2-ancestry mixing, positive discriminant

?

Percentage Accurate: 44.5% → 96.1%
Time: 19.5s
Precision: binary64
Cost: 19968

?

\[\sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2 \cdot a} \cdot \left(\left(-g\right) + \sqrt{g \cdot g - h \cdot h}\right)} + \sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2 \cdot a} \cdot \left(\left(-g\right) - \sqrt{g \cdot g - h \cdot h}\right)} \]
↓
\[\sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \frac{\sqrt[3]{g}}{\sqrt[3]{-a}} \]
(FPCore (g h a)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  (cbrt (* (/ 1.0 (* 2.0 a)) (+ (- g) (sqrt (- (* g g) (* h h))))))
  (cbrt (* (/ 1.0 (* 2.0 a)) (- (- g) (sqrt (- (* g g) (* h h))))))))
↓
(FPCore (g h a)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (cbrt (* (- g g) (/ -0.5 a))) (/ (cbrt g) (cbrt (- a)))))
double code(double g, double h, double a) {
	return cbrt(((1.0 / (2.0 * a)) * (-g + sqrt(((g * g) - (h * h)))))) + cbrt(((1.0 / (2.0 * a)) * (-g - sqrt(((g * g) - (h * h))))));
}
↓
double code(double g, double h, double a) {
	return cbrt(((g - g) * (-0.5 / a))) + (cbrt(g) / cbrt(-a));
}

public static double code(double g, double h, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt(((1.0 / (2.0 * a)) * (-g + Math.sqrt(((g * g) - (h * h)))))) + Math.cbrt(((1.0 / (2.0 * a)) * (-g - Math.sqrt(((g * g) - (h * h))))));
}
↓
public static double code(double g, double h, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt(((g - g) * (-0.5 / a))) + (Math.cbrt(g) / Math.cbrt(-a));
}

function code(g, h, a)
	return Float64(cbrt(Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(2.0 * a)) * Float64(Float64(-g) + sqrt(Float64(Float64(g * g) - Float64(h * h)))))) + cbrt(Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(2.0 * a)) * Float64(Float64(-g) - sqrt(Float64(Float64(g * g) - Float64(h * h)))))))
end
↓
function code(g, h, a)
	return Float64(cbrt(Float64(Float64(g - g) * Float64(-0.5 / a))) + Float64(cbrt(g) / cbrt(Float64(-a))))
end

code[g_, h_, a_] := N[(N[Power[N[(N[(1.0 / N[(2.0 * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[((-g) + N[Sqrt[N[(N[(g * g), $MachinePrecision] - N[(h * h), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision] + N[Power[N[(N[(1.0 / N[(2.0 * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[((-g) - N[Sqrt[N[(N[(g * g), $MachinePrecision] - N[(h * h), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
↓
code[g_, h_, a_] := N[(N[Power[N[(N[(g - g), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-0.5 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Power[g, 1/3], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[(-a), 1/3], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2 \cdot a} \cdot \left(\left(-g\right) + \sqrt{g \cdot g - h \cdot h}\right)} + \sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2 \cdot a} \cdot \left(\left(-g\right) - \sqrt{g \cdot g - h \cdot h}\right)}
↓
\sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \frac{\sqrt[3]{g}}{\sqrt[3]{-a}}

Local Percentage Accuracy?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Herbie found 3 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup

Accuracy vs Speed

The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each of Herbie's proposed alternatives. Up and to the right is better. Each dot represents an alternative program; the red square represents the initial program.

Try it out?

Your Program's Arguments

Results

Enter valid numbers for all inputs

Derivation?

  1. Initial program 45.4%

    \[\sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2 \cdot a} \cdot \left(\left(-g\right) + \sqrt{g \cdot g - h \cdot h}\right)} + \sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2 \cdot a} \cdot \left(\left(-g\right) - \sqrt{g \cdot g - h \cdot h}\right)} \]

  2. Simplified45.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(g - \sqrt{\left(g + h\right) \cdot \left(g - h\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \sqrt[3]{\left(g + \sqrt{\left(g + h\right) \cdot \left(g - h\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}}} \]
    Step-by-step derivation

    [Start]45.4

    \[ \sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2 \cdot a} \cdot \left(\left(-g\right) + \sqrt{g \cdot g - h \cdot h}\right)} + \sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2 \cdot a} \cdot \left(\left(-g\right) - \sqrt{g \cdot g - h \cdot h}\right)} \]

  3. Taylor expanded in g around inf 25.9%

    \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\left(g - \color{blue}{g}\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \sqrt[3]{\left(g + \sqrt{\left(g + h\right) \cdot \left(g - h\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} \]

  4. Taylor expanded in g around inf 73.5%

    \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{g}{a}}} \]

  5. Simplified73.5%

    \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{-g}{a}}} \]
    Step-by-step derivation

    [Start]73.5

    \[ \sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \sqrt[3]{-1 \cdot \frac{g}{a}} \]

    associate-*r/ [=>]73.5

    \[ \sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot g}{a}}} \]

    mul-1-neg [=>]73.5

    \[ \sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \sqrt[3]{\frac{\color{blue}{-g}}{a}} \]

  6. Applied egg-rr96.2%

    \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt[3]{g}}{\sqrt[3]{-a}}} \]
    Step-by-step derivation

    [Start]73.5

    \[ \sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \sqrt[3]{\frac{-g}{a}} \]

    frac-2neg [=>]73.5

    \[ \sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{-\left(-g\right)}{-a}}} \]

    cbrt-div [=>]96.2

    \[ \sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt[3]{-\left(-g\right)}}{\sqrt[3]{-a}}} \]

    remove-double-neg [=>]96.2

    \[ \sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \frac{\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{g}}}{\sqrt[3]{-a}} \]

  7. Final simplification96.2%

    \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \frac{\sqrt[3]{g}}{\sqrt[3]{-a}} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy73.8%
Cost13568
\[\sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \sqrt[3]{-\frac{g}{a}} \]
Alternative 2
Accuracy1.4%
Cost13504
\[\sqrt[3]{\left(g - g\right) \cdot \frac{-0.5}{a}} + \sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{a}} \]

Reproduce?

herbie shell --seed 2023160 
(FPCore (g h a)
  :name "2-ancestry mixing, positive discriminant"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (cbrt (* (/ 1.0 (* 2.0 a)) (+ (- g) (sqrt (- (* g g) (* h h)))))) (cbrt (* (/ 1.0 (* 2.0 a)) (- (- g) (sqrt (- (* g g) (* h h))))))))