Math FPCore C Julia Wolfram TeX \[\left(\left(x - \left(y - 1\right) \cdot z\right) - \left(t - 1\right) \cdot a\right) + \left(\left(y + t\right) - 2\right) \cdot b
\]
↓
\[\mathsf{fma}\left(y + \left(t + -2\right), b, x - \mathsf{fma}\left(y + -1, z, a \cdot \left(t + -1\right)\right)\right)
\]
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
:precision binary64
(+ (- (- x (* (- y 1.0) z)) (* (- t 1.0) a)) (* (- (+ y t) 2.0) b))) ↓
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
:precision binary64
(fma (+ y (+ t -2.0)) b (- x (fma (+ y -1.0) z (* a (+ t -1.0)))))) double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
return ((x - ((y - 1.0) * z)) - ((t - 1.0) * a)) + (((y + t) - 2.0) * b);
}
↓
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
return fma((y + (t + -2.0)), b, (x - fma((y + -1.0), z, (a * (t + -1.0)))));
}
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
return Float64(Float64(Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y - 1.0) * z)) - Float64(Float64(t - 1.0) * a)) + Float64(Float64(Float64(y + t) - 2.0) * b))
end
↓
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
return fma(Float64(y + Float64(t + -2.0)), b, Float64(x - fma(Float64(y + -1.0), z, Float64(a * Float64(t + -1.0)))))
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x - N[(N[(y - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(t - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[(y + t), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
↓
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(y + N[(t + -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * b + N[(x - N[(N[(y + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * z + N[(a * N[(t + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\left(\left(x - \left(y - 1\right) \cdot z\right) - \left(t - 1\right) \cdot a\right) + \left(\left(y + t\right) - 2\right) \cdot b
↓
\mathsf{fma}\left(y + \left(t + -2\right), b, x - \mathsf{fma}\left(y + -1, z, a \cdot \left(t + -1\right)\right)\right)
Alternatives Alternative 1 Accuracy 38.9% Cost 1904
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + t \cdot b\\
t_2 := a - t \cdot a\\
t_3 := b \cdot \left(t + -2\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_3\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{-299}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-256}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-210}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-183}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{-148}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 0.00019:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+104}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+172}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{+218}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_3\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(y + -2\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 2 Accuracy 44.4% Cost 1768
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + t \cdot b\\
t_2 := b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
t_3 := z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\
t_4 := a - t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -8.6 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_4\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-73}:\\
\;\;\;\;x - t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{-282}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{-301}:\\
\;\;\;\;x - y \cdot z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-279}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-234}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_3\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-223}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-198}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_3\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_4\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 3 Accuracy 66.9% Cost 1628
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
t_2 := x + a \cdot \left(1 - t\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -90000000000000:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(\left(z + a\right) - y \cdot z\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{-86}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-297}:\\
\;\;\;\;a + \left(x - b \cdot \left(2 - y\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-196}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1480:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(x + t \cdot b\right) + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 4 Accuracy 42.9% Cost 1508
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + t \cdot b\\
t_2 := a - t \cdot a\\
t_3 := b \cdot \left(t + -2\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{+61}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-72}:\\
\;\;\;\;x - t \cdot a\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{-211}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{-284}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_3\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-272}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-235}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-219}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+80}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_3\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 5 Accuracy 50.7% Cost 1504
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + a \cdot \left(1 - t\right)\\
t_2 := b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -12000:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -2.25 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-222}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-263}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z + t \cdot b\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 6 Accuracy 100.0% Cost 1472
\[\left(x + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\right) + \left(\left(t \cdot b - b \cdot \left(2 - y\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(1 - t\right)\right)
\]
Alternative 7 Accuracy 20.8% Cost 1444
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := a \cdot \left(-t\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+76}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -1.88:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-161}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{-248}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-287}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-244}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.18 \cdot 10^{+28}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{+94}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot b\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 8 Accuracy 38.9% Cost 1376
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + t \cdot b\\
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\
\;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(t + -2\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-300}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-255}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-211}:\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(-t\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+183}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(y + -2\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 9 Accuracy 70.2% Cost 1369
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + \left(\left(z + a\right) - y \cdot z\right)\\
t_2 := x + b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-259}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{-215}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(1 - t\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 7.4 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+82}\right) \land b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+183}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 10 Accuracy 70.6% Cost 1368
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + \left(z + \left(a - t \cdot a\right)\right)\\
