Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 14.2s
Alternatives: 7
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 7 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
     -1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification99.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 97.6% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{1 - \frac{-1}{u}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     (/ (exp (/ (- PI) s)) u)
     (/ (+ -1.0 (/ (/ 1.0 u) u)) (- 1.0 (/ -1.0 u))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) / u) + ((-1.0f + ((1.0f / u) / u)) / (1.0f - (-1.0f / u)))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) / u) + Float32(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / u) / u)) / Float32(Float32(1.0) - Float32(Float32(-1.0) / u)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((exp((-single(pi) / s)) / u) + ((single(-1.0) + ((single(1.0) / u) / u)) / (single(1.0) - (single(-1.0) / u)))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{1 - \frac{-1}{u}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 85.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative85.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified85.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative96.7%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right) \cdot s} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-neg-in96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
    4. associate--l+96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    5. mul-1-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    6. distribute-frac-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    7. sub-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  9. Simplified96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} + -1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. flip-+96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{u} \cdot \frac{1}{u} - -1 \cdot -1}{\frac{1}{u} - -1}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    2. metadata-eval96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{\frac{1}{u} \cdot \frac{1}{u} - \color{blue}{1}}{\frac{1}{u} - -1}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  11. Applied egg-rr96.7%

    \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{u} \cdot \frac{1}{u} - 1}{\frac{1}{u} - -1}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  12. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{u} \cdot \frac{1}{u} + \left(-1\right)}}{\frac{1}{u} - -1}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    2. metadata-eval96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{\frac{1}{u} \cdot \frac{1}{u} + \color{blue}{-1}}{\frac{1}{u} - -1}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    3. +-commutative96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{\color{blue}{-1 + \frac{1}{u} \cdot \frac{1}{u}}}{\frac{1}{u} - -1}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    4. associate-*r/96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{u} \cdot 1}{u}}}{\frac{1}{u} - -1}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    5. *-rgt-identity96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{u}}}{u}}{\frac{1}{u} - -1}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    6. sub-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{u} + \left(--1\right)}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{\frac{1}{u} + \color{blue}{1}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    8. +-commutative96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{\color{blue}{1 + \frac{1}{u}}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    9. *-lft-identity96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{1 + \color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{1}{u}}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    10. metadata-eval96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(--1\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{u}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    11. cancel-sign-sub-inv96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{\color{blue}{1 - -1 \cdot \frac{1}{u}}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    12. *-commutative96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{1 - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{u} \cdot -1}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    13. associate-*l/96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{1 - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot -1}{u}}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    14. metadata-eval96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{1 - \frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{u}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  13. Simplified96.7%

    \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{1 - \frac{-1}{u}}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  14. Final simplification96.7%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{u}}{1 - \frac{-1}{u}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 97.6% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* (- s) (log (+ (/ (exp (/ (- PI) s)) u) (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 u))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) / u) + (-1.0f + (1.0f / u))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) / u) + Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / u)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((exp((-single(pi) / s)) / u) + (single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / u))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 85.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative85.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified85.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative96.7%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right) \cdot s} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-neg-in96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
    4. associate--l+96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    5. mul-1-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    6. distribute-frac-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    7. sub-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  9. Simplified96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} + -1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification96.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 76.3% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* (- s) (log (+ (/ (exp (/ (- PI) s)) u) (/ 1.0 u)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) / u) + (1.0f / u)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) / u) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / u))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((exp((-single(pi) / s)) / u) + (single(1.0) / u)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 85.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative85.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified85.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative96.7%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right) \cdot s} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-neg-in96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
    4. associate--l+96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    5. mul-1-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    6. distribute-frac-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    7. sub-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  9. Simplified96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} + -1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
  10. Taylor expanded in u around 0 73.5%

    \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{u}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  11. Final simplification73.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) \]

Alternative 5: 37.1% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{2}{u}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (- s) (log (+ -1.0 (/ 2.0 u)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (2.0f / u)));
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = -s * log(((-1.0e0) + (2.0e0 / u)))
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(2.0) / u))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(2.0) / u)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{2}{u}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 85.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative85.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified85.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative96.7%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right) \cdot s} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-neg-in96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \frac{1}{u}\right) - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
    4. associate--l+96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    5. mul-1-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    6. distribute-frac-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    7. sub-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval96.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  9. Simplified96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(\frac{1}{u} + -1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
  10. Taylor expanded in s around inf 36.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*36.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{u} - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-136.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{u} - 1\right) \]
    3. sub-neg36.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r/36.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{u}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval36.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval36.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{2}{u} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]
  12. Simplified36.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{2}{u} + -1\right)} \]
  13. Final simplification36.2%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{2}{u}\right) \]

Alternative 6: 16.1% accurate, 146.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* -2.0 (* s u)))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -2.0f * (s * u);
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = (-2.0e0) * (s * u)
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-2.0) * Float32(s * u))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-2.0) * (s * u);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 9.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 9.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 0.5\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative9.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 0.5\right)\right) \cdot -4}\right) \]
    2. associate-*l*9.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 0.5\right) \cdot -4\right)}\right) \]
    3. sub-neg9.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
    4. mul-1-neg9.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-0.5\right)\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-frac-neg9.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-0.5\right)\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval9.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
  7. Simplified9.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + -0.5\right) \cdot -4\right)}\right) \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around inf 16.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + -0.5\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg16.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right)} + -0.5\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
    2. unsub-neg16.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + -0.5\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
  10. Simplified16.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + -0.5\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
  11. Taylor expanded in s around 0 16.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)} \]
  12. Final simplification16.0%

    \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) \]

Alternative 7: 16.1% accurate, 146.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot -2\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (* u -2.0)))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (u * -2.0f);
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = s * (u * (-2.0e0))
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(u * Float32(-2.0)))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (u * single(-2.0));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot -2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 9.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 9.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 0.5\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative9.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 0.5\right)\right) \cdot -4}\right) \]
    2. associate-*l*9.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} - 0.5\right) \cdot -4\right)}\right) \]
    3. sub-neg9.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
    4. mul-1-neg9.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-0.5\right)\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-frac-neg9.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-0.5\right)\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval9.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
  7. Simplified9.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + -0.5\right) \cdot -4\right)}\right) \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around inf 16.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + -0.5\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg16.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right)} + -0.5\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
    2. unsub-neg16.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + -0.5\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
  10. Simplified16.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-u \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + -0.5\right) \cdot -4\right)\right) \]
  11. Taylor expanded in s around 0 16.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)} \]
  12. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative16.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot u\right) \cdot -2} \]
    2. associate-*l*16.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(u \cdot -2\right)} \]
  13. Simplified16.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(u \cdot -2\right)} \]
  14. Final simplification16.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot -2\right) \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023178 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))