Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 59.6% → 99.9%

Time: 19.7s

Alternatives: 16

Speedup: 3.0×

• 31.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t_0 \cdot t_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 59.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t_0 \cdot t_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\\ t_1 := \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\\ t_2 := t_0 \cdot t_1\\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - t_2\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-t_1, t_0, t_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (sin (* 0.5 phi1))) (t_1 (sin (* 0.5 phi2))) (t_2 (* t_0 t_1)))
   (*
    R
    (hypot
     (*
      (- lambda1 lambda2)
      (+
       (- (* (cos (* 0.5 phi1)) (cos (* 0.5 phi2))) t_2)
       (fma (- t_1) t_0 t_2)))
     (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = sin((0.5 * phi1));
	double t_1 = sin((0.5 * phi2));
	double t_2 = t_0 * t_1;
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * (((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((0.5 * phi2))) - t_2) + fma(-t_1, t_0, t_2))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1))
	t_1 = sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2))
	t_2 = Float64(t_0 * t_1)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * Float64(Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))) - t_2) + fma(Float64(-t_1), t_0, t_2))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$0 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] + N[((-t$95$1) * t$95$0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cbrt-cube 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. pow3 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. div-inv 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 95.7%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. distribute-lft-in 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2 + 0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. cos-sum 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. rem-cbrt-cube 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. *-un-lft-identity 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. prod-diff 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot 1\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot 1\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

9. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. fma-udef 99.9%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + \left(-\left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right)} + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

    2. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1}\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)} + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

    4. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \color{blue}{\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

    5. *-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

    6. *-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)} - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

    7. *-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \color{blue}{\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

    8. *-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

11. Simplified 99.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

12. Final simplification 99.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (cbrt
     (pow
      (-
       (* (cos (* 0.5 phi1)) (cos (* 0.5 phi2)))
       (* (sin (* 0.5 phi1)) (sin (* 0.5 phi2))))
      3.0)))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cbrt(pow(((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((0.5 * phi2))) - (sin((0.5 * phi1)) * sin((0.5 * phi2)))), 3.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cbrt(Math.pow(((Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))) - (Math.sin((0.5 * phi1)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi2)))), 3.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cbrt((Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))) - Float64(sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2)))) ^ 3.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[N[Power[N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 3.0], $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cbrt-cube 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. pow3 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. div-inv 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 95.7%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. distribute-lft-in 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2 + 0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. cos-sum 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

8. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 3: 87.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-107}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda1 -4e-107)
   (*
    R
    (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (*
    R
    (hypot
     (*
      lambda2
      (-
       (* (sin (* 0.5 phi1)) (sin (* 0.5 phi2)))
       (* (cos (* 0.5 phi1)) (cos (* 0.5 phi2)))))
     (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -4e-107) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda2 * ((sin((0.5 * phi1)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))) - (cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -4e-107) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda2 * ((Math.sin((0.5 * phi1)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi2))) - (Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -4e-107:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda2 * ((math.sin((0.5 * phi1)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi2))) - (math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -4e-107)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda2 * Float64(Float64(sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2))) - Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -4e-107)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda2 * ((sin((0.5 * phi1)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))) - (cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda1, -4e-107], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda2 * N[(N[(N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -4e-107

   1. Initial program 58.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   if -4e-107 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 60.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 95.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 95.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. pow3 95.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. div-inv 95.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 95.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 95.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 95.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 95.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 95.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2 + 0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. cos-sum 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. rem-cbrt-cube 99.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. *-un-lft-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. prod-diff 99.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot 1\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot 1\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. fma-udef 99.9%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + \left(-\left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right)} + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       2. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1}\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       3. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)} + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       4. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \color{blue}{\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       5. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       6. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)} - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       7. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \color{blue}{\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       8. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   11. Simplified 99.9%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   12. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 85.2%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + -1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 85.2%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + -1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       2. *-commutative 85.2%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(-\color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + -1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       3. neg-mul-1 85.2%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(-\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       4. sub-neg 85.2%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(-\lambda_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 85.2%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot \left(-\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       6. neg-sub0 85.2%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   14. Simplified 85.2%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-107}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 92.9% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-49}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 2e-49)
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi2))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2e-49) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2e-49) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 2e-49:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 2e-49)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 2e-49)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 2e-49], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 1.99999999999999987e-49

