| Alternative 1 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 86.9% |
|---|
| Cost | 13257 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+64} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.3 \cdot 10^{+60}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \sin y, z\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 2 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 99.8% |
|---|
| Cost | 13248 |
|---|
\[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y
\]
| Alternative 3 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 72.4% |
|---|
| Cost | 7384 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := x \cdot \sin y\\
t_1 := z \cdot \cos y\\
t_2 := z + x \cdot y\\
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-37}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-170}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-185}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-249}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-99}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-71}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 4 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 86.7% |
|---|
| Cost | 6985 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+69} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.7 \cdot 10^{+70}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z + x \cdot \sin y\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 5 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 74.5% |
|---|
| Cost | 6857 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.112 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 200000000\right):\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 6 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 42.0% |
|---|
| Cost | 456 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-200}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-166}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\
\end{array}
\]