Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Average Accuracy: 88.4% → 88.4%

Time: 3.1s

Precision: binary64

Cost: 704

Math

\[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

↓

\[\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{2} \cdot z\right) + t \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))

↓

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (- (* 0.125 x) (* (/ y 2.0) z)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

↓

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((0.125 * x) - ((y / 2.0) * z)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((1.0d0 / 8.0d0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function

↓

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((0.125d0 * x) - ((y / 2.0d0) * z)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

↓

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((0.125 * x) - ((y / 2.0) * z)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t

↓

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((0.125 * x) - ((y / 2.0) * z)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 8.0) * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end

↓

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(0.125 * x) - Float64(Float64(y / 2.0) * z)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end

↓

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((0.125 * x) - ((y / 2.0) * z)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

↓

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Target

Original	88.4%
Target	88.4%
Herbie	88.4%

\[\left(\frac{x}{8} + t\right) - \frac{z}{2} \cdot y \]

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

2. Simplified 84.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{2} \cdot z\right) + t} \]
   Step-by-step derivation

   [Start] 84.0	\[ \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   sub-neg [=>] 84.0	\[ \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]
   +-commutative [=>] 84.0	\[ \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right)} + t \]
   neg-sub0 [=>] 84.0	\[ \left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right) + t \]
   associate-+l- [=>] 84.0	\[ \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(\frac{y \cdot z}{2} - \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right)\right)} + t \]
   sub-neg [=>] 84.0	\[ \left(0 - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y \cdot z}{2} + \left(-\frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) + t \]
   +-commutative [=>] 84.0	\[ \left(0 - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right) + \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)}\right) + t \]
   associate--r+ [=>] 84.0	\[ \color{blue}{\left(\left(0 - \left(-\frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right)\right) - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]
   neg-sub0 [<=] 84.0	\[ \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right)\right)} - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   distribute-rgt-neg-in [=>] 84.0	\[ \left(\left(-\color{blue}{\frac{1}{8} \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right) - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   distribute-rgt-neg-in [=>] 84.0	\[ \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{8} \cdot \left(-\left(-x\right)\right)} - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   metadata-eval [=>] 84.0	\[ \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot \left(-\left(-x\right)\right) - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   remove-double-neg [=>] 84.0	\[ \left(0.125 \cdot \color{blue}{x} - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   associate-*l/ [<=] 84.0	\[ \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{2} \cdot z}\right) + t \]

3. Final simplification 84.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{2} \cdot z\right) + t \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy	76.0%
Cost	969

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(y \cdot z \leq 10^{-20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x + t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2
Accuracy	61.6%
Cost	585

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-42} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{+263}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x + t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3
Accuracy	46.1%
Cost	584

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-43}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+48}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4
Accuracy	34.1%
Cost	64

\[t \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023157 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (+ (/ x 8.0) t) (* (/ z 2.0) y))

  (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))