NMSE Section 6.1 mentioned, A

?

Percentage Accurate: 73.3% → 99.8%
Time: 13.3s
Precision: binary64
Cost: 14024

?

\[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(1 + x\right) \cdot e^{-x}\\ t_1 := e^{\varepsilon \cdot \left(-x\right)}\\ \mathbf{if}\;\varepsilon \leq -14.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{\varepsilon \cdot x} + t_1}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\varepsilon \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t_0 + t_0}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + \varepsilon\right)} + t_1}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (-
   (* (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 eps)) (exp (- (* (- 1.0 eps) x))))
   (* (- (/ 1.0 eps) 1.0) (exp (- (* (+ 1.0 eps) x)))))
  2.0))
(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (+ 1.0 x) (exp (- x)))) (t_1 (exp (* eps (- x)))))
   (if (<= eps -14.5)
     (/ (+ (exp (* eps x)) t_1) 2.0)
     (if (<= eps 5e-41)
       (/ (+ t_0 t_0) 2.0)
       (/ (+ (exp (* x (+ -1.0 eps))) t_1) 2.0)))))
double code(double x, double eps) {
	return (((1.0 + (1.0 / eps)) * exp(-((1.0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * exp(-((1.0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0;
}
double code(double x, double eps) {
	double t_0 = (1.0 + x) * exp(-x);
	double t_1 = exp((eps * -x));
	double tmp;
	if (eps <= -14.5) {
		tmp = (exp((eps * x)) + t_1) / 2.0;
	} else if (eps <= 5e-41) {
		tmp = (t_0 + t_0) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (exp((x * (-1.0 + eps))) + t_1) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (((1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / eps)) * exp(-((1.0d0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0d0 / eps) - 1.0d0) * exp(-((1.0d0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0d0
end function
real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (1.0d0 + x) * exp(-x)
    t_1 = exp((eps * -x))
    if (eps <= (-14.5d0)) then
        tmp = (exp((eps * x)) + t_1) / 2.0d0
    else if (eps <= 5d-41) then
        tmp = (t_0 + t_0) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (exp((x * ((-1.0d0) + eps))) + t_1) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	return (((1.0 + (1.0 / eps)) * Math.exp(-((1.0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * Math.exp(-((1.0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0;
}
public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	double t_0 = (1.0 + x) * Math.exp(-x);
	double t_1 = Math.exp((eps * -x));
	double tmp;
	if (eps <= -14.5) {
		tmp = (Math.exp((eps * x)) + t_1) / 2.0;
	} else if (eps <= 5e-41) {
		tmp = (t_0 + t_0) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (Math.exp((x * (-1.0 + eps))) + t_1) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, eps):
	return (((1.0 + (1.0 / eps)) * math.exp(-((1.0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * math.exp(-((1.0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0
def code(x, eps):
	t_0 = (1.0 + x) * math.exp(-x)
	t_1 = math.exp((eps * -x))
	tmp = 0
	if eps <= -14.5:
		tmp = (math.exp((eps * x)) + t_1) / 2.0
	elif eps <= 5e-41:
		tmp = (t_0 + t_0) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (math.exp((x * (-1.0 + eps))) + t_1) / 2.0
	return tmp
function code(x, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / eps)) * exp(Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 - eps) * x)))) - Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * exp(Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 + eps) * x))))) / 2.0)
end
function code(x, eps)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(1.0 + x) * exp(Float64(-x)))
	t_1 = exp(Float64(eps * Float64(-x)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (eps <= -14.5)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(eps * x)) + t_1) / 2.0);
	elseif (eps <= 5e-41)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 + t_0) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(x * Float64(-1.0 + eps))) + t_1) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp = code(x, eps)
	tmp = (((1.0 + (1.0 / eps)) * exp(-((1.0 - eps) * x))) - (((1.0 / eps) - 1.0) * exp(-((1.0 + eps) * x)))) / 2.0;
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, eps)
	t_0 = (1.0 + x) * exp(-x);
	t_1 = exp((eps * -x));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (eps <= -14.5)
		tmp = (exp((eps * x)) + t_1) / 2.0;
	elseif (eps <= 5e-41)
		tmp = (t_0 + t_0) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (exp((x * (-1.0 + eps))) + t_1) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, eps_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / eps), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[(-N[(N[(1.0 - eps), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(1.0 / eps), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[(-N[(N[(1.0 + eps), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, eps_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[(-x)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[Exp[N[(eps * (-x)), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[eps, -14.5], N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(eps * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[eps, 5e-41], N[(N[(t$95$0 + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(x * N[(-1.0 + eps), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]]]
\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2}
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \left(1 + x\right) \cdot e^{-x}\\
t_1 := e^{\varepsilon \cdot \left(-x\right)}\\
\mathbf{if}\;\varepsilon \leq -14.5:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{e^{\varepsilon \cdot x} + t_1}{2}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;\varepsilon \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{t_0 + t_0}{2}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + \varepsilon\right)} + t_1}{2}\\


\end{array}

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Herbie found 15 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup

Accuracy vs Speed

The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Bogosity?

