symmetry log of sum of exp

Percentage Accurate: 54.2% → 99.0%

Time: 15.6s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 2.9×

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = 1.2862368951532726e+209
  2. b = 1.9543453286039857e-101

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (log (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return log((exp(a) + exp(b)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = log((exp(a) + exp(b)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.log((Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b)));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.log((math.exp(a) + math.exp(b)))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return log(Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = log((exp(a) + exp(b)));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[Log[N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 54.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (log (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return log((exp(a) + exp(b)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = log((exp(a) + exp(b)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.log((Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b)));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.log((math.exp(a) + math.exp(b)))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return log(Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = log((exp(a) + exp(b)));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[Log[N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 2e-101) (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0)) (log (+ (exp a) (exp b)))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 2e-101) {
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = log((exp(a) + exp(b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 2d-101) then
        tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = log((exp(a) + exp(b)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 2e-101) {
		tmp = b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 2e-101:
		tmp = b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.log((math.exp(a) + math.exp(b)))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 2e-101)
		tmp = Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 2e-101)
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = log((exp(a) + exp(b)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 2e-101], N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 2.0000000000000001e-101

   1. Initial program 9.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   4. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   if 2.0000000000000001e-101 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 70.7%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0.0001:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(e^{b} + \left(a + 1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.0001) (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0)) (log (+ (exp b) (+ a 1.0)))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0001) {
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = log((exp(b) + (a + 1.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 0.0001d0) then
        tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = log((exp(b) + (a + 1.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.0001) {
		tmp = b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((Math.exp(b) + (a + 1.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.0001:
		tmp = b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.log((math.exp(b) + (a + 1.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0001)
		tmp = Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(exp(b) + Float64(a + 1.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0001)
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = log((exp(b) + (a + 1.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.0001], N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 1.00000000000000005e-4

   1. Initial program 9.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   4. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   if 1.00000000000000005e-4 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 70.7%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 70.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(a + e^{b}\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 70.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + a\right) + e^{b}\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 70.0%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{b} + \left(1 + a\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 70.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{b} + \left(1 + a\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0.0001:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(e^{b} + \left(a + 1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{e^{a} + 1} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (+ (log1p (exp a)) (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	return log1p(exp(a)) + (b / (exp(a) + 1.0));
}

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.log1p(Math.exp(a)) + (b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0));
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	return math.log1p(math.exp(a)) + (b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0))

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	return Float64(log1p(exp(a)) + Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0)))
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Log[1 + N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 55.1%

   \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 75.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-def 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

4. Simplified 75.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

5. Final simplification 75.7%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{e^{a} + 1} \]

Alternative 4: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 2e-101) (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0)) (log1p (exp b))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 2e-101) {
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = log1p(exp(b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 2e-101) {
		tmp = b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log1p(Math.exp(b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 2e-101:
		tmp = b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.log1p(math.exp(b))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 2e-101)
		tmp = Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = log1p(exp(b));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 2e-101], N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[1 + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 2.0000000000000001e-101

   1. Initial program 9.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   4. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   if 2.0000000000000001e-101 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 70.7%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around 0 69.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{b}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 69.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 98.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a} + \mathsf{expm1}\left(b\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (log1p (+ (exp a) (expm1 b))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	return log1p((exp(a) + expm1(b)));
}

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.log1p((Math.exp(a) + Math.expm1(b)));
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	return math.log1p((math.exp(a) + math.expm1(b)))

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	return log1p(Float64(exp(a) + expm1(b)))
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := N[Log[1 + N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[(Exp[b] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 55.1%

   \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 53.9%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{e^{a} + e^{b}} \cdot \sqrt{e^{a} + e^{b}}\right)} \]

   2. log-prod 54.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\sqrt{e^{a} + e^{b}}\right) + \log \left(\sqrt{e^{a} + e^{b}}\right)} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 54.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\sqrt{e^{a} + e^{b}}\right) + \log \left(\sqrt{e^{a} + e^{b}}\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log-prod 53.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\sqrt{e^{a} + e^{b}} \cdot \sqrt{e^{a} + e^{b}}\right)} \]

   2. rem-square-sqrt 55.1%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} \]

   3. log1p-expm1 54.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. expm1-def 54.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} - 1}\right) \]

   5. rem-exp-log 54.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} - 1\right) \]

   6. associate--l+ 54.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{a} + \left(e^{b} - 1\right)}\right) \]

   7. expm1-def 77.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a} + \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b\right)}\right) \]

5. Simplified 77.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a} + \mathsf{expm1}\left(b\right)\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 77.4%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a} + \mathsf{expm1}\left(b\right)\right) \]

Alternative 6: 97.4% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0.0001:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(b + \left(a + 2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.0001) (/ b (+ (exp a) 1.0)) (log (+ b (+ a 2.0)))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0001) {
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = log((b + (a + 2.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 0.0001d0) then
        tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = log((b + (a + 2.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.0001) {
		tmp = b / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((b + (a + 2.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.0001:
		tmp = b / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.log((b + (a + 2.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0001)
		tmp = Float64(b / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(b + Float64(a + 2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0001)
		tmp = b / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = log((b + (a + 2.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.0001], N[(b / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(b + N[(a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 1.00000000000000005e-4

