math.sqrt on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 40.3% → 84.2%

Time: 4.7s

Precision: binary64

Cost: 20356

Math

\[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]

↓

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}} \cdot -0.5\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))

↓

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ re (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))) 0.0)
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (* (/ im (/ re im)) -0.5))))
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re (hypot re im)))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}

↓

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re + sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * ((im / (re / im)) * -0.5)));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + hypot(re, im))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}

↓

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re + Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * ((im / (re / im)) * -0.5)));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + Math.hypot(re, im))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))

↓

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re + math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) <= 0.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * ((im / (re / im)) * -0.5)))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + math.hypot(re, im))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) + re))))
end

↓

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(re + sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im)))) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(im / Float64(re / im)) * -0.5))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + hypot(re, im)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
end

↓

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re + sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) <= 0.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * ((im / (re / im)) * -0.5)));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + hypot(re, im))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

↓

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[N[(re + N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[(im / N[(re / im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Target

Original	40.3%
Target	48.1%
Herbie	84.2%

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re < 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} - re}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 3.3%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]

   2. Simplified 11.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start] 3.3%	\[ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
      +-commutative [=>] 3.3%	\[ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]
      hypot-def [=>] 11.3%	\[ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in re around -inf 52.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{{im}^{2}}{re}\right)}} \]

   4. Simplified 71.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}} \cdot -0.5\right)}} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start] 52.8%	\[ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{{im}^{2}}{re}\right)} \]
      *-commutative [=>] 52.8%	\[ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{{im}^{2}}{re} \cdot -0.5\right)}} \]
      unpow2 [=>] 52.8%	\[ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re} \cdot -0.5\right)} \]
      associate-/l* [=>] 71.8%	\[ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}}} \cdot -0.5\right)} \]

   if 0.0 < (+.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re)

   1. Initial program 41.3%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]

   2. Simplified 89.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start] 41.3%	\[ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
      +-commutative [=>] 41.3%	\[ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]
      hypot-def [=>] 89.1%	\[ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}} \cdot -0.5\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy	84.2%
Cost	20356

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}} \cdot -0.5\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2
Accuracy	55.6%
Cost	7764

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ t_1 := 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}} \cdot -0.5\right)}\\ \mathbf{if}\;im \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-92}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re - im\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-219}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-236}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-203}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{-83}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3
Accuracy	57.0%
Cost	7112

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq -1.76 \cdot 10^{-102}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-im\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4
Accuracy	57.4%
Cost	7112

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-89}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re - im\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5
Accuracy	56.8%
Cost	6984

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{-104}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-im\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6
Accuracy	43.1%
Cost	6852

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{-128}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7
Accuracy	25.7%
Cost	6720

\[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023167 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.sqrt on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< re 0.0) (* 0.5 (* (sqrt 2.0) (sqrt (/ (* im im) (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re))))) (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))

  (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))