SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.3% → 97.8%

Time: 11.3s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma z (* y (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(z, (y * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(z, Float64(y * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * N[(y * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.6%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

   3. associate-*l* 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   4. fma-def 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \]

Alternative 2: 96.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.6%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 97.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 97.1%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 89.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-83} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-53}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -4.8e-83) (not (<= t 7.6e-53)))
   (fma z (* y (tanh (/ t y))) x)
   (+ x (* z (- t (* y (tanh (/ x y))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -4.8e-83) || !(t <= 7.6e-53)) {
		tmp = fma(z, (y * tanh((t / y))), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - (y * tanh((x / y)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -4.8e-83) || !(t <= 7.6e-53))
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(y * tanh(Float64(t / y))), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - Float64(y * tanh(Float64(x / y))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -4.8e-83], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 7.6e-53]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - N[(y * N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -4.8000000000000002e-83 or 7.5999999999999995e-53 < t

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 14.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)}, x\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 14.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right), x\right) \]

      2. div-sub 14.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}, x\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 14.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 14.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   6. Simplified 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   if -4.8000000000000002e-83 < t < 7.5999999999999995e-53

   1. Initial program 88.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 95.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around -inf 34.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right) + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 34.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 34.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 34.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. associate-*r* 33.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 33.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z - \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 85.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 34.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t - y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 34.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 34.1%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(t - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

   10. Simplified 92.4%

       \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-83} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{-53}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 88.6% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-83} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-45}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -1.05e-83) (not (<= t 3.2e-45)))
   (+ x (* y (* z (tanh (/ t y)))))
   (+ x (* z (- t (* y (tanh (/ x y))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -1.05e-83) || !(t <= 3.2e-45)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - (y * tanh((x / y)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-1.05d-83)) .or. (.not. (t <= 3.2d-45))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - (y * tanh((x / y)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -1.05e-83) || !(t <= 3.2e-45)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * Math.tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - (y * Math.tanh((x / y)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -1.05e-83) or not (t <= 3.2e-45):
		tmp = x + (y * (z * math.tanh((t / y))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - (y * math.tanh((x / y)))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -1.05e-83) || !(t <= 3.2e-45))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * tanh(Float64(t / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - Float64(y * tanh(Float64(x / y))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -1.05e-83) || ~((t <= 3.2e-45)))
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - (y * tanh((x / y)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -1.05e-83], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 3.2e-45]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - N[(y * N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1.0499999999999999e-83 or 3.20000000000000007e-45 < t

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 14.4%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 14.4%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      2. div-sub 14.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 14.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 14.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 91.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 91.3%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.0499999999999999e-83 < t < 3.20000000000000007e-45

   1. Initial program 88.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 95.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around -inf 34.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right) + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 34.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 34.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 34.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. associate-*r* 33.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 33.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z - \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 85.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 34.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t - y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) \cdot z} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 34.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 34.1%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(t - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

   10. Simplified 92.4%

       \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-83} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-45}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 82.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-90} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-179}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + z \cdot t\right) - z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -4.5e-90) (not (<= t 2.55e-179)))
   (+ x (* y (* z (tanh (/ t y)))))
   (- (+ x (* z t)) (* z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -4.5e-90) || !(t <= 2.55e-179)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + (z * t)) - (z * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-4.5d-90)) .or. (.not. (t <= 2.55d-179))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))))
    else
        tmp = (x + (z * t)) - (z * x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -4.5e-90) || !(t <= 2.55e-179)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * Math.tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + (z * t)) - (z * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -4.5e-90) or not (t <= 2.55e-179):
		tmp = x + (y * (z * math.tanh((t / y))))
	else:
		tmp = (x + (z * t)) - (z * x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -4.5e-90) || !(t <= 2.55e-179))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * tanh(Float64(t / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(z * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -4.5e-90) || ~((t <= 2.55e-179)))
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	else
		tmp = (x + (z * t)) - (z * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -4.5e-90], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 2.55e-179]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -4.50000000000000009e-90 or 2.55000000000000014e-179 < t

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 21.1%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 21.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      2. div-sub 21.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 21.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 21.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 89.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 89.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if -4.50000000000000009e-90 < t < 2.55000000000000014e-179

   1. Initial program 86.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 93.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 91.4%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around -inf 31.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right) + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 31.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 31.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 31.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. associate-*r* 31.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 31.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z - \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 86.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x\right) - z \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-90} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-179}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + z \cdot t\right) - z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 70.0% accurate, 19.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{-61}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+277}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* z t))))
   (if (<= y -3.2e-26)
     t_1
     (if (<= y 1.6e-61) x (if (<= y 3.8e+277) t_1 (- x (* z x)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.2e-26) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 1.6e-61) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.8e+277) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (z * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x + (z * t)
    if (y <= (-3.2d-26)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (y <= 1.6d-61) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 3.8d+277) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x - (z * x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.2e-26) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 1.6e-61) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.8e+277) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (z * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.2e-26:
		tmp = t_1
	elif y <= 1.6e-61:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 3.8e+277:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x - (z * x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.2e-26)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 1.6e-61)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.8e+277)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(z * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.2e-26)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 1.6e-61)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.8e+277)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x - (z * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -3.2e-26], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 1.6e-61], x, If[LessEqual[y, 3.8e+277], t$95$1, N[(x - N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -3.2000000000000001e-26 or 1.6000000000000001e-61 < y < 3.80000000000000005e277