   1. Initial program 9.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   4. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   if 1.00000000000000005e-4 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 70.7%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(e^{a} + b\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + e^{a}\right) + b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + 1\right)} + b\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 66.3%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(a + b\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 66.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + b\right) + 2\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 66.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + a\right)} + 2\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 66.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(a + 2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 66.3%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(a + 2\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0.0001:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(b + \left(a + 2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 57.3% accurate, 2.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(b + \left(a + 2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -1.0) (* b 0.5) (log (+ b (+ a 2.0)))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.0) {
		tmp = b * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = log((b + (a + 2.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = b * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = log((b + (a + 2.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.0) {
		tmp = b * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((b + (a + 2.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -1.0:
		tmp = b * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = math.log((b + (a + 2.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.0)
		tmp = Float64(b * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(b + Float64(a + 2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -1.0)
		tmp = b * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = log((b + (a + 2.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -1.0], N[(b * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(b + N[(a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1

   1. Initial program 9.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   4. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 4.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot b + \log 2} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 18.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot b} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 18.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot 0.5} \]

   8. Simplified 18.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot 0.5} \]

   if -1 < a

   1. Initial program 70.7%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(e^{a} + b\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + e^{a}\right) + b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + 1\right)} + b\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 66.3%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(a + b\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 66.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + b\right) + 2\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 66.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + a\right)} + 2\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 66.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(a + 2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 66.3%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(a + 2\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(b + \left(a + 2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 56.8% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(a + 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (if (<= a -1.0) (* b 0.5) (log (+ a 2.0))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.0) {
		tmp = b * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = log((a + 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = b * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = log((a + 2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.0) {
		tmp = b * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((a + 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -1.0:
		tmp = b * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = math.log((a + 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.0)
		tmp = Float64(b * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(a + 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -1.0)
		tmp = b * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = log((a + 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -1.0], N[(b * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1

   1. Initial program 9.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   4. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 4.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot b + \log 2} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 18.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot b} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 18.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot 0.5} \]

   8. Simplified 18.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot 0.5} \]

   if -1 < a

   1. Initial program 70.7%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(2 + a\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 67.1%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(a + 2\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(a + 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(a + 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 56.7% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -95:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(b + 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (if (<= a -95.0) (* b 0.5) (log (+ b 2.0))))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -95.0) {
		tmp = b * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = log((b + 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-95.0d0)) then
        tmp = b * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = log((b + 2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -95.0) {
		tmp = b * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((b + 2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -95.0:
		tmp = b * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = math.log((b + 2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -95.0)
		tmp = Float64(b * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = log(Float64(b + 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -95.0)
		tmp = b * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = log((b + 2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -95.0], N[(b * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -95

   1. Initial program 9.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   4. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 4.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot b + \log 2} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 18.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot b} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 18.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot 0.5} \]

   8. Simplified 18.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot 0.5} \]

   if -95 < a

   1. Initial program 70.7%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(e^{a} + b\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + e^{a}\right) + b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + 1\right)} + b\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 66.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + \left(1 + b\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 65.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(2 + b\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 65.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(b + 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 65.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(b + 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -95:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(b + 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 56.2% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -175:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (if (<= a -175.0) (* b 0.5) (log 2.0)))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -175.0) {
		tmp = b * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = log(2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-175.0d0)) then
        tmp = b * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = log(2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -175.0) {
		tmp = b * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -175.0:
		tmp = b * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = math.log(2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -175.0)
		tmp = Float64(b * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = log(2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -175.0)
		tmp = b * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = log(2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -175.0], N[(b * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -175

   1. Initial program 9.3%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

   4. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 4.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot b + \log 2} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 18.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot b} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 18.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot 0.5} \]

   8. Simplified 18.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot 0.5} \]

   if -175 < a

   1. Initial program 70.7%

      \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 67.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 66.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -175:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 12.0% accurate, 101.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b])\\ \\ b \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (* b 0.5))

C

assert(a < b);
double code(double a, double b) {
	return b * 0.5;
}

Fortran

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = b * 0.5d0
end function

Java

assert a < b;
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return b * 0.5;
}

Python

[a, b] = sort([a, b])
def code(a, b):
	return b * 0.5

Julia

a, b = sort([a, b])
function code(a, b)
	return Float64(b * 0.5)
end

MATLAB

a, b = num2cell(sort([a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = b * 0.5;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: a and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_] := N[(b * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 55.1%

   \[\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 75.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-def 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right)} + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}} \]

4. Simplified 75.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{a}\right) + \frac{b}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 50.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot b + \log 2} \]

6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 7.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot b} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 7.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot 0.5} \]

8. Simplified 7.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot 0.5} \]

9. Final simplification 7.7%

   \[\leadsto b \cdot 0.5 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023175 
(FPCore (a b)
  :name "symmetry log of sum of exp"
  :precision binary64
  (log (+ (exp a) (exp b))))