Math FPCore C Julia Wolfram TeX \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b
\]
↓
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-109}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(t \cdot a + t_1\right) + b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 10^{-55}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + t \cdot a\right) + t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
:precision binary64
(+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b))) ↓
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
:precision binary64
(let* ((t_1 (+ x (* y z))))
(if (<= y -1e-109)
(+ (+ (* t a) t_1) (* b (* z a)))
(if (<= y 1e-55)
(+ (+ (* a (* z b)) (* t a)) t_1)
(fma z (fma a b y) (fma t a x)))))) double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}
↓
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
double t_1 = x + (y * z);
double tmp;
if (y <= -1e-109) {
tmp = ((t * a) + t_1) + (b * (z * a));
} else if (y <= 1e-55) {
tmp = ((a * (z * b)) + (t * a)) + t_1;
} else {
tmp = fma(z, fma(a, b, y), fma(t, a, x));
}
return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end
↓
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(y * z))
tmp = 0.0
if (y <= -1e-109)
tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(t * a) + t_1) + Float64(b * Float64(z * a)));
elseif (y <= 1e-55)
tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(a * Float64(z * b)) + Float64(t * a)) + t_1);
else
tmp = fma(z, fma(a, b, y), fma(t, a, x));
end
return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
↓
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1e-109], N[(N[(N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1e-55], N[(N[(N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(a * b + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]
\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b
↓
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-109}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(t \cdot a + t_1\right) + b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 10^{-55}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + t \cdot a\right) + t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\right)\\
\end{array}
Alternatives Alternative 1 Accuracy 49.1% Cost 1640
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{-109}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-237}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-283}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{-285}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-281}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{-240}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-34}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 2 Accuracy 49.0% Cost 1640
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.75 \cdot 10^{+26}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -3.15 \cdot 10^{-109}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-238}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-283}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{-285}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-280}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{-234}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\
\;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 3 Accuracy 70.0% Cost 1504
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := t \cdot a + y \cdot z\\
t_2 := x + y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-283}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-287}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-222}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-140}:\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-51}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 4 Accuracy 49.5% Cost 1376
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.16 \cdot 10^{-109}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-239}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-282}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-238}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-34}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 5 Accuracy 49.6% Cost 1248
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-109}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-236}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-280}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{-238}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 6 Accuracy 95.9% Cost 1225
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{-149} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-261}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 7 Accuracy 69.3% Cost 1108
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+80}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{-60}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-77}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -2.75 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+28}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 8 Accuracy 82.0% Cost 1105
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := \left(x + t \cdot a\right) + y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-283}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-287}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-219} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{-141}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 9 Accuracy 97.9% Cost 1092
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-132}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + t \cdot a\right) + t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(t \cdot a + t_1\right) + b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 10 Accuracy 83.4% Cost 972
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\
t_2 := x + t_1\\
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq -2.75 \cdot 10^{+116}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1 + t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+171}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(x + t \cdot a\right) + y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 11 Accuracy 66.0% Cost 849
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-56}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{+27} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+185}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 12 Accuracy 68.4% Cost 844
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-50}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+185}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 13 Accuracy 87.6% Cost 841
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{+31} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.38 \cdot 10^{-70}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;\left(x + t \cdot a\right) + y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 14 Accuracy 57.7% Cost 716
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-48}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+185}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 15 Accuracy 68.4% Cost 713
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-44} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 16 Accuracy 49.4% Cost 456
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 17 Accuracy 39.0% Cost 64
\[x
\]