   1. Initial program 88.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} + x \]

   if -3.2000000000000001e-26 < y < 1.6000000000000001e-61

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 3.80000000000000005e277 < y

   1. Initial program 87.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right) + x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot x\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - z \cdot x} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - z \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{-61}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+277}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 77.1% accurate, 19.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{-40} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-61}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -7.5e-40) (not (<= y 2.15e-61))) (+ x (* z (- t x))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -7.5e-40) || !(y <= 2.15e-61)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-7.5d-40)) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.15d-61))) then
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -7.5e-40) || !(y <= 2.15e-61)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -7.5e-40) or not (y <= 2.15e-61):
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -7.5e-40) || !(y <= 2.15e-61))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -7.5e-40) || ~((y <= 2.15e-61)))
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -7.5e-40], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.15e-61]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -7.50000000000000069e-40 or 2.1500000000000002e-61 < y

   1. Initial program 88.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 88.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   if -7.50000000000000069e-40 < y < 2.1500000000000002e-61

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{-40} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-61}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 76.8% accurate, 19.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + z \cdot t\right) - z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-61}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -6.8e-38)
   (- (+ x (* z t)) (* z x))
   (if (<= y 1.1e-61) x (+ x (* z (- t x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.8e-38) {
		tmp = (x + (z * t)) - (z * x);
	} else if (y <= 1.1e-61) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-6.8d-38)) then
        tmp = (x + (z * t)) - (z * x)
    else if (y <= 1.1d-61) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.8e-38) {
		tmp = (x + (z * t)) - (z * x);
	} else if (y <= 1.1e-61) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -6.8e-38:
		tmp = (x + (z * t)) - (z * x)
	elif y <= 1.1e-61:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -6.8e-38)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(z * x));
	elseif (y <= 1.1e-61)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -6.8e-38)
		tmp = (x + (z * t)) - (z * x);
	elseif (y <= 1.1e-61)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, -6.8e-38], N[(N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.1e-61], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -6.8000000000000004e-38

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 93.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 76.5%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around -inf 49.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right) + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 49.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 49.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 49.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. associate-*r* 41.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 41.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(t \cdot z - \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 67.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x\right) - z \cdot x} \]

   if -6.8000000000000004e-38 < y < 1.10000000000000004e-61

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.10000000000000004e-61 < y

   1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 80.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + z \cdot t\right) - z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-61}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 64.1% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.2e+74) (not (<= z 8.2e+27))) (* z (- t x)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.2e+74) || !(z <= 8.2e+27)) {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.2d+74)) .or. (.not. (z <= 8.2d+27))) then
        tmp = z * (t - x)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.2e+74) || !(z <= 8.2e+27)) {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.2e+74) or not (z <= 8.2e+27):
		tmp = z * (t - x)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.2e+74) || !(z <= 8.2e+27))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t - x));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.2e+74) || ~((z <= 8.2e+27)))
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.2e+74], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 8.2e+27]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.20000000000000004e74 or 8.2000000000000005e27 < z

   1. Initial program 82.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 82.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 82.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 56.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 56.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -1.20000000000000004e74 < z < 8.2000000000000005e27

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 97.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+27}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 70.3% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-27} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-62}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.2e-27) (not (<= y 7e-62))) (+ x (* z t)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.2e-27) || !(y <= 7e-62)) {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.2d-27)) .or. (.not. (y <= 7d-62))) then
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.2e-27) || !(y <= 7e-62)) {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.2e-27) or not (y <= 7e-62):
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.2e-27) || !(y <= 7e-62))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.2e-27) || ~((y <= 7e-62)))
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.2e-27], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 7e-62]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.19999999999999987e-27 or 7.0000000000000003e-62 < y

   1. Initial program 88.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 67.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} + x \]

   if -2.19999999999999987e-27 < y < 7.0000000000000003e-62

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-27} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-62}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 59.9% accurate, 26.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+277}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.3e+192) x (if (<= y 3.2e+277) (* z t) (* z (- x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.3e+192) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.2e+277) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.3d+192) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 3.2d+277) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = z * -x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.3e+192) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.2e+277) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.3e+192:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 3.2e+277:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = z * -x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.3e+192)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.2e+277)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.3e+192)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.2e+277)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = z * -x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.3e+192], x, If[LessEqual[y, 3.2e+277], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * (-x)), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 2.2999999999999999e192

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 61.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.2999999999999999e192 < y < 3.2000000000000002e277

   1. Initial program 90.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 95.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if 3.2000000000000002e277 < y

   1. Initial program 87.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z \cdot x} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+277}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 60.3% accurate, 42.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{+191}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 9.8e+191) x (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.8e+191) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 9.8d+191) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.8e+191) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 9.8e+191:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 9.8e+191)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 9.8e+191)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 9.8e+191], x, N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 9.7999999999999999e191

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 61.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 9.7999999999999999e191 < y

   1. Initial program 89.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{+191}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 13: 60.1% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.6%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 97.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 57.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 57.7%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 96.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023174 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))