   1. Initial program 60.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if 1.99999999999999987e-49 < phi2

   1. Initial program 59.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 91.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 90.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-49}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 95.9% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 95.7%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 6: 74.8% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -4.8e-11)
   (* R (hypot (* (cos (* 0.5 phi1)) (- lambda2)) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot phi2 (- lambda1 lambda2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -4.8e-11) {
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -4.8e-11) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -4.8e-11:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -4.8e-11)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * Float64(-lambda2)), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -4.8e-11)
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -4.8e-11], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * (-lambda2)), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -4.8000000000000002e-11

   1. Initial program 53.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 92.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 92.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 83.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 83.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 83.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(-\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_2}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 83.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 83.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -4.8000000000000002e-11 < phi1

   1. Initial program 62.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \cdot R} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 50.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 50.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 50.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      4. hypot-def 70.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 75.1% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -1.05e-10)
   (* R (hypot (* lambda1 (cos (* 0.5 phi1))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot phi2 (- lambda1 lambda2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.05e-10) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.05e-10) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -1.05e-10:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -1.05e-10)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -1.05e-10)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -1.05e-10], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -1.05e-10

   1. Initial program 53.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 92.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 92.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 86.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -1.05e-10 < phi1

   1. Initial program 62.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \cdot R} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 50.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 50.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 50.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      4. hypot-def 70.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 90.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 91.3%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Final simplification 91.3%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 9: 70.4% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+26}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 1.9e+26)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 1.9e+26) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 1.9e+26) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 1.9e+26:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 1.9e+26)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 1.9e+26)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 1.9e+26], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 1.9000000000000001e26

   1. Initial program 60.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 91.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 91.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. div-inv 91.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 91.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 91.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 85.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 52.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 52.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 52.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-def 73.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 73.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   if 1.9000000000000001e26 < phi2

   1. Initial program 56.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 90.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 64.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 69.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      4. mul-1-neg 69.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      5. unsub-neg 69.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+26}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 69.7% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -2.1e-10)
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))
   (* R (hypot phi2 (- lambda1 lambda2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -2.1e-10) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -2.1e-10) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -2.1e-10:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -2.1e-10)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -2.1e-10)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -2.1e-10], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -2.1e-10

   1. Initial program 53.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 92.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 72.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 72.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 72.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 74.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      4. mul-1-neg 74.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      5. unsub-neg 74.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if -2.1e-10 < phi1

   1. Initial program 62.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \cdot R} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 50.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 50.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 50.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      4. hypot-def 70.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 57.5% accurate, 3.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -3.6e-18) (* R (- phi2 phi1)) (* R (hypot phi2 lambda1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -3.6e-18) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, lambda1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -3.6e-18) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, lambda1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -3.6e-18:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, lambda1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -3.6e-18)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, lambda1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -3.6e-18)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, lambda1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -3.6e-18], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + lambda1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -3.6000000000000001e-18

   1. Initial program 53.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 92.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 72.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 72.0%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 73.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      4. mul-1-neg 73.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      5. unsub-neg 73.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if -3.6000000000000001e-18 < phi1

   1. Initial program 62.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 90.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 70.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 35.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\lambda_1}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}} \cdot R} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 35.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\lambda_1}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}}} \]

      2. +-commutative 35.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\lambda_1}^{2}}} \]

      3. unpow2 35.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\lambda_1}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 35.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \lambda_1}} \]

