Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 4.4s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3 \cdot y, -z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x (* 3.0 y) (- z)))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, (3.0 * y), -z);
}

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, Float64(3.0 * y), Float64(-z))
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[(3.0 * y), $MachinePrecision] + (-z)), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   2. fma-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3 \cdot y, -z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3 \cdot y, -z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3 \cdot y, -z\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ 3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* 3.0 (* x y)) z))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (3.0d0 * (x * y)) - z
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y, z):
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(3.0 * Float64(x * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(3.0 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(y \cdot x\right)} - z \]

3. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right) - z \]

Alternative 3: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (* 3.0 y)) z))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (3.0d0 * y)) - z
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(3.0 * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(3.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   2. fma-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3 \cdot y, -z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3 \cdot y, -z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]

6. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z \]

Alternative 4: 51.3% accurate, 3.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ -z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y, z):
	return -z

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-z)
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := (-z)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 52.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 52.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

4. Simplified 52.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

5. Final simplification 52.8%

   \[\leadsto -z \]

Alternative 5: 2.3% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} - z \]

   2. associate-*r* 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot \sqrt{y}\right) \cdot \sqrt{y}} - z \]

   3. fma-neg 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot \sqrt{y}, \sqrt{y}, -z\right)} \]

   4. add-sqr-sqrt 22.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot \sqrt{y}, \sqrt{y}, \color{blue}{\sqrt{-z} \cdot \sqrt{-z}}\right) \]

   5. sqrt-unprod 31.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot \sqrt{y}, \sqrt{y}, \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}}\right) \]

   6. sqr-neg 31.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot \sqrt{y}, \sqrt{y}, \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot z}}\right) \]

   7. sqrt-unprod 14.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot \sqrt{y}, \sqrt{y}, \color{blue}{\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}}\right) \]

   8. add-sqr-sqrt 25.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot \sqrt{y}, \sqrt{y}, \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

3. Applied egg-rr 25.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot \sqrt{y}, \sqrt{y}, z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 2.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

5. Final simplification 2.5%

   \[\leadsto z \]

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (* 3.0 y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (3.0d0 * y)) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(3.0 * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(3.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023176 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (* x (* 3.0 y)) z)

  (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))