| Alternative 1 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 94.8% |
|---|
| Cost | 13348 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right) \leq 0.0008999999845400453:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\cos \left(2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u2\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{u1 + \left(u1 \cdot u1\right) \cdot 0.5}\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 2 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 90.8% |
|---|
| Cost | 13156 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right) \leq 0.012500000186264515:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\cos \left(2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u2\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{u1}\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 3 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 92.3% |
|---|
| Cost | 10112 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{u1 - \left(u1 \cdot u1\right) \cdot \left(-0.5 + u1 \cdot -0.3333333333333333\right)} \cdot \cos \left(u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right)\right)
\]
| Alternative 4 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 80.0% |
|---|
| Cost | 6496 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)}
\]
| Alternative 5 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 76.7% |
|---|
| Cost | 3680 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{u1 - \left(u1 \cdot u1\right) \cdot \left(-0.5 + u1 \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 + u1 \cdot -0.25\right)\right)}
\]
| Alternative 6 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 75.5% |
|---|
| Cost | 3552 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{u1 - \left(u1 \cdot u1\right) \cdot \left(-0.5 + u1 \cdot -0.3333333333333333\right)}
\]
| Alternative 7 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 73.0% |
|---|
| Cost | 3424 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{u1 + \left(u1 \cdot u1\right) \cdot 0.5}
\]