?

Average Accuracy: 53.3% → 100.0%
Time: 2.1s
Precision: binary64
Cost: 64

?

\[\left(x + y\right) - x \]
\[y \]
(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (+ x y) x))
(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 y)
double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x + y) - x;
}
double code(double x, double y) {
	return y;
}
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (x + y) - x
end function
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = y
end function
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x + y) - x;
}
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return y;
}
def code(x, y):
	return (x + y) - x
def code(x, y):
	return y
function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) - x)
end
function code(x, y)
	return y
end
function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (x + y) - x;
end
function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = y;
end
code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y_] := y
\left(x + y\right) - x
y

Error?

Bogosity?

Bogosity

Try it out?

Your Program's Arguments

Results

Enter valid numbers for all inputs

Target

Original53.3%
Target100.0%
Herbie100.0%
\[y - 0 \]

Derivation?

  1. Initial program 53.5%

    \[\left(x + y\right) - x \]
  2. Simplified100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
    Proof

    [Start]53.5

    \[ \left(x + y\right) - x \]

    +-commutative [=>]53.5

    \[ \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} - x \]

    associate--l+ [=>]100.0

    \[ \color{blue}{y + \left(x - x\right)} \]

    +-inverses [=>]100.0

    \[ y + \color{blue}{0} \]

    +-rgt-identity [=>]100.0

    \[ \color{blue}{y} \]
  3. Final simplification100.0%

    \[\leadsto y \]

Reproduce?

herbie shell --seed 2023160 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Chart.Plot.Pie:renderPie from Chart-1.5.3"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- y 0.0)

  (- (+ x y) x))