Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 69.3% → 99.4%

Time: 8.7s

Precision: binary64

Cost: 27716

Math

\[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

↓

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+297}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

↓

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      1e+297)
   (fma
    y
    (/
     (fma z (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) 0.279195317918525)
     (fma z (+ z 6.012459259764103) 3.350343815022304))
    x)
   (+ x (/ y 14.431876219268936))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

↓

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+297) {
		tmp = fma(y, (fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, (z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

↓

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+297)
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 14.431876219268936));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

↓

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+297], N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / 14.431876219268936), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Target

Original	69.3%
Target	99.5%
Herbie	99.4%

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z < -8120153.652456675:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 6.576118972787377 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000)) < 1e297

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   2. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start] 98.6%	\[ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
      +-commutative [=>] 98.6%	\[ \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]
      associate-*r/ [<=] 99.8%	\[ \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]
      fma-def [=>] 99.8%	\[ \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]
      *-commutative [=>] 99.8%	\[ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      fma-def [=>] 99.8%	\[ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      fma-def [=>] 99.8%	\[ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      *-commutative [=>] 99.8%	\[ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      fma-def [=>] 99.8%	\[ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   if 1e297 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000))

   1. Initial program 0.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   2. Simplified 10.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start] 0.6%	\[ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
      associate-/l* [=>] 10.2%	\[ x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]
      fma-def [=>] 10.2%	\[ x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]
      fma-def [=>] 10.2%	\[ x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]
      fma-def [=>] 10.2%	\[ x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+297}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy	99.4%
Cost	27716

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+297}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2
Accuracy	98.3%
Cost	21444

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+297}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3
Accuracy	99.2%
Cost	21444

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+297}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4
Accuracy	96.4%
Cost	2628

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 10^{+297}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5
Accuracy	98.5%
Cost	1096

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{z \cdot 0.39999999996247915 + 12.000000000000014}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 + \frac{\frac{101.23733352003822}{z} - 15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6
Accuracy	98.4%
Cost	840

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7
Accuracy	98.4%
Cost	840

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{z \cdot 0.39999999996247915 + 12.000000000000014}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8
Accuracy	98.5%
Cost	840

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{z \cdot 0.39999999996247915 + 12.000000000000014}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9
Accuracy	98.4%
Cost	585

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{+27} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10
Accuracy	61.5%
Cost	456

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+150}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11
Accuracy	61.5%
Cost	456

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+150}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12
Accuracy	79.9%
Cost	320

\[x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014} \]

Alternative 13
Accuracy	52.2%
Cost	64

\[x \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023171 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z -8120153.652456675) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x)) (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20) (+ x (* (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304)))) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))