Rosa's TurbineBenchmark

Average Accuracy: 79.8% → 99.7%

Time: 20.5s

Precision: binary64

Cost: 14208

Math

\[\left(\left(3 + \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\right) - \frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 - 2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot r\right) \cdot r\right)}{1 - v}\right) - 4.5 \]

↓

\[{r}^{-2} \cdot 2 + \left(-1.5 - \frac{w}{\frac{\frac{1 - v}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, -0.25, 0.375\right)}}{r}} \cdot \left(r \cdot w\right)\right) \]

FPCore

(FPCore (v w r)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (-
   (+ 3.0 (/ 2.0 (* r r)))
   (/ (* (* 0.125 (- 3.0 (* 2.0 v))) (* (* (* w w) r) r)) (- 1.0 v)))
  4.5))

↓

(FPCore (v w r)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  (* (pow r -2.0) 2.0)
  (- -1.5 (* (/ w (/ (/ (- 1.0 v) (fma v -0.25 0.375)) r)) (* r w)))))

C

double code(double v, double w, double r) {
	return ((3.0 + (2.0 / (r * r))) - (((0.125 * (3.0 - (2.0 * v))) * (((w * w) * r) * r)) / (1.0 - v))) - 4.5;
}

↓

double code(double v, double w, double r) {
	return (pow(r, -2.0) * 2.0) + (-1.5 - ((w / (((1.0 - v) / fma(v, -0.25, 0.375)) / r)) * (r * w)));
}

Julia

function code(v, w, r)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(3.0 + Float64(2.0 / Float64(r * r))) - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.125 * Float64(3.0 - Float64(2.0 * v))) * Float64(Float64(Float64(w * w) * r) * r)) / Float64(1.0 - v))) - 4.5)
end

↓

function code(v, w, r)
	return Float64(Float64((r ^ -2.0) * 2.0) + Float64(-1.5 - Float64(Float64(w / Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - v) / fma(v, -0.25, 0.375)) / r)) * Float64(r * w))))
end

Wolfram

code[v_, w_, r_] := N[(N[(N[(3.0 + N[(2.0 / N[(r * r), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(0.125 * N[(3.0 - N[(2.0 * v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(w * w), $MachinePrecision] * r), $MachinePrecision] * r), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 - v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 4.5), $MachinePrecision]

↓

code[v_, w_, r_] := N[(N[(N[Power[r, -2.0], $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-1.5 - N[(N[(w / N[(N[(N[(1.0 - v), $MachinePrecision] / N[(v * -0.25 + 0.375), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / r), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(r * w), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 79.8%

   \[\left(\left(3 + \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\right) - \frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 - 2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot r\right) \cdot r\right)}{1 - v}\right) - 4.5 \]

2. Simplified 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{r \cdot r} + \left(-1.5 - \frac{w}{\frac{\frac{1 - v}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, -0.25, 0.375\right)}}{r}} \cdot \left(r \cdot w\right)\right)} \]
   Proof

