Math FPCore C Julia Wolfram TeX \[x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)}
\]
↓
\[x \cdot e^{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \log z - t, a \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-z\right) - b\right)\right)}
\]
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
:precision binary64
(* x (exp (+ (* y (- (log z) t)) (* a (- (log (- 1.0 z)) b)))))) ↓
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
:precision binary64
(* x (exp (fma y (- (log z) t) (* a (- (log1p (- z)) b)))))) double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
return x * exp(((y * (log(z) - t)) + (a * (log((1.0 - z)) - b))));
}
↓
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
return x * exp(fma(y, (log(z) - t), (a * (log1p(-z) - b))));
}
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
return Float64(x * exp(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(log(z) - t)) + Float64(a * Float64(log(Float64(1.0 - z)) - b)))))
end
↓
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
return Float64(x * exp(fma(y, Float64(log(z) - t), Float64(a * Float64(log1p(Float64(-z)) - b)))))
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * N[Exp[N[(N[(y * N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
↓
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * N[Exp[N[(y * N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(N[Log[1 + (-z)], $MachinePrecision] - b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)}
↓
x \cdot e^{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \log z - t, a \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-z\right) - b\right)\right)}
Alternatives Alternative 1 Accuracy 98.5% Cost 13636
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) - a \cdot b}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 0\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 2 Accuracy 94.1% Cost 13576
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-165}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(-t\right) - a \cdot b}\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot e^{a \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-z\right) - b\right)}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right)}\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 3 Accuracy 95.5% Cost 13380
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(-t\right) - a \cdot b}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right)}\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 4 Accuracy 39.9% Cost 7189
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{-83}:\\
\;\;\;\;{x}^{-3}\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.0003:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+94} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+132}\right) \land y \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+153}:\\
\;\;\;\;{x}^{-3}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(x \cdot b\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 5 Accuracy 96.7% Cost 7172
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 0.006:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(-t\right) - a \cdot b}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 0\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 6 Accuracy 91.2% Cost 6984
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.0043:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 0\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.02 \cdot 10^{-20}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{x}{e^{a \cdot b}}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 0\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 7 Accuracy 79.0% Cost 6920
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-29}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 0\\
\mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.35 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot {z}^{y}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 0\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 8 Accuracy 74.3% Cost 2017
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x + x \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\right) - a\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{-115}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 0\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-167}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-267}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 0\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{-147}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 0\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-48}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-29} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.05 \cdot 10^{-25}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot 0\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + t \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot y\right)\right) - y\right)\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 9 Accuracy 37.8% Cost 585
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+46} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.38 \cdot 10^{-15}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(x \cdot b\right)\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 10 Accuracy 37.6% Cost 584
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(-b\right)\right)\\
\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.38 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(x \cdot b\right)\\
\end{array}
\]
Alternative 11 Accuracy 30.2% Cost 64
\[x
\]