Bogosity

Try it out?

Your Program's Arguments

Results

Enter valid numbers for all inputs

Derivation?

  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if eps < -14.5

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} + -1\right) \cdot e^{\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}{2}} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]100.0%

      \[ \frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]

      div-sub [=>]100.0%

      \[ \color{blue}{\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} - \frac{\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2}} \]

      +-rgt-identity [<=]100.0%

      \[ \frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} + 0}}{2} - \frac{\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]

      div-sub [<=]100.0%

      \[ \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} + 0\right) - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right)} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \left(\left(\varepsilon + 1\right) \cdot x\right)}}}{2} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right)} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right)}}}{2} \]
    5. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right)} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}}{2} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]100.0%

      \[ \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right)} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right)}}{2} \]

      *-commutative [=>]100.0%

      \[ \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right)} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}}{2} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right)\right)}} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}{2} \]
    7. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right)}} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}{2} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]100.0%

      \[ \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right)\right)} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}{2} \]

      associate-*r* [=>]100.0%

      \[ \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-1 \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right)}} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}{2} \]

      neg-mul-1 [<=]100.0%

      \[ \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\varepsilon\right)} \cdot x\right)} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}{2} \]

    if -14.5 < eps < 4.9999999999999996e-41

    1. Initial program 43.7%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified43.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} + -1\right) \cdot e^{\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}{2}} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]43.7%

      \[ \frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]

      div-sub [=>]43.7%

      \[ \color{blue}{\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} - \frac{\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2}} \]

      +-rgt-identity [<=]43.7%

      \[ \frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} + 0}}{2} - \frac{\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]

      div-sub [<=]43.7%

      \[ \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} + 0\right) - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(e^{-1 \cdot x} \cdot x + e^{-1 \cdot x}\right) - \left(-1 \cdot \left(e^{-1 \cdot x} \cdot x\right) + -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot x}\right)}}{2} \]
    4. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot e^{-x} - \left(-\left(x + 1\right) \cdot e^{-x}\right)}}{2} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]98.1%

      \[ \frac{\left(e^{-1 \cdot x} \cdot x + e^{-1 \cdot x}\right) - \left(-1 \cdot \left(e^{-1 \cdot x} \cdot x\right) + -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot x}\right)}{2} \]

      *-commutative [=>]98.1%

      \[ \frac{\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot e^{-1 \cdot x}} + e^{-1 \cdot x}\right) - \left(-1 \cdot \left(e^{-1 \cdot x} \cdot x\right) + -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot x}\right)}{2} \]

      distribute-lft1-in [=>]98.1%

      \[ \frac{\color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot e^{-1 \cdot x}} - \left(-1 \cdot \left(e^{-1 \cdot x} \cdot x\right) + -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot x}\right)}{2} \]

      mul-1-neg [=>]98.1%

      \[ \frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot e^{\color{blue}{-x}} - \left(-1 \cdot \left(e^{-1 \cdot x} \cdot x\right) + -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot x}\right)}{2} \]

      distribute-lft-out [=>]98.1%

      \[ \frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot e^{-x} - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(e^{-1 \cdot x} \cdot x + e^{-1 \cdot x}\right)}}{2} \]

      mul-1-neg [=>]98.1%

      \[ \frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot e^{-x} - \color{blue}{\left(-\left(e^{-1 \cdot x} \cdot x + e^{-1 \cdot x}\right)\right)}}{2} \]

      *-commutative [=>]98.1%

      \[ \frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot e^{-x} - \left(-\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot e^{-1 \cdot x}} + e^{-1 \cdot x}\right)\right)}{2} \]

      distribute-lft1-in [=>]100.0%

      \[ \frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot e^{-x} - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot e^{-1 \cdot x}}\right)}{2} \]

      mul-1-neg [=>]100.0%

      \[ \frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot e^{-x} - \left(-\left(x + 1\right) \cdot e^{\color{blue}{-x}}\right)}{2} \]

    if 4.9999999999999996e-41 < eps

    1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]
    2. Simplified97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} + -1\right) \cdot e^{\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}}{2}} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]97.2%

      \[ \frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]

      div-sub [=>]97.2%

      \[ \color{blue}{\frac{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} - \frac{\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2}} \]

