\[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right)
\]
↓
\[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right)
\]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))
↓
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}
↓
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
real(8), intent (in) :: x
real(8), intent (in) :: y
real(8), intent (in) :: z
code = (x + y) * (z + 1.0d0)
end function
↓
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
real(8), intent (in) :: x
real(8), intent (in) :: y
real(8), intent (in) :: z
code = (x + y) * (z + 1.0d0)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}
↓
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}
def code(x, y, z):
return (x + y) * (z + 1.0)
↓
def code(x, y, z):
return (x + y) * (z + 1.0)
function code(x, y, z)
return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(z + 1.0))
end
↓
function code(x, y, z)
return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(z + 1.0))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
tmp = (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
end
↓
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
tmp = (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
↓
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right)
↓
\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right)
Alternatives
| Alternative 1 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 97.2% |
|---|
| Cost | 585 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 2 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 80.9% |
|---|
| Cost | 584 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 3 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 81.2% |
|---|
| Cost | 584 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 4 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 48.0% |
|---|
| Cost | 456 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\
\;\;\;\;y\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 5 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 48.3% |
|---|
| Cost | 456 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\
\;\;\;\;y\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 6 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 80.5% |
|---|
| Cost | 456 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.55:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 7 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 32.2% |
|---|
| Cost | 64 |
|---|
\[y
\]