   [Start] 79.8	\[ \left(\left(3 + \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\right) - \frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 - 2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot r\right) \cdot r\right)}{1 - v}\right) - 4.5 \]
   sub-neg [=>] 79.8	\[ \color{blue}{\left(\left(3 + \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\right) + \left(-\frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 - 2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot r\right) \cdot r\right)}{1 - v}\right)\right)} - 4.5 \]
   +-commutative [=>] 79.8	\[ \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 - 2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot r\right) \cdot r\right)}{1 - v}\right) + \left(3 + \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\right)\right)} - 4.5 \]
   associate--l+ [=>] 79.8	\[ \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 - 2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot r\right) \cdot r\right)}{1 - v}\right) + \left(\left(3 + \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\right) - 4.5\right)} \]
   +-commutative [=>] 79.8	\[ \color{blue}{\left(\left(3 + \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\right) - 4.5\right) + \left(-\frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 - 2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot r\right) \cdot r\right)}{1 - v}\right)} \]
   sub-neg [=>] 79.8	\[ \color{blue}{\left(\left(3 + \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\right) + \left(-4.5\right)\right)} + \left(-\frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 - 2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot r\right) \cdot r\right)}{1 - v}\right) \]
   +-commutative [=>] 79.8	\[ \color{blue}{\left(\left(-4.5\right) + \left(3 + \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\right)\right)} + \left(-\frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 - 2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot r\right) \cdot r\right)}{1 - v}\right) \]
   associate-+r+ [=>] 79.9	\[ \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(-4.5\right) + 3\right) + \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\right)} + \left(-\frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 - 2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot r\right) \cdot r\right)}{1 - v}\right) \]
   +-commutative [<=] 79.9	\[ \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2}{r \cdot r} + \left(\left(-4.5\right) + 3\right)\right)} + \left(-\frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 - 2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot r\right) \cdot r\right)}{1 - v}\right) \]
   associate-+r+ [<=] 79.9	\[ \color{blue}{\frac{2}{r \cdot r} + \left(\left(\left(-4.5\right) + 3\right) + \left(-\frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 - 2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(w \cdot w\right) \cdot r\right) \cdot r\right)}{1 - v}\right)\right)} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{r}^{-2} \cdot 2} + \left(-1.5 - \frac{w}{\frac{\frac{1 - v}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, -0.25, 0.375\right)}}{r}} \cdot \left(r \cdot w\right)\right) \]
   Proof

   No proof available- proof too large to flatten.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto {r}^{-2} \cdot 2 + \left(-1.5 - \frac{w}{\frac{\frac{1 - v}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, -0.25, 0.375\right)}}{r}} \cdot \left(r \cdot w\right)\right) \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy	99.6%
Cost	7872

\[\left(-1.5 - \frac{w}{\frac{\frac{1 - v}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, -0.25, 0.375\right)}}{r}} \cdot \left(r \cdot w\right)\right) + \frac{2}{r \cdot r} \]

Alternative 2
Accuracy	97.8%
Cost	7556

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\\ \mathbf{if}\;w \leq -5.1 \cdot 10^{+141}:\\ \;\;\;\;{r}^{-2} \cdot 2 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{w}{\frac{4}{r}}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;w \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+161}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(t_0 + 3\right) + \left(w \cdot \left(r \cdot w\right)\right) \cdot \frac{-0.375 + \left(-2 \cdot v\right) \cdot -0.125}{\frac{1 - v}{r}}\right) + -4.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{w}{\frac{4}{r} + \frac{2}{r \cdot v}}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3
Accuracy	98.2%
Cost	3652

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\\ t_1 := t_0 + 3\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 - \frac{\left(0.125 \cdot \left(3 + -2 \cdot v\right)\right) \cdot \left(r \cdot \left(r \cdot \left(w \cdot w\right)\right)\right)}{1 - v} \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(r \cdot \left(w \cdot 0.25\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t_1 + \left(w \cdot \left(r \cdot w\right)\right) \cdot \frac{-0.375 + \left(-2 \cdot v\right) \cdot -0.125}{\frac{1 - v}{r}}\right) + -4.5\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4
Accuracy	97.4%
Cost	2376

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\\ \mathbf{if}\;w \cdot w \leq 10^{-313}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{\left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(0.375 + v \cdot -0.25\right)}{1 - v}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;w \cdot w \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+301}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(3 + \left(t_0 + \frac{0.125 \cdot \left(2 \cdot v + -3\right)}{\frac{1 - v}{r \cdot \left(r \cdot \left(w \cdot w\right)\right)}}\right)\right) + -4.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - w \cdot \left(r \cdot \frac{r \cdot w}{4}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5
Accuracy	96.1%
Cost	2252

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := w \cdot \left(r \cdot w\right)\\ t_1 := -0.375 + \left(-2 \cdot v\right) \cdot -0.125\\ t_2 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\\ t_3 := t_2 + 3\\ \mathbf{if}\;w \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+122}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_2 + \left(-1.5 - w \cdot \left(r \cdot \frac{r \cdot w}{4}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;w \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-170}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t_3 + \frac{r}{1 - v} \cdot \left(t_0 \cdot t_1\right)\right) + -4.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;w \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+161}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t_3 + t_0 \cdot \frac{t_1}{\frac{1 - v}{r}}\right) + -4.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_2 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{w}{\frac{4}{r} + \frac{2}{r \cdot v}}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6
Accuracy	98.9%
Cost	1737

