?

Average Accuracy: 99.6% → 99.6%
Time: 16.7s
Precision: binary64
Cost: 19520

?

\[e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]
\[e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]
(FPCore (w l) :precision binary64 (* (exp (- w)) (pow l (exp w))))
(FPCore (w l) :precision binary64 (* (exp (- w)) (pow l (exp w))))
double code(double w, double l) {
	return exp(-w) * pow(l, exp(w));
}
double code(double w, double l) {
	return exp(-w) * pow(l, exp(w));
}
real(8) function code(w, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: w
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = exp(-w) * (l ** exp(w))
end function
real(8) function code(w, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: w
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = exp(-w) * (l ** exp(w))
end function
public static double code(double w, double l) {
	return Math.exp(-w) * Math.pow(l, Math.exp(w));
}
public static double code(double w, double l) {
	return Math.exp(-w) * Math.pow(l, Math.exp(w));
}
def code(w, l):
	return math.exp(-w) * math.pow(l, math.exp(w))
def code(w, l):
	return math.exp(-w) * math.pow(l, math.exp(w))
function code(w, l)
	return Float64(exp(Float64(-w)) * (l ^ exp(w)))
end
function code(w, l)
	return Float64(exp(Float64(-w)) * (l ^ exp(w)))
end
function tmp = code(w, l)
	tmp = exp(-w) * (l ^ exp(w));
end
function tmp = code(w, l)
	tmp = exp(-w) * (l ^ exp(w));
end
code[w_, l_] := N[(N[Exp[(-w)], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[l, N[Exp[w], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
code[w_, l_] := N[(N[Exp[(-w)], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[l, N[Exp[w], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}
e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}

Error?

Try it out?

Your Program's Arguments

Results

Enter valid numbers for all inputs

Derivation?

  1. Initial program 99.6%

    \[e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]
  2. Final simplification99.6%

    \[\leadsto e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy99.6%
Cost19456
\[\frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{w}} \]
Alternative 2
Accuracy97.8%
Cost13440
\[e^{-w} \cdot \left(\ell + \ell \cdot \left(w \cdot \log \ell\right)\right) \]
Alternative 3
Accuracy97.8%
Cost13376
\[\frac{\ell + \ell \cdot \left(w \cdot \log \ell\right)}{e^{w}} \]
Alternative 4
Accuracy97.2%
Cost6656
\[e^{-w} \cdot \ell \]
Alternative 5
Accuracy97.2%
Cost6592
\[\frac{\ell}{e^{w}} \]
Alternative 6
Accuracy79.8%
Cost1348
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;w \leq 0.054:\\ \;\;\;\;\ell \cdot \left(1 - w\right) + \left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(\ell \cdot 0.5 - w \cdot \left(\ell \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\ell \cdot \ell - \left(w \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(w \cdot \ell\right)}{\ell + w \cdot \ell}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 7
Accuracy78.5%
Cost64
\[\ell \]

Error

Reproduce?

herbie shell --seed 2023138 
(FPCore (w l)
  :name "exp-w (used to crash)"
  :precision binary64
  (* (exp (- w)) (pow l (exp w))))