Disney BSSRDF, sample scattering profile, lower

Percentage Accurate: 61.2% → 99.4%
Time: 8.7s
Alternatives: 11
Speedup: 21.8×

Specification

?
\[\left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 256\right) \land \left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 0.25\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (log (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (* 4.0 u))))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * logf((1.0f / (1.0f - (4.0f * u))));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * log((1.0e0 / (1.0e0 - (4.0e0 * u))))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) - Float32(Float32(4.0) * u)))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * log((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) - (single(4.0) * u))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 11 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 61.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (log (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (* 4.0 u))))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * logf((1.0f / (1.0f - (4.0f * u))));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * log((1.0e0 / (1.0e0 - (4.0e0 * u))))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) - Float32(Float32(4.0) * u)))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * log((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) - (single(4.0) * u))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* (log1p (* u -4.0)) (- s)))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return log1pf((u * -4.0f)) * -s;
}
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(log1p(Float32(u * Float32(-4.0))) * Float32(-s))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 63.1%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative63.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \cdot s} \]
    2. log-rec65.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - 4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot s \]
    3. distribute-lft-neg-out65.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\log \left(1 - 4 \cdot u\right) \cdot s} \]
    4. distribute-rgt-neg-in65.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 - 4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
    5. sub-neg65.2%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    6. log1p-def99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-4 \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    7. *-commutative99.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(-\color{blue}{u \cdot 4}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    8. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(-4\right)}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    9. metadata-eval99.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification99.4%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]

