math.log10 on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 51.0% → 99.1%

Time: 13.5s

Precision: binary64

Cost: 38912

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

• Unsound rule application detected in e-graph. Results may not be sound.

Math

\[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log 10} \]

↓

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sqrt{\log 10}\\ \frac{1}{t_0} \cdot \frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{t_0} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (log (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))) (log 10.0)))

↓

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (sqrt (log 10.0)))) (* (/ 1.0 t_0) (/ (log (hypot re im)) t_0))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / log(10.0);
}

↓

double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = sqrt(log(10.0));
	return (1.0 / t_0) * (log(hypot(re, im)) / t_0);
}

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.log(Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / Math.log(10.0);
}

↓

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = Math.sqrt(Math.log(10.0));
	return (1.0 / t_0) * (Math.log(Math.hypot(re, im)) / t_0);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.log(math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / math.log(10.0)

↓

def code(re, im):
	t_0 = math.sqrt(math.log(10.0))
	return (1.0 / t_0) * (math.log(math.hypot(re, im)) / t_0)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(log(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im)))) / log(10.0))
end

↓

function code(re, im)
	t_0 = sqrt(log(10.0))
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / t_0) * Float64(log(hypot(re, im)) / t_0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / log(10.0);
end

↓

function tmp = code(re, im)
	t_0 = sqrt(log(10.0));
	tmp = (1.0 / t_0) * (log(hypot(re, im)) / t_0);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Log[N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[Log[10.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

↓

code[re_, im_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Sqrt[N[Log[10.0], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Log[N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Initial program 51.4%

   \[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log 10} \]

2. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log 10}} \]
   Step-by-step derivation

   [Start] 51.4	\[ \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log 10} \]
   hypot-def [=>] 99.1	\[ \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}{\log 10} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{\log 10}} \cdot \frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\sqrt{\log 10}}} \]
   Step-by-step derivation

   [Start] 99.1	\[ \frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log 10} \]
   *-un-lft-identity [=>] 99.1	\[ \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}{\log 10} \]
   add-sqr-sqrt [=>] 99.1	\[ \frac{1 \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\log 10} \cdot \sqrt{\log 10}}} \]
   times-frac [=>] 99.1	\[ \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{\log 10}} \cdot \frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\sqrt{\log 10}}} \]

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\sqrt{\log 10}} \cdot \frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\sqrt{\log 10}} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy	99.0%
Cost	32448

\[3 \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{\log 0.1}\right)}}\right) \]

Alternative 2
Accuracy	99.0%
Cost	19584

\[\frac{1}{\frac{\log 10}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

Alternative 3
Accuracy	99.0%
Cost	19520

\[\frac{-\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log 0.1} \]

Alternative 4
Accuracy	99.1%
Cost	19456

\[\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log 10} \]

Alternative 5
Accuracy	43.6%
Cost	13844

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{-\log im}{\log 0.1}\\ t_1 := \log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)\\ t_2 := \frac{-t_1}{\log 10}\\ \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-149}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t_1}{\log 0.1}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-109}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{-92}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-50}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log im}{\log 10}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6
Accuracy	43.7%
Cost	13844

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{-\log im}{\log 0.1}\\ t_1 := \log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)\\ t_2 := \frac{-t_1}{\log 10}\\ \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 3.05 \cdot 10^{-148}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{-\log 10}{t_1}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-109}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{-94}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-50}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log im}{\log 10}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7
Accuracy	43.6%
Cost	13780

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{-\log im}{\log 0.1}\\ t_1 := \frac{\log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)}{\log 0.1}\\ \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-148}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-109}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 5.9 \cdot 10^{-92}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-50}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;im \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log im}{\log 10}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8
Accuracy	34.3%
Cost	13124

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-305}:\\ \;\;\;\;101\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log im}{\log 10}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9
Accuracy	5.1%
Cost	64

\[-3 \]

Alternative 10
Accuracy	11.3%
Cost	64

\[1.5 \]

Alternative 11
Accuracy	11.6%
Cost	64

\[3 \]

Alternative 12
Accuracy	12.0%
Cost	64

\[6 \]

Alternative 13
Accuracy	12.2%
Cost	64

\[9 \]

Alternative 14
Accuracy	12.3%
Cost	64

\[11 \]

Alternative 15
Accuracy	12.8%
Cost	64

\[20 \]

Alternative 16
Accuracy	14.4%
Cost	64

\[81 \]

Alternative 17
Accuracy	14.7%
Cost	64

\[100 \]

Alternative 18
Accuracy	14.7%
Cost	64

\[101 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023160 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.log10 on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (log (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))) (log 10.0)))