      +-rgt-identity [<=]97.2%

      \[ \frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} + 0}}{2} - \frac{\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2} \]

      div-sub [<=]97.2%

      \[ \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\left(1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x} + 0\right) - \left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot e^{-\left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot x}}{2}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right)} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \left(\left(\varepsilon + 1\right) \cdot x\right)}}}{2} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right)} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right)}}}{2} \]
    5. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right)} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}}{2} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]100.0%

      \[ \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right)} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right)}}{2} \]

      *-commutative [=>]100.0%

      \[ \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right)} - -1 \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}}{2} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification100.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\varepsilon \leq -14.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{\varepsilon \cdot x} + e^{\varepsilon \cdot \left(-x\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\varepsilon \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\left(1 + x\right) \cdot e^{-x} + \left(1 + x\right) \cdot e^{-x}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + \varepsilon\right)} + e^{\varepsilon \cdot \left(-x\right)}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy99.8%
Cost14024
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(1 + x\right) \cdot e^{-x}\\ t_1 := e^{\varepsilon \cdot \left(-x\right)}\\ \mathbf{if}\;\varepsilon \leq -14.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{\varepsilon \cdot x} + t_1}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\varepsilon \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t_0 + t_0}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + \varepsilon\right)} + t_1}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 2
Accuracy99.9%
Cost14025
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(1 + x\right) \cdot e^{-x}\\ \mathbf{if}\;\varepsilon \leq -14.5 \lor \neg \left(\varepsilon \leq 0.00033\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{\varepsilon \cdot x} + e^{\varepsilon \cdot \left(-x\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t_0 + t_0}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 3
Accuracy82.7%
Cost13705
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\varepsilon \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+221} \lor \neg \left(\varepsilon \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + e^{x \cdot \left(1 + \varepsilon\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 - \varepsilon\right)} + e^{-x}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 4
Accuracy98.2%
Cost13705
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\varepsilon \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+119} \lor \neg \left(\varepsilon \leq 0.00033\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{\varepsilon \cdot x} + e^{\varepsilon \cdot \left(-x\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 - \varepsilon\right)} + e^{-x}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 5
Accuracy98.9%
Cost13632
\[\frac{e^{x \cdot \left(-1 + \varepsilon\right)} + e^{x \cdot \left(-1 - \varepsilon\right)}}{2} \]
Alternative 6
Accuracy80.6%
Cost7240
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + e^{-x}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+19}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + e^{x \cdot \left(1 + \varepsilon\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\varepsilon} + \left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 7
Accuracy80.8%
Cost7176
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + e^{-x}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 720:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + e^{\varepsilon \cdot \left(-x\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\varepsilon} + \left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 8
Accuracy74.4%
Cost6916
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 460:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + e^{-x}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\varepsilon} + \left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 9
Accuracy64.2%
Cost1480
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\varepsilon} + \left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.3 \cdot 10^{+207}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{x}{\varepsilon} + -0.5 \cdot \frac{x \cdot x}{\varepsilon}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 400:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + t_0}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t_0}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 10
Accuracy63.6%
Cost1352
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+183}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{x}{\varepsilon} + -0.5 \cdot \frac{x \cdot x}{\varepsilon}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 430:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\varepsilon} + \left(1 + \varepsilon\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 11
Accuracy61.0%
Cost964
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\left(\left(1 - \varepsilon\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{-1}{\varepsilon}\right)}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 500:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{0}{\varepsilon}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 12
Accuracy60.3%
Cost964
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+183}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{x}{\varepsilon} + -0.5 \cdot \frac{x \cdot x}{\varepsilon}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 500:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{0}{\varepsilon}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 13
Accuracy49.7%
Cost585
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+183} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 320\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\varepsilon \cdot x}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 14
Accuracy59.7%
Cost584
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+183}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\varepsilon \cdot x}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 550:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{0}{\varepsilon}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 15
Accuracy44.2%
Cost64
\[1 \]

Reproduce?

herbie shell --seed 2023178 
(FPCore (x eps)
  :name "NMSE Section 6.1 mentioned, A"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (- (* (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 eps)) (exp (- (* (- 1.0 eps) x)))) (* (- (/ 1.0 eps) 1.0) (exp (- (* (+ 1.0 eps) x))))) 2.0))