t_2 := x + b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-151}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(\left(z + a\right) - y \cdot z\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(x + t \cdot b\right) + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+183}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 11 Accuracy 70.6% Cost 1368
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + \left(z + \left(a - t \cdot a\right)\right)\\
t_2 := x + b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-149}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(\left(z + a\right) - y \cdot z\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+42}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\
\;\;\;\;z + \left(x + b \cdot \left(t + -2\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+183}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 12 Accuracy 79.5% Cost 1362
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq -9.4 \cdot 10^{-29} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-15}\right) \land \left(b \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+82} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+183}\right)\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x + b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot \left(1 - y\right) + a \cdot \left(1 - t\right)\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 13 Accuracy 87.2% Cost 1357
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := a \cdot \left(1 - t\right)\\
t_2 := z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\
t_3 := x + b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{+106}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(t_2 + t_1\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-62} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{-45}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;t_3 + t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_3 + t_2\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 14 Accuracy 100.0% Cost 1344
\[\left(\left(x + z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(1 - t\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)
\]
Alternative 15 Accuracy 70.9% Cost 1237
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + \left(z + \left(a - t \cdot a\right)\right)\\
t_2 := x + b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-149}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(\left(z + a\right) - y \cdot z\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{+82} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+183}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 16 Accuracy 87.1% Cost 1225
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := z \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+113} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{+79}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(t_1 + a \cdot \left(1 - t\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(x + b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\right) + t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 17 Accuracy 28.4% Cost 1120
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+157}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+41}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2.45 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-304}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{-163}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-94}:\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-43}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 18 Accuracy 39.5% Cost 1113
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := b \cdot \left(t + -2\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-255}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-211}:\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(-t\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{-61} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+81}\right) \land b \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 19 Accuracy 57.1% Cost 1108
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + \left(z - y \cdot z\right)\\
t_2 := x + a \cdot \left(1 - t\right)\\
t_3 := b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-62}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{-202}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-242}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_3\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_3\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 20 Accuracy 57.0% Cost 1108
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + a \cdot \left(1 - t\right)\\
t_2 := b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-72}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-202}:\\
\;\;\;\;z + \left(x + t \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-241}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(z - y \cdot z\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 21 Accuracy 57.0% Cost 1108
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + a \cdot \left(1 - t\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-72}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-202}:\\
\;\;\;\;z + \left(x + t \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-241}:\\
\;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(y + t\right) + -2 \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.32 \cdot 10^{-48}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(z - y \cdot z\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\
\;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 22 Accuracy 61.6% Cost 1104
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + b \cdot \left(-2 + \left(y + t\right)\right)\\
t_2 := x + a \cdot \left(1 - t\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{+104}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{-266}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(z - y \cdot z\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{+80}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 23 Accuracy 32.7% Cost 1048
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;t \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -6.3 \cdot 10^{-77}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-252}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 6.1 \cdot 10^{-288}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+42}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(-t\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 24 Accuracy 25.6% Cost 984
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+182}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-111}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq -3.65 \cdot 10^{-308}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+178}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot b\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot b\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 25 Accuracy 43.4% Cost 980
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := y \cdot \left(b - z\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -3.15 \cdot 10^{-21}:\\
\;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(b - a\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-236}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-126}:\\
\;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(t + -2\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 26 Accuracy 41.4% Cost 848
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := t \cdot \left(b - a\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-246}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 6.1 \cdot 10^{-288}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 27 Accuracy 29.9% Cost 592
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{+157}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -3.05 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot b\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+26}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.05 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 28 Accuracy 30.6% Cost 328
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.58 \cdot 10^{+32}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\
\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+60}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 29 Accuracy 23.0% Cost 64
\[x
\]