ((v * v) * -6.0)))

Julia

function code(v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.3333333333333333 / pi) / sqrt(Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(v * v) * -6.0))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(v)
	tmp = (1.3333333333333333 / pi) / sqrt((2.0 + ((v * v) * -6.0)));
end

Wolfram

code[v_] := N[(N[(1.3333333333333333 / Pi), $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 + N[(N[(v * v), $MachinePrecision] * -6.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.5%

   \[\frac{4}{\left(\left(3 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/r* 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{4}{\left(3 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}}} \]

   2. associate-*l* 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{4}{\color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)\right)}}}{\sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}} \]

   3. associate-/r* 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{4}{3}}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}}{\sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}} \]

   4. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{1.3333333333333333}}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}} \]

   5. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{\color{blue}{2 + \left(-6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)\right)}}} \]

   6. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot 6}\right)}} \]

   7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 + \color{blue}{\left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot \left(-6\right)}}} \]

   8. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 + \left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot \color{blue}{-6}}} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)}}{\sqrt{2 + \left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot -6}}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi}}}{\sqrt{2 + \left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot -6}} \]

5. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi}}{\sqrt{2 + \left(v \cdot v\right) \cdot -6}} \]

Alternative 3: 97.5% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{0.5}}{\pi} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (v) :precision binary64 (* 1.3333333333333333 (/ (sqrt 0.5) PI)))

C

double code(double v) {
	return 1.3333333333333333 * (sqrt(0.5) / ((double) M_PI));
}

Java

public static double code(double v) {
	return 1.3333333333333333 * (Math.sqrt(0.5) / Math.PI);
}

Python

def code(v):
	return 1.3333333333333333 * (math.sqrt(0.5) / math.pi)

Julia

function code(v)
	return Float64(1.3333333333333333 * Float64(sqrt(0.5) / pi))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(v)
	tmp = 1.3333333333333333 * (sqrt(0.5) / pi);
end

Wolfram

code[v_] := N[(1.3333333333333333 * N[(N[Sqrt[0.5], $MachinePrecision] / Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.5%

   \[\frac{4}{\left(\left(3 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}} \]

2. Taylor expanded in v around 0 97.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{0.5}}{\pi}} \]

3. Final simplification 97.9%

   \[\leadsto 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{0.5}}{\pi} \]

Alternative 4: 99.0% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi}}{\sqrt{2}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (v) :precision binary64 (/ (/ 1.3333333333333333 PI) (sqrt 2.0)))

C

double code(double v) {
	return (1.3333333333333333 / ((double) M_PI)) / sqrt(2.0);
}

Java

public static double code(double v) {
	return (1.3333333333333333 / Math.PI) / Math.sqrt(2.0);
}

Python

def code(v):
	return (1.3333333333333333 / math.pi) / math.sqrt(2.0)

Julia

function code(v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.3333333333333333 / pi) / sqrt(2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(v)
	tmp = (1.3333333333333333 / pi) / sqrt(2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[v_] := N[(N[(1.3333333333333333 / Pi), $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.5%

   \[\frac{4}{\left(\left(3 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(1 - v \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{2 - 6 \cdot \left(v \cdot v\right)}} \]

2. Taylor expanded in v around 0 97.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{4}{\color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \pi\right)}} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{4}{\color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot \sqrt{2}\right) \cdot \pi}} \]

4. Simplified 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{4}{\color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot \sqrt{2}\right) \cdot \pi}} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-log1p-u 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{4}{\left(3 \cdot \sqrt{2}\right) \cdot \pi}\right)\right)} \]

   2. expm1-udef 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{4}{\left(3 \cdot \sqrt{2}\right) \cdot \pi}\right)} - 1} \]

   3. *-commutative 97.9%

      \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{4}{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(3 \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)}}\right)} - 1 \]

6. Applied egg-rr 97.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{4}{\pi \cdot \left(3 \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)}\right)} - 1} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-def 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{4}{\pi \cdot \left(3 \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)}\right)\right)} \]

   2. expm1-log1p 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{4}{\pi \cdot \left(3 \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)}} \]

   3. associate-*r* 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{4}{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot 3\right) \cdot \sqrt{2}}} \]

   4. associate-/r* 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{4}{\pi \cdot 3}}{\sqrt{2}}} \]

   5. *-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{4}{\color{blue}{3 \cdot \pi}}}{\sqrt{2}} \]

   6. associate-/r* 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{4}{3}}{\pi}}}{\sqrt{2}} \]

   7. metadata-eval 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{1.3333333333333333}}{\pi}}{\sqrt{2}} \]

8. Simplified 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi}}{\sqrt{2}}} \]

9. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{\pi}}{\sqrt{2}} \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023182 
(FPCore (v)
  :name "Falkner and Boettcher, Equation (22+)"
  :precision binary64
  (/ 4.0 (* (* (* 3.0 PI) (- 1.0 (* v v))) (sqrt (- 2.0 (* 6.0 (* v v)))))))