Math FPCore C Java Python Julia MATLAB Wolfram TeX \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)}
\]
↓
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im}{re} \cdot \left(-im\right)}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\\
\end{array}
\]
(FPCore (re im)
:precision binary64
(* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re))))) ↓
(FPCore (re im)
:precision binary64
(if (<= re -7.2e+46)
(* 0.5 (sqrt (* (/ im re) (- im))))
(* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re (hypot re im))))))) double code(double re, double im) {
return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}
↓
double code(double re, double im) {
double tmp;
if (re <= -7.2e+46) {
tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(((im / re) * -im));
} else {
tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + hypot(re, im))));
}
return tmp;
}
public static double code(double re, double im) {
return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}
↓
public static double code(double re, double im) {
double tmp;
if (re <= -7.2e+46) {
tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt(((im / re) * -im));
} else {
tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + Math.hypot(re, im))));
}
return tmp;
}
def code(re, im):
return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))
↓
def code(re, im):
tmp = 0
if re <= -7.2e+46:
tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt(((im / re) * -im))
else:
tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + math.hypot(re, im))))
return tmp
function code(re, im)
return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) + re))))
end
↓
function code(re, im)
tmp = 0.0
if (re <= -7.2e+46)
tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(im / re) * Float64(-im))));
else
tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + hypot(re, im)))));
end
return tmp
end
function tmp = code(re, im)
tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
end
↓
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
tmp = 0.0;
if (re <= -7.2e+46)
tmp = 0.5 * sqrt(((im / re) * -im));
else
tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + hypot(re, im))));
end
tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
↓
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -7.2e+46], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(im / re), $MachinePrecision] * (-im)), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)}
↓
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im}{re} \cdot \left(-im\right)}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\\
\end{array}
Alternatives Alternative 1 Accuracy 59.3% Cost 7376
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := 0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-138}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re - im\right)}\\
\mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-190}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\
\mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-168}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im}{re} \cdot \left(-im\right)}\\
\mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 2 Accuracy 59.0% Cost 7112
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq -2.55 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot \left(-2\right)}\\
\mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 3 Accuracy 59.7% Cost 7112
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{-139}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re - im\right)}\\
\mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 4 Accuracy 30.3% Cost 6984
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-200}:\\
\;\;\;\;265720.5\\
\mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 10^{-297}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 5 Accuracy 58.7% Cost 6984
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq -5.1 \cdot 10^{-141}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot \left(-2\right)}\\
\mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 6 Accuracy 41.9% Cost 6852
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;im \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 7 Accuracy 8.7% Cost 196
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+47}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;4.885243819643157 \cdot 10^{-22}\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 8 Accuracy 8.8% Cost 196
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;4.923200210024256 \cdot 10^{-15}\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 9 Accuracy 8.9% Cost 196
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{+48}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;1.071673525377229 \cdot 10^{-5}\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 10 Accuracy 8.9% Cost 196
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.0078125\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 11 Accuracy 8.9% Cost 196
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+48}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.28935185185185186\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 12 Accuracy 8.9% Cost 196
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;1.1851851851851851\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 13 Accuracy 8.9% Cost 196
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+47}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;1.6875\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 14 Accuracy 8.9% Cost 196
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;19.2216796875\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 15 Accuracy 9.0% Cost 196
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+48}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;265720.5\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 16 Accuracy 9.0% Cost 196
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;re \leq -4.9 \cdot 10^{+48}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;3812798742493.5\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 17 Accuracy 6.0% Cost 64
\[0
\]