Math FPCore C Julia Wolfram TeX \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)
\]
↓
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot t_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+306}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot t_1, x\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
(FPCore (x y z t)
:precision binary64
(+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))) ↓
(FPCore (x y z t)
:precision binary64
(let* ((t_1 (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))
(if (<= (+ x (* (* y z) t_1)) 2e+306) (fma z (* y t_1) x) (* z (- t x))))) double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}
↓
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
double t_1 = tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y));
double tmp;
if ((x + ((y * z) * t_1)) <= 2e+306) {
tmp = fma(z, (y * t_1), x);
} else {
tmp = z * (t - x);
}
return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z, t)
return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end
↓
function code(x, y, z, t)
t_1 = Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))
tmp = 0.0
if (Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * t_1)) <= 2e+306)
tmp = fma(z, Float64(y * t_1), x);
else
tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t - x));
end
return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
↓
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+306], N[(z * N[(y * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)
↓
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot t_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+306}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot t_1, x\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\
\end{array}
Alternatives Alternative 1 Accuracy 98.0% Cost 27332
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot t_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+306}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot t_1\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 2 Accuracy 86.0% Cost 13768
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+132}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot t_1, x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 3 Accuracy 85.7% Cost 7241
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{+125} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 9.4 \cdot 10^{+135}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 4 Accuracy 64.5% Cost 850
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+65} \lor \neg \left(z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+28}\right) \land \left(z \leq -202000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+97}\right)\right):\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 5 Accuracy 63.8% Cost 848
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\
\;\;\;\;x - x \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 6 Accuracy 77.9% Cost 713
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-9} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 460000000000\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 7 Accuracy 59.0% Cost 521
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+148} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+108}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 8 Accuracy 59.6% Cost 456
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-110}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{-307}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 9 Accuracy 60.7% Cost 64
\[x
\]