| Alternative 1 | |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | 76.2% |
| Cost | 585 |
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{-1}{x \cdot x}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{-2}{x} - x\\
\end{array}
\]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (+ (- (/ 1.0 (+ x 1.0)) (/ 2.0 x)) (/ 1.0 (- x 1.0))))
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ -2.0 (* (+ x 1.0) (- x (* x x)))))
double code(double x) {
return ((1.0 / (x + 1.0)) - (2.0 / x)) + (1.0 / (x - 1.0));
}
double code(double x) {
return -2.0 / ((x + 1.0) * (x - (x * x)));
}
real(8) function code(x)
real(8), intent (in) :: x
code = ((1.0d0 / (x + 1.0d0)) - (2.0d0 / x)) + (1.0d0 / (x - 1.0d0))
end function
real(8) function code(x)
real(8), intent (in) :: x
code = (-2.0d0) / ((x + 1.0d0) * (x - (x * x)))
end function
public static double code(double x) {
return ((1.0 / (x + 1.0)) - (2.0 / x)) + (1.0 / (x - 1.0));
}
public static double code(double x) {
return -2.0 / ((x + 1.0) * (x - (x * x)));
}
def code(x): return ((1.0 / (x + 1.0)) - (2.0 / x)) + (1.0 / (x - 1.0))
def code(x): return -2.0 / ((x + 1.0) * (x - (x * x)))
function code(x) return Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(x + 1.0)) - Float64(2.0 / x)) + Float64(1.0 / Float64(x - 1.0))) end
function code(x) return Float64(-2.0 / Float64(Float64(x + 1.0) * Float64(x - Float64(x * x)))) end
function tmp = code(x) tmp = ((1.0 / (x + 1.0)) - (2.0 / x)) + (1.0 / (x - 1.0)); end
function tmp = code(x) tmp = -2.0 / ((x + 1.0) * (x - (x * x))); end
code[x_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 / N[(x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(2.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
code[x_] := N[(-2.0 / N[(N[(x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x - N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\left(\frac{1}{x + 1} - \frac{2}{x}\right) + \frac{1}{x - 1}
\frac{-2}{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x - x \cdot x\right)}
Results
| Original | 84.6% |
|---|---|
| Target | 99.6% |
| Herbie | 99.6% |
Initial program 86.5%
Simplified86.5%
Applied egg-rr60.8%
Simplified60.8%
Taylor expanded in x around 0 52.8%
Applied egg-rr60.4%
Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.6%
Final simplification99.6%
| Alternative 1 | |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | 76.2% |
| Cost | 585 |
| Alternative 2 | |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | 76.6% |
| Cost | 584 |
| Alternative 3 | |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | 83.3% |
| Cost | 448 |
| Alternative 4 | |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | 51.6% |
| Cost | 192 |
| Alternative 5 | |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | 3.3% |
| Cost | 64 |
| Alternative 6 | |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | 3.2% |
| Cost | 64 |
herbie shell --seed 2023157 -o generate:proofs
(FPCore (x)
:name "3frac (problem 3.3.3)"
:precision binary64
:herbie-target
(/ 2.0 (* x (- (* x x) 1.0)))
(+ (- (/ 1.0 (+ x 1.0)) (/ 2.0 x)) (/ 1.0 (- x 1.0))))