math.log/2 on complex, real part

Average Accuracy: 50.8% → 99.4%

Time: 14.9s

Precision: binary64

Cost: 19456

Math

\[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{im}{re} \cdot 0}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]

↓

\[\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log base} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im base)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (+ (* (log (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))) (log base)) (* (atan2 im re) 0.0))
  (+ (* (log base) (log base)) (* 0.0 0.0))))

↓

(FPCore (re im base) :precision binary64 (/ (log (hypot re im)) (log base)))

C

double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	return ((log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * log(base)) + (atan2(im, re) * 0.0)) / ((log(base) * log(base)) + (0.0 * 0.0));
}

↓

double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	return log(hypot(re, im)) / log(base);
}

Java

public static double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	return ((Math.log(Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * Math.log(base)) + (Math.atan2(im, re) * 0.0)) / ((Math.log(base) * Math.log(base)) + (0.0 * 0.0));
}

↓

public static double code(double re, double im, double base) {
	return Math.log(Math.hypot(re, im)) / Math.log(base);
}

Python

def code(re, im, base):
	return ((math.log(math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * math.log(base)) + (math.atan2(im, re) * 0.0)) / ((math.log(base) * math.log(base)) + (0.0 * 0.0))

↓

def code(re, im, base):
	return math.log(math.hypot(re, im)) / math.log(base)

Julia

function code(re, im, base)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(log(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im)))) * log(base)) + Float64(atan(im, re) * 0.0)) / Float64(Float64(log(base) * log(base)) + Float64(0.0 * 0.0)))
end

↓

function code(re, im, base)
	return Float64(log(hypot(re, im)) / log(base))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im, base)
	tmp = ((log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) * log(base)) + (atan2(im, re) * 0.0)) / ((log(base) * log(base)) + (0.0 * 0.0));
end

↓

function tmp = code(re, im, base)
	tmp = log(hypot(re, im)) / log(base);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_, base_] := N[(N[(N[(N[Log[N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[ArcTan[im / re], $MachinePrecision] * 0.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.0 * 0.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

↓

code[re_, im_, base_] := N[(N[Log[N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[Log[base], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 50.8%

   \[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{im}{re} \cdot 0}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]

2. Simplified 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log base}} \]
   Proof

   [Start] 50.8	\[ \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{im}{re} \cdot 0}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]
   mul0-rgt [=>] 50.8	\[ \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base + \color{blue}{0}}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]
   +-rgt-identity [=>] 50.8	\[ \frac{\color{blue}{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}}{\log base \cdot \log base + 0 \cdot 0} \]
   metadata-eval [=>] 50.8	\[ \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}{\log base \cdot \log base + \color{blue}{0}} \]
   +-rgt-identity [=>] 50.8	\[ \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right) \cdot \log base}{\color{blue}{\log base \cdot \log base}} \]
   times-frac [=>] 50.9	\[ \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base} \cdot \frac{\log base}{\log base}} \]
   *-inverses [=>] 50.9	\[ \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base} \cdot \color{blue}{1} \]
   *-rgt-identity [=>] 50.9	\[ \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log base}} \]
   hypot-def [=>] 99.4	\[ \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}{\log base} \]

3. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log base} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy	44.0%
Cost	13772

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -5.1 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-t_0}{\log base}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log im}{\log base}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{1}{\log base}}{\frac{-1}{t_0}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-\log im}{\log \left(\frac{1}{base}\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2
Accuracy	50.0%
Cost	13768

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{+85}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-\log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)}{\log base}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-157}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log \left(re \cdot re + im \cdot im\right)}{\log base} \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-\log im}{\log \left(\frac{1}{base}\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3
Accuracy	43.9%
Cost	13708

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-t_0}{\log base}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log im}{\log base}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -1.36 \cdot 10^{-58}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{-\log base}{t_0}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-\log im}{\log \left(\frac{1}{base}\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4
Accuracy	44.1%
Cost	13581

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{+15} \lor \neg \left(re \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{-14}\right) \land re \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-59}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-\log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)}{\log base}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log im}{\log base}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5
Accuracy	44.0%
Cost	13580

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{-\log \left(\frac{-1}{re}\right)}{\log base}\\ \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log im}{\log base}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-\log im}{\log \left(\frac{1}{base}\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6
Accuracy	27.8%
Cost	12992

\[\frac{\log im}{\log base} \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023135 
(FPCore (re im base)
  :name "math.log/2 on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (+ (* (log (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))) (log base)) (* (atan2 im re) 0.0)) (+ (* (log base) (log base)) (* 0.0 0.0))))