| Alternative 1 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 95.4% |
|---|
| Cost | 13476 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;-\log \left(1 - u1\right) \leq 0.05999999865889549:\\
\;\;\;\;\cos \left(u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{u1 - \left(u1 \cdot u1\right) \cdot \left(-0.5 + u1 \cdot -0.3333333333333333\right)}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u1\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(u1 \cdot \left(-u1\right)\right)}\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 2 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 94.7% |
|---|
| Cost | 13348 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 0.0026000000070780516:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\cos t_0 \cdot \sqrt{u1 - \left(u1 \cdot u1\right) \cdot -0.5}\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 3 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 90.7% |
|---|
| Cost | 13156 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right) \leq 0.007000000216066837:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{u1} \cdot \cos \left(\pi \cdot \left(2 \cdot u2\right)\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 4 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 79.9% |
|---|
| Cost | 6496 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)}
\]
| Alternative 5 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 75.3% |
|---|
| Cost | 3552 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{u1 - \left(u1 \cdot u1\right) \cdot \left(-0.5 + u1 \cdot -0.3333333333333333\right)}
\]
| Alternative 6 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 72.7% |
|---|
| Cost | 3424 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{u1 - u1 \cdot \left(u1 \cdot -0.5\right)}
\]