Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 1.3s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 1.0×

• 24.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- x (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x - (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x - (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x - (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x - (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x - Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x - (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- x (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x - (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x - (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x - (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x - (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x - Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x - (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- x (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x - (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x - (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x - (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x - (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x - Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x - (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x - y \cdot y \]

2. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x - y \cdot y \]

Alternative 2: 86.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+23} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1e+23) (not (<= y 5.4e+55))) (* y (- y)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1e+23) || !(y <= 5.4e+55)) {
		tmp = y * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1d+23)) .or. (.not. (y <= 5.4d+55))) then
        tmp = y * -y
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1e+23) || !(y <= 5.4e+55)) {
		tmp = y * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1e+23) or not (y <= 5.4e+55):
		tmp = y * -y
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1e+23) || !(y <= 5.4e+55))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1e+23) || ~((y <= 5.4e+55)))
		tmp = y * -y;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1e+23], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 5.4e+55]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -9.9999999999999992e22 or 5.39999999999999954e55 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x - y \cdot y \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot {y}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 95.1%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot y} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   if -9.9999999999999992e22 < y < 5.39999999999999954e55

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x - y \cdot y \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+23} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 51.8% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x - y \cdot y \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

3. Final simplification 50.4%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023173 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64
  (- x (* y y)))