Alternative 2: 91.0% accurate, 6.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)\right) + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (+ (* u (+ 4.0 (* u (* u 21.333333333333332)))) (* u (* u 8.0)))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * ((u * (4.0f + (u * (u * 21.333333333333332f)))) + (u * (u * 8.0f)));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * ((u * (4.0e0 + (u * (u * 21.333333333333332e0)))) + (u * (u * 8.0e0)))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(4.0) + Float32(u * Float32(u * Float32(21.333333333333332))))) + Float32(u * Float32(u * Float32(8.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * ((u * (single(4.0) + (u * (u * single(21.333333333333332))))) + (u * (u * single(8.0))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)\right) + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 63.1%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 90.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + \left(21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3} + 4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-+r+90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right) + 4 \cdot u\right)} \]
    2. +-commutative90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u + \left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot 4} + \left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)\right) \]
    4. unpow290.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(8 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(\color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)\right) \]
    6. unpow390.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot u\right)}\right)\right) \]
    7. unpow290.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{{u}^{2}} \cdot u\right)\right)\right) \]
    8. associate-*r*90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \cdot u}\right)\right) \]
    9. distribute-rgt-out90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(8 \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{2}\right)}\right) \]
    10. distribute-lft-out89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(8 \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{2}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    11. unpow289.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(8 \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]
    12. associate-*r*89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(8 \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(21.333333333333332 \cdot u\right) \cdot u}\right)\right)\right) \]
    13. *-commutative89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(8 \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)} \cdot u\right)\right)\right) \]
    14. distribute-rgt-out89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(8 + u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)}\right)\right) \]
  4. Simplified89.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot \left(8 + u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332 + 8\right)}\right)\right) \]
    2. distribute-lft-in89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right) + u \cdot 8\right)}\right)\right) \]
  6. Applied egg-rr89.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right) + u \cdot 8\right)}\right)\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-+r+89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)\right) + u \cdot 8\right)}\right) \]
    2. *-commutative89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(4 + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)\right) + \color{blue}{8 \cdot u}\right)\right) \]
    3. distribute-rgt-in90.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)\right) \cdot u + \left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u\right)} \]
  8. Applied egg-rr90.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)\right) \cdot u + \left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification90.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)\right) + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 90.9% accurate, 7.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right) + u \cdot 8\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (* u (+ 4.0 (+ (* u (* u 21.333333333333332)) (* u 8.0))))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * (u * (4.0f + ((u * (u * 21.333333333333332f)) + (u * 8.0f))));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * (u * (4.0e0 + ((u * (u * 21.333333333333332e0)) + (u * 8.0e0))))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(u * Float32(Float32(4.0) + Float32(Float32(u * Float32(u * Float32(21.333333333333332))) + Float32(u * Float32(8.0))))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * (u * (single(4.0) + ((u * (u * single(21.333333333333332))) + (u * single(8.0)))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right) + u \cdot 8\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 63.1%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 90.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + \left(21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3} + 4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-+r+90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right) + 4 \cdot u\right)} \]
    2. +-commutative90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u + \left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot 4} + \left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)\right) \]
    4. unpow290.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(8 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(\color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)\right) \]
    6. unpow390.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot u\right)}\right)\right) \]
    7. unpow290.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{{u}^{2}} \cdot u\right)\right)\right) \]
    8. associate-*r*90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \cdot u}\right)\right) \]
    9. distribute-rgt-out90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(8 \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{2}\right)}\right) \]
    10. distribute-lft-out89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(8 \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{2}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    11. unpow289.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(8 \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]
    12. associate-*r*89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(8 \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(21.333333333333332 \cdot u\right) \cdot u}\right)\right)\right) \]
    13. *-commutative89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(8 \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)} \cdot u\right)\right)\right) \]
    14. distribute-rgt-out89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(8 + u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)}\right)\right) \]
  4. Simplified89.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot \left(8 + u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332 + 8\right)}\right)\right) \]
    2. distribute-lft-in89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right) + u \cdot 8\right)}\right)\right) \]
  6. Applied egg-rr89.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right) + u \cdot 8\right)}\right)\right) \]
  7. Final simplification89.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right) + u \cdot 8\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 90.9% accurate, 8.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332 + 8\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (* u (+ 4.0 (* u (+ (* u 21.333333333333332) 8.0))))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * (u * (4.0f + (u * ((u * 21.333333333333332f) + 8.0f))));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * (u * (4.0e0 + (u * ((u * 21.333333333333332e0) + 8.0e0))))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(u * Float32(Float32(4.0) + Float32(u * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(21.333333333333332)) + Float32(8.0))))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * (u * (single(4.0) + (u * ((u * single(21.333333333333332)) + single(8.0)))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332 + 8\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 63.1%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 90.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + \left(21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3} + 4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-+r+90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right) + 4 \cdot u\right)} \]
    2. +-commutative90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u + \left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot 4} + \left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)\right) \]
    4. unpow290.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(8 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(\color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)\right) \]
    6. unpow390.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot u\right)}\right)\right) \]
    7. unpow290.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{{u}^{2}} \cdot u\right)\right)\right) \]
    8. associate-*r*90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \left(\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \cdot u}\right)\right) \]
    9. distribute-rgt-out90.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(8 \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{2}\right)}\right) \]
    10. distribute-lft-out89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(8 \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{2}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    11. unpow289.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(8 \cdot u + 21.333333333333332 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]
    12. associate-*r*89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(8 \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(21.333333333333332 \cdot u\right) \cdot u}\right)\right)\right) \]
    13. *-commutative89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \left(8 \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)} \cdot u\right)\right)\right) \]
    14. distribute-rgt-out89.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(8 + u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)}\right)\right) \]
  4. Simplified89.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot \left(8 + u \cdot 21.333333333333332\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification89.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot \left(u \cdot 21.333333333333332 + 8\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 86.8% accurate, 9.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right) + u \cdot 4\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (+ (* u (* u 8.0)) (* u 4.0))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * ((u * (u * 8.0f)) + (u * 4.0f));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * ((u * (u * 8.0e0)) + (u * 4.0e0))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(u * Float32(8.0))) + Float32(u * Float32(4.0))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * ((u * (u * single(8.0))) + (u * single(4.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right) + u \cdot 4\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 63.1%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 85.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u} + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \]
    2. associate-*r*85.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot {u}^{2}} \]
    3. unpow285.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u + \left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r*85.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(\left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot u} \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out85.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(4 \cdot s + \left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right)} \]
    6. *-commutative85.9%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{s \cdot 4} + \left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right) \]
    7. *-commutative85.9%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot 8\right)} \cdot u\right) \]
    8. associate-*l*85.9%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(8 \cdot u\right)}\right) \]
    9. distribute-lft-out85.7%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot \left(4 + 8 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
    10. *-commutative85.7%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{u \cdot 8}\right)\right) \]
  4. Simplified85.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around 0 85.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(\left(4 + 8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative85.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(4 + 8 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
    2. +-commutative85.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot u + 4\right)}\right) \]
    3. distribute-rgt-in85.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u + 4 \cdot u\right)} \]
  7. Applied egg-rr85.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u + 4 \cdot u\right)} \]
  8. Final simplification85.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right) + u \cdot 4\right) \]

Alternative 6: 86.8% accurate, 9.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ u \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right) + s \cdot 4\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* u (+ (* s (* u 8.0)) (* s 4.0))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return u * ((s * (u * 8.0f)) + (s * 4.0f));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = u * ((s * (u * 8.0e0)) + (s * 4.0e0))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(u * Float32(Float32(s * Float32(u * Float32(8.0))) + Float32(s * Float32(4.0))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = u * ((s * (u * single(8.0))) + (s * single(4.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
u \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right) + s \cdot 4\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 63.1%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 85.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u} + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \]
    2. associate-*r*85.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot {u}^{2}} \]
    3. unpow285.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u + \left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r*85.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(\left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot u} \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out85.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(4 \cdot s + \left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right)} \]
    6. *-commutative85.9%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{s \cdot 4} + \left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right) \]
    7. *-commutative85.9%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot 8\right)} \cdot u\right) \]
    8. associate-*l*85.9%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(8 \cdot u\right)}\right) \]
    9. distribute-lft-out85.7%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot \left(4 + 8 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
    10. *-commutative85.7%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{u \cdot 8}\right)\right) \]
  4. Simplified85.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative85.7%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 8 + 4\right)}\right) \]
    2. distribute-rgt-in85.9%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(u \cdot 8\right) \cdot s + 4 \cdot s\right)} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr85.9%

