Logistic function from Lakshay Garg

Percentage Accurate: 54.4% → 99.8%

Time: 3.6s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 35.6×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 54.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -400 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 0.0002\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.05396825396825397 \cdot {x}^{7} + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + \left(x + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* -2.0 x) -400.0) (not (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.0002)))
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (+
    (* -0.05396825396825397 (pow x 7.0))
    (+
     (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0))
     (+ x (* 0.13333333333333333 (pow x 5.0)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -400.0) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (-0.05396825396825397 * pow(x, 7.0)) + ((-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0)) + (x + (0.13333333333333333 * pow(x, 5.0))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-400.0d0)) .or. (.not. (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 0.0002d0))) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = ((-0.05396825396825397d0) * (x ** 7.0d0)) + (((-0.3333333333333333d0) * (x ** 3.0d0)) + (x + (0.13333333333333333d0 * (x ** 5.0d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -400.0) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (-0.05396825396825397 * Math.pow(x, 7.0)) + ((-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0)) + (x + (0.13333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 5.0))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -400.0) or not ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002):
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	else:
		tmp = (-0.05396825396825397 * math.pow(x, 7.0)) + ((-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0)) + (x + (0.13333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 5.0))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -400.0) || !(Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-0.05396825396825397 * (x ^ 7.0)) + Float64(Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)) + Float64(x + Float64(0.13333333333333333 * (x ^ 5.0)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -400.0) || ~(((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002)))
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	else
		tmp = (-0.05396825396825397 * (x ^ 7.0)) + ((-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)) + (x + (0.13333333333333333 * (x ^ 5.0))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -400.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.0002]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(-0.05396825396825397 * N[Power[x, 7.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(0.13333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 -2 x) < -400 or 2.0000000000000001e-4 < (*.f64 -2 x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]

   if -400 < (*.f64 -2 x) < 2.0000000000000001e-4

   1. Initial program 7.2%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.05396825396825397 \cdot {x}^{7} + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + \left(0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5} + x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -400 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 0.0002\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.05396825396825397 \cdot {x}^{7} + \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + \left(x + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -400 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 0.0002\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + \left(x + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* -2.0 x) -400.0) (not (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.0002)))
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (+
    (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0))
    (+ x (* 0.13333333333333333 (pow x 5.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -400.0) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0)) + (x + (0.13333333333333333 * pow(x, 5.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-400.0d0)) .or. (.not. (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 0.0002d0))) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = ((-0.3333333333333333d0) * (x ** 3.0d0)) + (x + (0.13333333333333333d0 * (x ** 5.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -400.0) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0)) + (x + (0.13333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 5.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -400.0) or not ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002):
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	else:
		tmp = (-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0)) + (x + (0.13333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 5.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -400.0) || !(Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)) + Float64(x + Float64(0.13333333333333333 * (x ^ 5.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -400.0) || ~(((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002)))
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	else
		tmp = (-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)) + (x + (0.13333333333333333 * (x ^ 5.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -400.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.0002]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(0.13333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 -2 x) < -400 or 2.0000000000000001e-4 < (*.f64 -2 x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]

   if -400 < (*.f64 -2 x) < 2.0000000000000001e-4

   1. Initial program 7.2%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + \left(0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5} + x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -400 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 0.0002\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + \left(x + 0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{5}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 100.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.005 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 0.0002\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* -2.0 x) -0.005) (not (<= (* -2.0 x) 0.0002)))
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (+ x (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -0.005) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-0.005d0)) .or. (.not. (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 0.0002d0))) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333d0) * (x ** 3.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -0.005) || !((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002)) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.005) or not ((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002):
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -0.005) || !(Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((-2.0 * x) <= -0.005) || ~(((-2.0 * x) <= 0.0002)))
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -0.005], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 0.0002]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 -2 x) < -0.0050000000000000001 or 2.0000000000000001e-4 < (*.f64 -2 x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]

   if -0.0050000000000000001 < (*.f64 -2 x) < 2.0000000000000001e-4

   1. Initial program 6.4%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.005 \lor \neg \left(-2 \cdot x \leq 0.0002\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 76.4% accurate, 35.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -1.0) -1.0 x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.0:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.0], -1.0, x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   4. Simplified 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -1 < x

   1. Initial program 44.5%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 61.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 28.2% accurate, 109.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 57.9%

   \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 26.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + -2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 26.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

4. Simplified 26.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot -2}} - 1 \]

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 26.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

6. Final simplification 26.2%

   \[\leadsto -1 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023178 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Logistic function from Lakshay Garg"
  :precision binary64
  (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))