| Alternative 1 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 90.7% |
|---|
| Cost | 22984 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right)\\
t_1 := \sin t_0\\
\mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -0.10000000149011612:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1 \cdot \sqrt{3 \cdot \left(u1 \cdot \left(--0.3333333333333333\right)\right)}\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t_1 \leq 0.012000000104308128:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)} \cdot t_0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1 \cdot \sqrt{u1}\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 2 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 95.6% |
|---|
| Cost | 13476 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 0.0012000000569969416:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)} \cdot t_0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{u1 - \left(u1 \cdot u1\right) \cdot \left(-0.5 + u1 \cdot -0.3333333333333333\right)} \cdot \sin t_0\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 3 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 94.3% |
|---|
| Cost | 13380 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 0.0013000000035390258:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)} \cdot t_0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sin t_0 \cdot \sqrt{\left(-u1\right) \cdot \left(u1 \cdot -0.5 + -1\right)}\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 4 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 94.3% |
|---|
| Cost | 13348 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 0.0013000000035390258:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)} \cdot t_0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sin t_0 \cdot \sqrt{u1 - u1 \cdot \left(u1 \cdot -0.5\right)}\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 5 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 90.8% |
|---|
| Cost | 13220 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 0.012000000104308128:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)} \cdot t_0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sin t_0 \cdot \sqrt{u1}\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 6 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 98.4% |
|---|
| Cost | 13056 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)} \cdot \sin \left(2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u2\right)\right)
\]
| Alternative 7 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 81.5% |
|---|
| Cost | 9856 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)} \cdot \left(u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right)\right)
\]
| Alternative 8 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 76.6% |
|---|
| Cost | 6912 |
|---|
\[\left(u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{u1 - \left(u1 \cdot u1\right) \cdot \left(-0.5 + u1 \cdot -0.3333333333333333\right)}
\]
| Alternative 9 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 74.0% |
|---|
| Cost | 6784 |
|---|
\[\left(u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{u1 - u1 \cdot \left(u1 \cdot -0.5\right)}
\]
| Alternative 10 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 66.1% |
|---|
| Cost | 6656 |
|---|
\[2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \sqrt{u1 \cdot \left(u2 \cdot u2\right)}\right)
\]
| Alternative 11 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 66.1% |
|---|
| Cost | 6592 |
|---|
\[2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u2 \cdot \sqrt{u1}\right)\right)
\]
| Alternative 12 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 66.1% |
|---|
| Cost | 6592 |
|---|
\[u2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{u1}\right)\right)
\]