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\\ \mathbf{if}\;v \leq -1.5 \lor \neg \left(v \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{-10}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{w}{\frac{4}{r}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{w}{\frac{2.6666666666666665}{r} + -0.8888888888888888 \cdot \frac{v}{r}}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7
Accuracy	99.0%
Cost	1736

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\\ \mathbf{if}\;v \leq -1.55:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{w}{\frac{4}{r} + \frac{2}{r \cdot v}}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;v \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{w}{\frac{2.6666666666666665}{r} + -0.8888888888888888 \cdot \frac{v}{r}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{w}{\frac{4}{r}}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8
Accuracy	96.7%
Cost	1732

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\\ \mathbf{if}\;v \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{w}{\frac{4}{r} + \frac{2}{r \cdot v}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{\left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(0.375 + v \cdot -0.25\right)}{1 - v}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9
Accuracy	98.9%
Cost	1609

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\\ \mathbf{if}\;v \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(v \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{-10}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{w}{\frac{4}{r}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 + \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(\left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(-0.375 + v \cdot -0.125\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10
Accuracy	82.8%
Cost	1484

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r} + \left(-1.5 + \left(r \cdot \left(w \cdot \left(r \cdot w\right)\right)\right) \cdot -0.375\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;r \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-81}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;r \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-71}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1.5 + \frac{\frac{2}{r}}{r}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;r \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+223}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;r \cdot \left(\left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(w \cdot -0.25\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11
Accuracy	95.4%
Cost	1353

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\\ \mathbf{if}\;v \leq -8.5 \lor \neg \left(v \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - w \cdot \left(r \cdot \frac{r \cdot w}{4}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - 0.375 \cdot \left(\left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(r \cdot w\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12
Accuracy	98.7%
Cost	1353

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\\ \mathbf{if}\;v \leq -1.4 \lor \neg \left(v \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{-10}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(r \cdot \left(w \cdot 0.25\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - 0.375 \cdot \left(\left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(r \cdot w\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 13
Accuracy	98.8%
Cost	1353

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\\ \mathbf{if}\;v \leq -1.2 \lor \neg \left(v \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{-10}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(r \cdot \left(w \cdot 0.25\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(r \cdot \left(w \cdot 0.375\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 14
Accuracy	98.8%
Cost	1353

\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2}{r \cdot r}\\ \mathbf{if}\;v \leq -1.1 \lor \neg \left(v \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{-10}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \frac{w}{\frac{4}{r}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 + \left(-1.5 - \left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(r \cdot \left(w \cdot 0.375\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 15
Accuracy	84.3%
Cost	1220

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;r \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+223}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{r \cdot r} + \left(-1.5 - 0.375 \cdot \left(\left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(r \cdot w\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;r \cdot \left(\left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(w \cdot -0.25\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 16
Accuracy	68.9%
Cost	841

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;r \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+192} \lor \neg \left(r \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+222}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;r \cdot \left(\left(r \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(w \cdot -0.25\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1.5 + \frac{\frac{2}{r}}{r}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 17
Accuracy	66.3%
Cost	708

\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;r \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.25 \cdot \left(r \cdot \left(r \cdot \left(w \cdot w\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1.5 + \frac{\frac{2}{r}}{r}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 18
Accuracy	67.1%
Cost	448

\[-1.5 + \frac{2}{r \cdot r} \]

Alternative 19
Accuracy	67.1%
Cost	448

\[-1.5 + \frac{\frac{2}{r}}{r} \]

Alternative 20
Accuracy	39.8%
Cost	320

\[\frac{2}{r \cdot r} \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023133 
(FPCore (v w r)
  :name "Rosa's TurbineBenchmark"
  :precision binary64
  (- (- (+ 3.0 (/ 2.0 (* r r))) (/ (* (* 0.125 (- 3.0 (* 2.0 v))) (* (* (* w w) r) r)) (- 1.0 v))) 4.5))