| Alternative 1 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 96.1% |
|---|
| Cost | 13476 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 0.0003499999875202775:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{u1 + \left(u1 \cdot u1\right) \cdot \left(0.5 - u1 \cdot -0.3333333333333333\right)} \cdot \cos t_0\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 2 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 94.6% |
|---|
| Cost | 13348 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right) \leq 0.0005000000237487257:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\cos \left(2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u2\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{u1 + u1 \cdot \left(u1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 3 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 90.7% |
|---|
| Cost | 13156 |
|---|
\[\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;u2 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi\right) \leq 0.014999999664723873:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)}\\
\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\cos \left(2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u2\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt{u1}\\
\end{array}
\]
| Alternative 4 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 80.4% |
|---|
| Cost | 6496 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u1\right)}
\]
| Alternative 5 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 76.9% |
|---|
| Cost | 3680 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{u1 - \left(u1 \cdot u1\right) \cdot \left(-0.5 + u1 \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 + u1 \cdot -0.25\right)\right)}
\]
| Alternative 6 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 75.6% |
|---|
| Cost | 3552 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{u1 - u1 \cdot \left(u1 \cdot \left(-0.5 + u1 \cdot -0.3333333333333333\right)\right)}
\]
| Alternative 7 |
|---|
| Accuracy | 73.0% |
|---|
| Cost | 3424 |
|---|
\[\sqrt{u1 + u1 \cdot \left(u1 \cdot 0.5\right)}
\]