    \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(u \cdot 8\right) \cdot s + 4 \cdot s\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification85.9%

    \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right) + s \cdot 4\right) \]

Alternative 7: 86.6% accurate, 12.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (* u (+ 4.0 (* u 8.0)))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * (u * (4.0f + (u * 8.0f)));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * (u * (4.0e0 + (u * 8.0e0)))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(u * Float32(Float32(4.0) + Float32(u * Float32(8.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * (u * (single(4.0) + (u * single(8.0))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 63.1%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 85.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 4 \cdot u\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative85.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u + 8 \cdot {u}^{2}\right)} \]
    2. unpow285.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(4 \cdot u + 8 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)}\right) \]
    3. associate-*r*85.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(4 \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u}\right) \]
    4. distribute-rgt-out85.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(4 + 8 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
    5. *-commutative85.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{u \cdot 8}\right)\right) \]
  4. Simplified85.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification85.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right) \]

Alternative 8: 86.6% accurate, 12.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ u \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* u (* s (+ 4.0 (* u 8.0)))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return u * (s * (4.0f + (u * 8.0f)));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = u * (s * (4.0e0 + (u * 8.0e0)))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(u * Float32(s * Float32(Float32(4.0) + Float32(u * Float32(8.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = u * (s * (single(4.0) + (u * single(8.0))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
u \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 63.1%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 85.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u} + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \]
    2. associate-*r*85.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot {u}^{2}} \]
    3. unpow285.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u + \left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r*85.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(\left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot u} \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out85.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(4 \cdot s + \left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right)} \]
    6. *-commutative85.9%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{s \cdot 4} + \left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right) \]
    7. *-commutative85.9%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot 8\right)} \cdot u\right) \]
    8. associate-*l*85.9%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot 4 + \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(8 \cdot u\right)}\right) \]
    9. distribute-lft-out85.7%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot \left(4 + 8 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
    10. *-commutative85.7%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{u \cdot 8}\right)\right) \]
  4. Simplified85.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification85.7%

    \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right) \]

Alternative 9: 73.6% accurate, 21.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* u s)))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return 4.0f * (u * s);
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = 4.0e0 * (u * s)
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(u * s))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (u * s);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 63.1%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 72.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative72.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot s\right)} \]
  4. Simplified72.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification72.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right) \]

Alternative 10: 73.8% accurate, 21.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ u \cdot \left(s \cdot 4\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* u (* s 4.0)))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return u * (s * 4.0f);
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = u * (s * 4.0e0)
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(u * Float32(s * Float32(4.0)))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = u * (s * single(4.0));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
u \cdot \left(s \cdot 4\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 63.1%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 72.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u} \]
    2. *-commutative73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(4 \cdot s\right)} \]
  4. Simplified73.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(4 \cdot s\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification73.0%

    \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot 4\right) \]

Alternative 11: 16.3% accurate, 36.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot 0 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s 0.0))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * 0.0f;
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * 0.0e0
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(0.0))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * single(0.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot 0
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 63.1%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-sqr-sqrt63.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)}\right)} \]
    2. sqrt-unprod63.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)}} \]
    3. log-rec64.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - 4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)} \]
    4. cancel-sign-sub-inv64.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \sqrt{\left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-4\right) \cdot u\right)}\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)} \]
    5. metadata-eval64.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \sqrt{\left(-\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{-4} \cdot u\right)\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)} \]
    6. *-commutative64.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \sqrt{\left(-\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{u \cdot -4}\right)\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)} \]
    7. log1p-udef65.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \sqrt{\left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right)}\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)} \]
    8. log-rec67.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \sqrt{\left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - 4 \cdot u\right)\right)}} \]
    9. cancel-sign-sub-inv67.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \sqrt{\left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-4\right) \cdot u\right)}\right)} \]
    10. metadata-eval67.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \sqrt{\left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{-4} \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
    11. *-commutative67.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \sqrt{\left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{u \cdot -4}\right)\right)} \]
    12. log1p-udef99.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \sqrt{\left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right)}\right)} \]
    13. sqr-neg99.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right)}} \]
    14. sqrt-unprod-0.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right)}\right)} \]
    15. add-sqr-sqrt13.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right)} \]
    16. *-commutative13.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  3. Applied egg-rr16.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{0} \]
  4. Final simplification16.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot 0 \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023181 
(FPCore (s u)
  :name "Disney BSSRDF, sample scattering profile, lower"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 256.0)) (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 0.25)))
  (* s (log (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (* 4.0 u))))))