Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 10.1s
Alternatives: 7
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 7 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
     -1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 25.2% accurate, 2.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \pi\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log s) (log PI))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (logf(s) - logf(((float) M_PI)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(log(s) - log(Float32(pi))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (log(s) - log(single(pi)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \pi\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} + 1\right)\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \log s + \log \pi\right)}\right) \]
  7. Final simplification25.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \pi\right) \]

Alternative 3: 25.1% accurate, 3.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log (/ PI s)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((((float) M_PI) / s));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(pi) / s));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} + 1\right)\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \log s + \log \pi\right)}\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log \pi + -1 \cdot \log s\right)}\right) \]
    2. mul-1-neg25.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\log \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)}\right)\right) \]
    3. sub-neg25.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log \pi - \log s\right)}\right) \]
    4. log-div25.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  8. Simplified25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  9. Final simplification25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 25.1% accurate, 3.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log1p (/ PI s)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -log1pf((((float) M_PI) / s));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log1p(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} + 1\right)\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt-neg-out25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right) + 1\right)} \]
    2. +-commutative25.0%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + -4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    3. log1p-udef25.0%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r*25.0%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot -0.25\right) \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval25.0%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{1} \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    6. *-un-lft-identity25.0%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \]
  7. Applied egg-rr25.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-in25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Simplified25.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 24.9% accurate, 3.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \log \left(s \cdot \pi\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (log (* s PI))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * logf((s * ((float) M_PI)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * log(Float32(s * Float32(pi))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * log((s * single(pi)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \log \left(s \cdot \pi\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} + 1\right)\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \log s + \log \pi\right)}\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-sqr-sqrt-0.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-\left(-1 \cdot \log s + \log \pi\right)} \cdot \sqrt{-\left(-1 \cdot \log s + \log \pi\right)}\right)} \]
    2. sqrt-unprod7.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-\left(-1 \cdot \log s + \log \pi\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\left(-1 \cdot \log s + \log \pi\right)\right)}} \]
    3. sqr-neg7.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \log s + \log \pi\right) \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \log s + \log \pi\right)}} \]
    4. sqrt-unprod7.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-1 \cdot \log s + \log \pi} \cdot \sqrt{-1 \cdot \log s + \log \pi}\right)} \]
    5. add-sqr-sqrt7.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \log s + \log \pi\right)} \]
    6. +-commutative7.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \pi + -1 \cdot \log s\right)} \]
    7. distribute-lft-in7.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \log \pi + s \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \log s\right)} \]
    8. add-sqr-sqrt7.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \pi + s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-1 \cdot \log s} \cdot \sqrt{-1 \cdot \log s}\right)} \]
    9. sqrt-unprod7.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \pi + s \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-1 \cdot \log s\right) \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \log s\right)}} \]
    10. mul-1-neg7.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \pi + s \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)} \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \log s\right)} \]
    11. mul-1-neg7.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \pi + s \cdot \sqrt{\left(-\log s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)}} \]
    12. sqr-neg7.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \pi + s \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\log s \cdot \log s}} \]
    13. sqrt-unprod-0.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \pi + s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\log s} \cdot \sqrt{\log s}\right)} \]
    14. add-sqr-sqrt25.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \pi + s \cdot \color{blue}{\log s} \]
  8. Applied egg-rr25.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \log \pi + s \cdot \log s} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \log s + s \cdot \log \pi} \]
    2. distribute-lft-out25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(\log s + \log \pi\right)} \]
    3. log-prod25.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(s \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  10. Simplified25.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \log \left(s \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  11. Final simplification25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \left(s \cdot \pi\right) \]

Alternative 6: 13.2% accurate, 7.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(-\pi\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (* s (- PI))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (s * -((float) M_PI));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(s * Float32(-Float32(pi))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (s * -single(pi));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(-\pi\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} + 1\right)\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt-neg-out11.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}} \]
    2. neg-sub011.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - s \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}} \]
    3. div-inv11.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 - s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)} \]
    4. inv-pow11.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 - s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{{s}^{-1}}\right) \]
    5. exp-to-pow11.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 - s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{e^{\log s \cdot -1}}\right) \]
    6. *-commutative11.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 - s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log s}}\right) \]
    7. add-sqr-sqrt11.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 - s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\sqrt{-1 \cdot \log s} \cdot \sqrt{-1 \cdot \log s}}}\right) \]
    8. sqrt-unprod11.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 - s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-1 \cdot \log s\right) \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \log s\right)}}}\right) \]
    9. mul-1-neg11.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 - s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot e^{\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)} \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \log s\right)}}\right) \]
    10. mul-1-neg11.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 - s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot e^{\sqrt{\left(-\log s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)}}}\right) \]
    11. sqr-neg11.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 - s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot e^{\sqrt{\color{blue}{\log s \cdot \log s}}}\right) \]
    12. sqrt-unprod-0.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 - s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\log s} \cdot \sqrt{\log s}}}\right) \]
    13. add-sqr-sqrt13.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 - s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\log s}}\right) \]
    14. add-exp-log13.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 - s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{s}\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr13.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot s\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-sub013.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot s\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in13.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\pi \cdot s\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative13.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{s \cdot \pi}\right) \]
    4. distribute-rgt-neg-out13.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot \left(-\pi\right)\right)} \]
  10. Simplified13.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(-\pi\right)\right)} \]
  11. Final simplification13.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(-\pi\right)\right) \]

Alternative 7: 11.3% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg11.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified11.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Final simplification11.0%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023182 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))