      5. hypot-def 50.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 50.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 28.5% accurate, 32.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-215}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-255}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -1.3e-11)
   (* R (- phi1))
   (if (<= phi1 -4e-215)
     (* R phi2)
     (if (<= phi1 -4.2e-255) (* R (- lambda1)) (* R phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.3e-11) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else if (phi1 <= -4e-215) {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	} else if (phi1 <= -4.2e-255) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi1 <= (-1.3d-11)) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else if (phi1 <= (-4d-215)) then
        tmp = r * phi2
    else if (phi1 <= (-4.2d-255)) then
        tmp = r * -lambda1
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.3e-11) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else if (phi1 <= -4e-215) {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	} else if (phi1 <= -4.2e-255) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -1.3e-11:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	elif phi1 <= -4e-215:
		tmp = R * phi2
	elif phi1 <= -4.2e-255:
		tmp = R * -lambda1
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -1.3e-11)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	elseif (phi1 <= -4e-215)
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	elseif (phi1 <= -4.2e-255)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-lambda1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -1.3e-11)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	elseif (phi1 <= -4e-215)
		tmp = R * phi2;
	elseif (phi1 <= -4.2e-255)
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -1.3e-11], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[phi1, -4e-215], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[phi1, -4.2e-255], N[(R * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if phi1 < -1.3e-11

   1. Initial program 53.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 92.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 67.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 67.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot R} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 67.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)} \cdot R \]

   6. Simplified 67.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot R} \]

   if -1.3e-11 < phi1 < -4.00000000000000017e-215 or -4.1999999999999999e-255 < phi1

   1. Initial program 62.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 19.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 19.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   6. Simplified 19.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   if -4.00000000000000017e-215 < phi1 < -4.1999999999999999e-255

   1. Initial program 59.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 88.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 24.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 24.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 24.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 24.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 24.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 24.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \lambda_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 24.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in 24.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right) \cdot R} \]

   10. Simplified 24.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right) \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 31.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-215}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-255}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 13: 32.4% accurate, 46.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+254}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda1 -6.2e+254) (* R (- lambda1)) (* R (- phi2 phi1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -6.2e+254) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda1 <= (-6.2d+254)) then
        tmp = r * -lambda1
    else
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -6.2e+254) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -6.2e+254:
		tmp = R * -lambda1
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -6.2e+254)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-lambda1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -6.2e+254)
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda1, -6.2e+254], N[(R * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -6.2000000000000004e254

   1. Initial program 44.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 97.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 61.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 61.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 61.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 61.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \lambda_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 66.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right) \cdot R} \]

   10. Simplified 66.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right) \cdot R} \]

   if -6.2000000000000004e254 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 60.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 95.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 30.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 30.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 30.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 31.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      4. mul-1-neg 31.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      5. unsub-neg 31.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 31.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 33.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+254}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 14: 27.1% accurate, 54.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-49}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 2.2e-49) (* R (- lambda1)) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.2e-49) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 2.2d-49) then
        tmp = r * -lambda1
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.2e-49) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 2.2e-49:
		tmp = R * -lambda1
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 2.2e-49)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-lambda1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 2.2e-49)
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 2.2e-49], N[(R * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 2.1999999999999999e-49

   1. Initial program 60.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 14.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 14.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 14.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 14.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 12.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 12.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \lambda_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 12.4%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in 12.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right) \cdot R} \]

   10. Simplified 12.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right) \cdot R} \]

   if 2.1999999999999999e-49 < phi2

   1. Initial program 59.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 91.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 51.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   6. Simplified 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 24.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-49}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 15: 14.0% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \lambda_1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R lambda1))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * lambda1;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * lambda1
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * lambda1;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * lambda1

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * lambda1)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * lambda1;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * lambda1), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 15.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 15.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot R} \]

   2. associate-*l* 15.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot R\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 15.7%

      \[\leadsto \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot R\right) \]

6. Simplified 15.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot R\right)} \]

7. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 15.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]

8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 13.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \lambda_1} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 13.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R} \]

10. Simplified 13.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R} \]

11. Final simplification 13.6%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \lambda_1 \]

Alternative 16: 18.0% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \phi_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R phi2))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * phi2
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * phi2

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * phi2)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * phi2;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 95.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 18.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 18.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

6. Simplified 18.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

7. Final simplification 18.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023181 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))